Daggers Posted 19 February 2009 Posted 19 February 2009 I've just read in a pulp newspaper today that the whole story's supposed to be a hoax.The kid's not the kid's kid. Allegedly. Gettaway. I'm shocked.
Shrenchel Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Not his. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2...15875-21227974/ What a joke. Poor lad. No doubt the parents made some serious queens heads out of it.
Guest Bilo Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Not surprised, just look at the lad, I'd be surprised if his balls had dropped. Poor kids (applied to mother and baby) still don't exactly have the brightest of future prospects though,
welck12 Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 I'd like to say I'm shocked. I can't. I'm shocked that your not shocked, i like everybody else was totally convinced the kid was his...
Katy Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Most lads at that age don't have sperm in their ejaculations that can actually swim properly so it was always going to be unlikely. Maybe Tanya Pantsdown should have paid attention in biology before conning him into thinking he was the dad.
Corky Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Not shocked, but you've got to feel for the lad. He looked like he cared, and he must be heartbroken now. Whatever the wrongs of how this baby came about, he didn't deserve this.
lcfc_jme Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Pfffft. The only person I actually feel sorry for in this entire fiasco is the baby. It's seems to have little hope of growing up well at the minute and chances it'll get worse before it even begins to get better.
BoneDog Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Most lads at that age don't have sperm in their ejaculations that can actually swim properly so it was always going to be unlikely. Maybe Tanya Pantsdown should have paid attention in biology before conning him into thinking he was the dad.
Flynny Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Most lads at that age don't have sperm in their ejaculations that can actually swim properly so it was always going to be unlikely. Maybe Tanya Pantsdown should have paid attention in biology before conning him into thinking he was the dad. I really don't know why I found that so funny but
BoneDog Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Not shocked, but you've got to feel for the lad. He looked like he cared, and he must be heartbroken now.Whatever the wrongs of how this baby came about, he didn't deserve this. Yes, I was quite happy at the start cos I thought 'he's a nice lad and maybe the kid will have a good Dad'. But now who knows?
BoneDog Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Gotta say though, I'd already had 11 kids when I was his age. And everyone of em knows about high-speed manouveres in a 1.6i. That's good parenting
Monk Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Most lads at that age don't have sperm in their ejaculations that can actually swim properly so it was always going to be unlikely. Maybe Tanya Pantsdown should have paid attention in biology before conning him into thinking he was the dad. Most lads that age can't actually swim properly!
MC Prussian Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Most lads that age can't actually swim properly! Or - even worse - spell correctly.
Dr The Singh Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 Gotta say though, I'd already had 11 kids when I was his age.And everyone of em knows about high-speed manouveres in a 1.6i. That's good parenting
Uncle Albert Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 What a whore she is. That lad is a lucky little sod.
Koke Posted 26 March 2009 Posted 26 March 2009 What a whore she is. That lad is a lucky little sod. The lad was desperate. And when you're desperate Karen Matthews will look like Jennifer Lopez to you.
hairy Posted 27 March 2009 Posted 27 March 2009 Article has gone now. Maybe it was factually inaccurate and had to be removed. Maybe she only shagged 13 kids
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.