Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

Franco Ravizzoli joins on 3 year deal - Official

By moore_94, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

ozvaldo

ozvaldo

Posted
Posted

We've been crying out for wasting money we don't have by paying off our 3rd choice keeper, to bring in another 3rd choice keeper who'll never play to be fair. 

So, naturally, I'm delighted we got this over the line.

  • Haha 2
HarryDee8

HarryDee8

Posted
Posted

Smells of another panic buy to fill a number.

 

Doubt any long term thought was taken for him to challenge for the no 1 spot. 

 

Club recruitment is poor....

 

 

  • Popular Post
sm1

sm1

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
26 minutes ago, Long Eaton Fox said:

We don't have to see  a photo of him as we'll never see him in real life.

images.jpg.39b3e2ffdc14d3e44df75bf850413cb1.jpg

  • Haha 6
Sooper Steve's shin

Sooper Steve's shin

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Foxin_Mad said:

Why the **** do we need 3 keepers? especially a shit one, anyone can be shit in goal. The club is ****ing unreal, absolutely off its head, no proper striker, 3 keepers. Top work by the football department yet again, clear to see standards have been raised by Rudkin and his band of useless ****s. He HAS to **** off! 

Not sure why this deal is generating messages like this. We will always want one goalkeeper and one sub keeper every first team match day. If one of them gets injured (and one already is!) then we'd be scraping by with an untried youth teamer player - that's bad planning by any stretch of the imagination. Three reasonably first-team keepers is the minimum we should have if (as we hope) we are going to challenge to get out of this league.

 

To put in further context, what would everyone be saying if McCarthy's current injury kept him out until Christmas? Stolarczyk had injuries last year in his only season as our number one and he'll be even more exposed to challenges/potential injury in Martin's style of play. It would be reckless NOT to sign anyone when you think of it like this.

  • Like 2
Headcase

Headcase

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, HarryDee8 said:

Smells of another panic buy to fill a number.

 

Doubt any long term thought was taken for him to challenge for the no 1 spot. 

 

Club recruitment is poor....

 

 

This keeper is a friend of someone, look how the manager greeted him in the social media video, they know each other well, it looked like he was about to give him a reach around.

Edited by Headcase
  • Haha 1
Gamble92

Gamble92

Posted
Posted

Quite obvious that he's filling the place of Vietes and McCarthy was favoured over giving Begovic a contract to fill the elderly goalkeeper that acts as mentor. 

 

I get why fans are critical after what we have endured but you don't need to react like this to a 2nd choice goalkeeper deal. 

OntarioFox

OntarioFox

Posted
Posted

scenes when Dad calls him Ravioli, not even to be funny but because he actually thinks that's his name

Foxin_Mad

Foxin_Mad

Posted
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Sooper Steve's shin said:

Not sure why this deal is generating messages like this. We will always want one goalkeeper and one sub keeper every first team match day. If one of them gets injured (and one already is!) then we'd be scraping by with an untried youth teamer player - that's bad planning by any stretch of the imagination. Three reasonably first-team keepers is the minimum we should have if (as we hope) we are going to challenge to get out of this league.

 

To put in further context, what would everyone be saying if McCarthy's current injury kept him out until Christmas? Stolarczyk had injuries last year in his only season as our number one and he'll be even more exposed to challenges/potential injury in Martin's style of play. It would be reckless NOT to sign anyone when you think of it like this.

Its in the context of pure ineptitude by the club, release a keeper they deem shit that was signed last year, bring in another keeper who appears to be utterly shit, all when we have ZERO senior strikers at the club and are sending the youngsters out on loan. Its like this club has no intention of winning football matches, the guys running the show honestly have no clue what they are doing. 

Edited by Foxin_Mad
Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Headcase said:

This keeper is a friend of someone, look how the manager greeted him in the social media video, the know each other well, it looked like he was about to give him a reach around.

He’s worked with Martin before at mk dons. 
 

I think Martin has brought in a personality he knows well for the 3rd choice role and I don’t think that’s a bad thing 

It'sblueupnorth

It'sblueupnorth

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Sooper Steve's shin said:

Not sure why this deal is generating messages like this. We will always want one goalkeeper and one sub keeper every first team match day. If one of them gets injured (and one already is!) then we'd be scraping by with an untried youth teamer player - that's bad planning by any stretch of the imagination. Three reasonably first-team keepers is the minimum we should have if (as we hope) we are going to challenge to get out of this league.

 

To put in further context, what would everyone be saying if McCarthy's current injury kept him out until Christmas? Stolarczyk had injuries last year in his only season as our number one and he'll be even more exposed to challenges/potential injury in Martin's style of play. It would be reckless NOT to sign anyone when you think of it like this.

If both 1st and 2nd choice keepers were injured we’d be able to get an emergency loan in. Completely irrelevant 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...