Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Guest Mickyblueeyes

King Power Out

By Guest Mickyblueeyes, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Mista_cle31

Mista_cle31

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

King Power and Jon Rudkin can definitely do one now!! Appointing the arrogant and obnoxious p***k that is Russell Martin, when your fan base have made it clear they don't want him! That's a big faux pas in my opinion.... This bridge is well and truly burnt!

Edited by Mista_cle31
  • Like 5
  • Popular Post
TheUltimateWinner

TheUltimateWinner

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

They tried to appoint Jesse March, who only pulled out the last minute.

 

They appointed Cooper.

 

Enzo was the outlier who they got incredibly lucky with.

 

Now they’ve appointed this clown. They don’t have a ****ing clue. 

  • Like 9
  • Popular Post
moore_94

moore_94

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
Just now, TheUltimateWinner said:

They tried to appoint Jesse March, who only pulled out the last minute.

 

They appointed Cooper.

 

Enzo was the outlier who they got incredibly lucky with.

 

Now they’ve appointed this clown. They don’t have a ****ing clue. 

Definitely only appointed Van Nistelrooy because 2 of his 4 games in charge of Man Utd were beating us easily

  • Like 9
  • Sad 1
Gamble92

Gamble92

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, moore_94 said:

Definitely only appointed Van Nistelrooy because 2 of his 4 games in charge of Man Utd were beating us easily

And Top's really strange obsession with so called big names in charge. 

inckley fox

inckley fox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, moore_94 said:

Definitely only appointed Van Nistelrooy because 2 of his 4 games in charge of Man Utd were beating us easily

 

33 minutes ago, Gamble92 said:

And Top's really strange obsession with so called big names in charge. 

You're forgetting that 'aura' of his.

 

I bet Russell Martin's got an almighty bastard of an aura about him too. Thank god for having a chairman who can spot that sort of thing.

  • Haha 1
Gamble92

Gamble92

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, inckley fox said:

 

You're forgetting that 'aura' of his.

 

I bet Russell Martin's got an almighty bastard of an aura about him too. Thank god for having a chairman who can spot that sort of thing.

Aura, the new fragrance by Russëll

Chrysalis

Chrysalis

Posted
Posted

I want him out twice over now.

 

Quote

In a rare interview with the British press in February, Srivaddhanaprabha outlined his determination to appoint a new head coach with a similar philosophy to Enzo Maresca, who achieved promotion to the Premier League in 2024.

He said: “We have to get back to the identity of Leicester, what type of football we should play and what players we should bring.

“I think it was so clear when we got Enzo on board, what football we should play, and the type of player we should bring in.”

 

Mark_w

Mark_w

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, Chrysalis said:

I want him out twice over now.

 

 

Is that real? Has he had no involvement in the 4 appointments since then? lol

Spanner73

Spanner73

Posted
Posted
On 14/06/2026 at 00:18, foxfanazer said:

Honestly when will these ****s leave? I wish somebody could tell me so I know when to take us seriously as a football club again

Just hope for bad results 

Promotion will only extend King Power’s tenure. Decline will lead to administration and get them gone for good 

 

AjcW

AjcW

Posted
Posted

The removal of his royal kneehighness from new manager comms is an interesting move.

 

On the one hand I think it's the right thing to do, they were never his words and people realised that when they were stupid enough to put him in front of a camera.

 

On the other hand it's a direct contradiction of 'i'm going to be more present and communicate more'

 

 

  • Like 1
SemperEadem

SemperEadem

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, AjcW said:

The removal of his royal kneehighness from new manager comms is an interesting move.

 

On the one hand I think it's the right thing to do, they were never his words and people realised that when they were stupid enough to put him in front of a camera.

 

On the other hand it's a direct contradiction of 'i'm going to be more present and communicate more'

 

 

He never was going to do anything he said was he, anyone with an ounce of critical thinking realised that.

  • Like 2
Ricey

Ricey

Posted
Posted
On 14/06/2026 at 17:00, Chrysalis said:

I want him out twice over now.

 

 

"We have to get back to the identity of Leicester, what type of football we should play and what players we should bring."
 

You'd think the 10-year anniversary might jog his memory of what our identity is and what type of football we should play.
 

He is so totally blinded by the fact we won the league under Enzo, yet that was probably par when you look at the squad and budget... never mind the fact that the players had to ditch his style to get us over the line.
 

Mad to think at the time, but I actually think not appointing Jesse Marsch was such a sliding-doors moment. I was pretty down on the idea of hiring him at the time, and I don't think he would have kept us up, but I do think he would still have got us back up automatically. The squad was too good, and I think his style would have suited them.

We then would have been in a better position to stay up the following season due to his style of play. Most importantly though, Top's belief about what "our identity" is would be very different and would align much more closely with the fans' view (aggression, pressing, high tempo, etc.).

21st Century Fox

21st Century Fox

Posted
Posted

Top should tell us all the exactly what our identity is. What is “the Leicester way”. I want it explained by him with a tactics board, with a historical highlights reel, detailing exactly how and why possession based football is so ingrained in our club DNA.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Chrysalis

Chrysalis

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Ricey said:

"We have to get back to the identity of Leicester, what type of football we should play and what players we should bring."
 

You'd think the 10-year anniversary might jog his memory of what our identity is and what type of football we should play.
 

He is so totally blinded by the fact we won the league under Enzo, yet that was probably par when you look at the squad and budget... never mind the fact that the players had to ditch his style to get us over the line.
 

Mad to think at the time, but I actually think not appointing Jesse Marsch was such a sliding-doors moment. I was pretty down on the idea of hiring him at the time, and I don't think he would have kept us up, but I do think he would still have got us back up automatically. The squad was too good, and I think his style would have suited them.

We then would have been in a better position to stay up the following season due to his style of play. Most importantly though, Top's belief about what "our identity" is would be very different and would align much more closely with the fans' view (aggression, pressing, high tempo, etc.).

Top also seems to have forgotten our history before the KP era as well, its as if the club only came to existence when KP brought it.

The possession game is his identity, not the clubs identity.

Edited by Chrysalis
  • Like 2
adamkhalifa

adamkhalifa

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 21st Century Fox said:

Top should tell us all the exactly what our identity is. What is “the Leicester way”. I want it explained by him with a tactics board, with a historical highlights reel, detailing exactly how and why possession based football is so ingrained in our club DNA.

I'm baffled by this DNA and identity rhetoric. I guess, after this RM appointment. They can close this chapeter and burn the book. We had hope, he would have learnt from Marti sacking. 

 

Give me a win rate over some superficial playing system. 

 

How have we missed out on Challinor over this fraud. 

 

 

OntarioFox

OntarioFox

Posted
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, Lambert09 said:

:wes:

That's surely code for 'nobody is going to bother with General sale and this is the only way we can maximise matchday revenue'?

 

11 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

I am looking forward to counting down the points until it is officially our worst ever season in our history

 

Fvckers, get out

42 points to drop over 46 games (2008-09 we managed 96 points). We ought to do a sweepstakes for when it will officially be the worst season in our 147 year history - my bet is mid-February.

 

Decent stick to beat Brussell with to be fair - anything short of what Pearson achieved is officially and objectively our all-time low point, promotion or not. 96 points is the target - no, the minimum.

Edited by OntarioFox

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...