Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, FrankieADZ said:

i dont mind the aways tbf, think the pink should have a black badge tho like the one from a few years back

I think that pink shirt is a goalie shirt 

Posted

Some of the ones some of you guys have made up on here is better than the new shirt. I don’t like the look of it but hard to say without seeing it properly.

Posted

Personally think that away kit is glorious, if the stripes are that faded yellow and its not a lighting issue.

 

And the good thing about betting sponsors is you can request sponsor sponsorless shirts.

 

Happy with those kits if they're real.

Posted

That pink has the exact same pattern and template as the gk shirt which is odd and not usually something Adidas would do. Think the pink is also GK.

  • Like 1
Guest Lako42
Posted

Whether it's a nice shirt or not has been completely irrelevant

 

 

 

Posted

Never understood the obsession with kits, used to be a 2 year cycle, clubs just taking the p1ss every year. 
 

I don’t care what it looks like would just prefer Faes, Daka, Soumare etc not to be wearing it next season. 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Phil Mitchell said:

Gimmick aside, as soon as the club post this on their socials, I’m off. Wont be following the club, won’t be posting on here. I can’t carry on backing this.

**** off you fairy. Phil 

 

 

oh

  • Haha 3
Posted

I'd like to say I'm shocked about us going down the dodgy overseas gambling sponsor route AGAIN (despite the concerns raised around BC Game), but I'm not. It's completely on brand with us these days.

 

That template which we look to have got on 2 kits is an absolute shit sandwich. Tacky and generic as it gets.

 

We're going to look every bit the 2 bob championship outfit we've become this season. 

Posted

The green and black is bloody lovely. The sponsor being a company that only made it's social accounts on June 5th and if you Google them, 3 of the top 5 results are Foxestalk mentioning them however makes me wonder if the words "due diligence" are known to our staff members. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Blue and white kop on FB has another image that at least shows the pinstripes all the way down the shirt. 

 

Have I just been AI tricked?

 

EDIT: yes, I have been AI tricked.

img_1_1752576355248.jpg

Edited by ramboacdc
I am a moron
Posted (edited)

Looks like we've taken one of Jamaica's away mock-ups as our away. 

 

All terrible. 

 

Back to random away colours again - no historical connection, no reason to buy

Edited by CosbehFox
Posted

Let's change to Puma they're paying a lot more than Adidas.

 

Manchester City have extended their kit partnership with Puma for at least another 10 years, with the contract understood to be worth a minimum of £1bn, making it the largest deal in the Premier League.

City initially signed a £65m-a-year deal with the German kit manufacturer in 2019 but the parties have agreed an extension until at least 2035, worth a record £100m a year to the club.

That figure surpasses the £90m deal signed by rivals Manchester United with Adidas in 2023, while champions Liverpool will also be with the same manufacturer from this season after agreeing a reported, external £60m a season.

City have enjoyed an unprecedented period of success since 2019, claiming four Premier League titles as well as the Treble two years ago, but finished last season without a major trophy.

Commercially, the two parties have achieved club record sales globally, according to City.

City Football Group (CFG) chief executive Ferran Soriano said: "We joined forces with Puma with the ambition to challenge ourselves and go beyond the expectations. We have achieved this and more over the last six seasons.

"Puma have seamlessly integrated into our organisation, and we have enjoyed many historic moments together, engaging fans globally."

Posted
1 minute ago, davieG said:

Let's change to Puma they're paying a lot more than Adidas.

 

Manchester City have extended their kit partnership with Puma for at least another 10 years, with the contract understood to be worth a minimum of £1bn, making it the largest deal in the Premier League.

City initially signed a £65m-a-year deal with the German kit manufacturer in 2019 but the parties have agreed an extension until at least 2035, worth a record £100m a year to the club.

That figure surpasses the £90m deal signed by rivals Manchester United with Adidas in 2023, while champions Liverpool will also be with the same manufacturer from this season after agreeing a reported, external £60m a season.

City have enjoyed an unprecedented period of success since 2019, claiming four Premier League titles as well as the Treble two years ago, but finished last season without a major trophy.

Commercially, the two parties have achieved club record sales globally, according to City.

City Football Group (CFG) chief executive Ferran Soriano said: "We joined forces with Puma with the ambition to challenge ourselves and go beyond the expectations. We have achieved this and more over the last six seasons.

"Puma have seamlessly integrated into our organisation, and we have enjoyed many historic moments together, engaging fans globally."

Puma don't have too many big clubs compared to Adidas/Nike, so they have had to overpay to keep them.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...