Cov 2-1 LCFC

[RonnieTodger]

It gets worse

[sdb]

12 minutes ago, Claridge said:

I'm not feeling the love Nelson gets on here, really poor today

Agreed. Thomas to his left and Okoli to his right, though. Not the ideal scenario for him to learn his trade.

[Aleksz]

4 minutes ago, RonnieTodger said:

It gets worse

Or here 

 

 

Luckily Nomads beat Cov Sphinx to prevent the clean sweep

[Pliskin]

For large spells of the first half, we looked every bit the side in control. From the opening exchanges there was a clear intent to play with pace and aggression, pressing Coventry high up the pitch and forcing them into rushed decisions. The tempo of our play was impressive, with quick ball circulation and a willingness from players to rotate positions, particularly in the attacking third, which repeatedly pulled Coventry’s defensive structure out of shape.

 

The goal itself was the clearest illustration of what we can be when things click. It came from sharp, interchangeable passing, players moving intelligently between the lines, and an understanding of space that Coventry struggled to cope with. It was slick, modern football, and for a period it felt as though we were on the verge of running away with the game.

 

In truth, we probably should have gone into the break three goals to the good. There were several gilt-edged chances to effectively kill the contest, but poor execution in key moments let Coventry off the hook. Some final passes lacked the required precision, while at other times attackers failed to position themselves smartly in the penalty area, arriving too early or too late to convert promising situations. These were not chances created by luck or chaos, but by good football — which makes their wastefulness all the more frustrating.

 

While the half was largely positive, it wasn’t entirely without warning signs. Coventry did pose a threat on transition and from moments of our carelessness, but those dangers were mostly managed well. We showed decent defensive discipline, recovering their shape quickly and making important interventions when required. The warning shots were there, but at the interval we still looked the sharper, fitter, and more coherent side.

 

The second half, however, was a completely different story — and a deeply concerning one. we start was poor, lacking intensity and focus, and it was no surprise when Coventry capitalised. The equalising goal was painfully simple, born from passive defending and a complete absence of aggression. Runners were allowed to move freely, space was left unprotected, and Coventry were gifted an opportunity that a well-organised side simply does not concede.

 

From that moment on, our system appeared to fall apart. The basic principles of professional football were no longer being adhered to. Players stopped tracking runners, failed to defend the space behind them, and were far too slow and timid when attempting to win the ball back. The team lost its shape with alarming ease, leaving gaps between the lines that Coventry exploited with growing confidence.

 

What was most worrying was that these issues were not new. The signs were evident, even in the first half, yet there was no visible correction. Marti failed to recognise — or act upon — the warning signals as the game drifted away. As the half wore on, our fitness levels seemed to fall off a cliff. The intensity that defined their first-half pressing disappeared, replaced by laboured movement and slow reactions.

 

Decision-making in the final third also deteriorated badly. Attacks broke down through rushed shots, poor choices, and a lack of composure, further highlighting a side playing without clarity or belief. The most dangerous players were increasingly isolated or misused, unable to influence the game in meaningful ways.

 

Ultimately, yet again as it has done many times this season…. this defeat feels self-inflicted. We should have won this game comfortably if we had taken our first-half chances. Instead, a lack of fitness, amateur defensive mistakes, and questionable tactical management proved costly. The team looks unfit, disjointed, and not fully aligned with the manager’s philosophy — and more worryingly, that philosophy does not appear to be getting the best out of the players at his disposal.

 

There is talent in this squad, and the first half showed what is possible when things function properly. This was a game that should have been put to bed early — instead, it became another painful lesson in what happens when promise goes unfulfilled. But this isn’t the first time this season…..

[Tommy G]

48 minutes ago, sdb said:

Agreed. Thomas to his left and Okoli to his right, though. Not the ideal scenario for him to learn his trade.

Everyone else’s fault he’s crap then? You could apply that logic throughout the team in that case 

[Tommy G]

Can’t believe how high the Cov back line was and we managed to just score 1, really poor 

[Rubbersoul]

3 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

Everyone else’s fault he’s crap then? You could apply that logic throughout the team in that case 

Nelson isn’t crap come on lol. Rubbish second half but you can’t just say he’s crap.

[Rubbersoul]

Would love to see how these players would look under a manager that can actually set a team up. 
 

I think a few of them are looking worse than they actually are 

[ElusiveEd]

Just want to put it out there that I really appreciate all those FT'ers who didn't reply to my pleas for 2 tickets for this over on the Tickets And Travel pages.

 

I put a plea out at least twice looking for tickets for myself and my son but nobody replied or offered to help out and for that we both thank you.

 

You saved us £90 and instead of spending that £ on just getting f*****g angry at what happened at the ground we just got f****** angry at home for free.

 

Will be forever in your debt for what you didn't do for us and once again THANK YOU. 

[dayday]

45 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

For large spells of the first half, we looked every bit the side in control. From the opening exchanges there was a clear intent to play with pace and aggression, pressing Coventry high up the pitch and forcing them into rushed decisions. The tempo of our play was impressive, with quick ball circulation and a willingness from players to rotate positions, particularly in the attacking third, which repeatedly pulled Coventry’s defensive structure out of shape.

 

The goal itself was the clearest illustration of what we can be when things click. It came from sharp, interchangeable passing, players moving intelligently between the lines, and an understanding of space that Coventry struggled to cope with. It was slick, modern football, and for a period it felt as though we were on the verge of running away with the game.

 

In truth, we probably should have gone into the break three goals to the good. There were several gilt-edged chances to effectively kill the contest, but poor execution in key moments let Coventry off the hook. Some final passes lacked the required precision, while at other times attackers failed to position themselves smartly in the penalty area, arriving too early or too late to convert promising situations. These were not chances created by luck or chaos, but by good football — which makes their wastefulness all the more frustrating.

 

While the half was largely positive, it wasn’t entirely without warning signs. Coventry did pose a threat on transition and from moments of our carelessness, but those dangers were mostly managed well. We showed decent defensive discipline, recovering their shape quickly and making important interventions when required. The warning shots were there, but at the interval we still looked the sharper, fitter, and more coherent side.

 

The second half, however, was a completely different story — and a deeply concerning one. we start was poor, lacking intensity and focus, and it was no surprise when Coventry capitalised. The equalising goal was painfully simple, born from passive defending and a complete absence of aggression. Runners were allowed to move freely, space was left unprotected, and Coventry were gifted an opportunity that a well-organised side simply does not concede.

 

From that moment on, our system appeared to fall apart. The basic principles of professional football were no longer being adhered to. Players stopped tracking runners, failed to defend the space behind them, and were far too slow and timid when attempting to win the ball back. The team lost its shape with alarming ease, leaving gaps between the lines that Coventry exploited with growing confidence.

 

What was most worrying was that these issues were not new. The signs were evident, even in the first half, yet there was no visible correction. Marti failed to recognise — or act upon — the warning signals as the game drifted away. As the half wore on, our fitness levels seemed to fall off a cliff. The intensity that defined their first-half pressing disappeared, replaced by laboured movement and slow reactions.

 

Decision-making in the final third also deteriorated badly. Attacks broke down through rushed shots, poor choices, and a lack of composure, further highlighting a side playing without clarity or belief. The most dangerous players were increasingly isolated or misused, unable to influence the game in meaningful ways.

 

Ultimately, yet again as it has done many times this season…. this defeat feels self-inflicted. We should have won this game comfortably if we had taken our first-half chances. Instead, a lack of fitness, amateur defensive mistakes, and questionable tactical management proved costly. The team looks unfit, disjointed, and not fully aligned with the manager’s philosophy — and more worryingly, that philosophy does not appear to be getting the best out of the players at his disposal.

 

There is talent in this squad, and the first half showed what is possible when things function properly. This was a game that should have been put to bed early — instead, it became another painful lesson in what happens when promise goes unfulfilled. But this isn’t the first time this season…..

The story of our season in a nutshell 

 

 

[ozvaldo]

If we had a proper striker, we’d have won today. 
 

We’d have had at least 3 in the first half. 

[DJW1]

18 minutes ago, ozvaldo said:

If we had a proper striker, we’d have won today. 
 

We’d have had at least 3 in the first half. 

If we had a proper striker we'd be in the top 6, despite our shortcomings

[Lineker's Left Foot]

Am now on Sky Blues Talk winding them

up.  I’m not letting them enjoy this Evening as they’re really biting!

 

So much hatred 😂😂😂⚽️🦊

[damolcfc]

1 minute ago, Lineker's Left Foot said:

Am now on Sky Blues Talk winding them

up.  I’m not letting them enjoy this Evening as they’re really biting!

 

So much hatred 😂😂😂⚽️🦊

What are you, 10 years old....

 

 

Get stuck in lad 🤣🤣🦊🦊

[Lineker's Left Foot]

Just now, damolcfc said:

What are you, 10 years old....

 

 

Get stuck in lad 🤣🤣🦊🦊

Been on there for ages - I am Leicesterfox on there - and it’s annoying them on their enjoyable big Evening.

 

I’m a sad barsteward, but they will always be in our shadow!  Never boring being a Leicester fan!

[blueharmie]

My ****ing god we are absolutely shite.

 

No return 

[Muzzy_no7]

2 hours ago, Tommy G said:

Can’t believe how high the Cov back line was and we managed to just score 1, really poor 

Cov played it smart with their really high line for Ayew and then dropped it to standard/low when Daka came on 

[filbertway]

Cov good. Us bad. Us bad v wrexham? Maybe.

[Tommy G]

14 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

Cov played it smart with their really high line for Ayew and then dropped it to standard/low when Daka came on 

We had so many chances to bury it in the 1st half 

[Muzzy_no7]

Just had a look on their forum bloody hell😂😂😂.

 

Weirdest fanbase going. 

[Tommy G]

Just now, Muzzy_no7 said:

Just had a look on their forum bloody hell😂😂😂.

 

Weirdest fanbase going. 

Have you seen our forum? 

[DJ Barry Hammond]

6 hours ago, Jazzy_Jeff said:

Should have been 3-0 up at HT.

 

2nd half was a shambles. Giving them an early goal was one thing but it was crying out for a change of shape.

 

Should have gone 3-5-2 with Vestergaard coming on to give us some control. Was only going to be one winner from the 46th min onwards. 

You what? 
 

What’s happening with Mavididi and Fatawu if we’re going 3-5-2?

 

And when are you applying this shape change? 
 

At halftime, where up to that point we had looked really good in our original shape? 
 

I think changing formation to one we haven’t played or trained for, that also takes two of our most threatening attacking players out of their natural positions would be a very bizarre move for a manager to make.

[Muzzy_no7]

21 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

Have you seen our forum? 

Ahahah true however our football forum is actually OK compared to others, it’s just our general chat part that sets us apart 😂

[Long Eaton Fox]

3 hours ago, Pliskin said:

For large spells of the first half, we looked every bit the side in control. From the opening exchanges there was a clear intent to play with pace and aggression, pressing Coventry high up the pitch and forcing them into rushed decisions. The tempo of our play was impressive, with quick ball circulation and a willingness from players to rotate positions, particularly in the attacking third, which repeatedly pulled Coventry’s defensive structure out of shape.

 

The goal itself was the clearest illustration of what we can be when things click. It came from sharp, interchangeable passing, players moving intelligently between the lines, and an understanding of space that Coventry struggled to cope with. It was slick, modern football, and for a period it felt as though we were on the verge of running away with the game.

 

In truth, we probably should have gone into the break three goals to the good. There were several gilt-edged chances to effectively kill the contest, but poor execution in key moments let Coventry off the hook. Some final passes lacked the required precision, while at other times attackers failed to position themselves smartly in the penalty area, arriving too early or too late to convert promising situations. These were not chances created by luck or chaos, but by good football — which makes their wastefulness all the more frustrating.

 

While the half was largely positive, it wasn’t entirely without warning signs. Coventry did pose a threat on transition and from moments of our carelessness, but those dangers were mostly managed well. We showed decent defensive discipline, recovering their shape quickly and making important interventions when required. The warning shots were there, but at the interval we still looked the sharper, fitter, and more coherent side.

 

The second half, however, was a completely different story — and a deeply concerning one. we start was poor, lacking intensity and focus, and it was no surprise when Coventry capitalised. The equalising goal was painfully simple, born from passive defending and a complete absence of aggression. Runners were allowed to move freely, space was left unprotected, and Coventry were gifted an opportunity that a well-organised side simply does not concede.

 

From that moment on, our system appeared to fall apart. The basic principles of professional football were no longer being adhered to. Players stopped tracking runners, failed to defend the space behind them, and were far too slow and timid when attempting to win the ball back. The team lost its shape with alarming ease, leaving gaps between the lines that Coventry exploited with growing confidence.

 

What was most worrying was that these issues were not new. The signs were evident, even in the first half, yet there was no visible correction. Marti failed to recognise — or act upon — the warning signals as the game drifted away. As the half wore on, our fitness levels seemed to fall off a cliff. The intensity that defined their first-half pressing disappeared, replaced by laboured movement and slow reactions.

 

Decision-making in the final third also deteriorated badly. Attacks broke down through rushed shots, poor choices, and a lack of composure, further highlighting a side playing without clarity or belief. The most dangerous players were increasingly isolated or misused, unable to influence the game in meaningful ways.

 

Ultimately, yet again as it has done many times this season…. this defeat feels self-inflicted. We should have won this game comfortably if we had taken our first-half chances. Instead, a lack of fitness, amateur defensive mistakes, and questionable tactical management proved costly. The team looks unfit, disjointed, and not fully aligned with the manager’s philosophy — and more worryingly, that philosophy does not appear to be getting the best out of the players at his disposal.

 

There is talent in this squad, and the first half showed what is possible when things function properly. This was a game that should have been put to bed early — instead, it became another painful lesson in what happens when promise goes unfulfilled. But this isn’t the first time this season…..

A good analysis of the season so far.  Their is a lot of talent in this team. I only see home games so can't comment on today for example. We lack a physical edge to our game. When the going gets tough we don't.  Strong full backs, centre midfielder  and a cf are required.  Their is talent coming through but mostly not ready yet. Monga started well but his progress has slowed. Page has looked stronger with every appearance. I've not seen Aluko play.  A number of other u21 are getting there but not yet. I do feel we are starting to progress though. 

[Bptiger]

Let’s stop beating around the bush , our defence is pathetic and that goes for a class striker, fix those two areas and I think we could still make the play offs