Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Bausor

Leicester City Vs Watford

Recommended Posts

Posted

Kasp

Pelt

St ledge

Bamb

Konch

Johnson

Wellen

Abe

Dyer

Beckford

Nugent

Johnson in front of back floor, wellens pushing forward like when came on against brum and Abe and dyer playing wider.

Need to develop an option that give us more width when the diamond isn't working.

Posted

Would love to see:

Schmeichel

Peltier - St Ledger - Bamba

Pantsil -----–----------------- Schlupp

--------------Abe----------------

Johnson-King

Nugent-Beckford.

3-5-2.

Posted

This has been an immensely productive fixture in recent years, I can't see it being the same in terms of goals but we do have enough to beat most at home.

2-0 win.

Posted

Would love to see:

Schmeichel

Peltier - St Ledger - Bamba

Pantsil -----–----------------- Schlupp

--------------Abe----------------

Johnson-King

Nugent-Beckford.

3-5-2.

What the **** is that?

2 right backs, 3 strikers and 2 attacking midfielders squeezed into a formation that doesn't have full backs?

Posted

Watford will park the bus. They will not be open and attacking.

I think the game will be more difficult than what people expect. Hopefully we will win, but, I have a horrible feeling about the game.

Posted

---------------Kasper

Peltier--Ledge--Bamba--Konch

---------Wellens--Gelson

Vass-------King/John------Nuge

-------------Beckford

+ Weale, Pantsil, Abe, Dyer, Howard

Implementation of a 4-2-3-1, giving us more width but still keeping a strong, fluid, fast and commanding core.

Beckford and St Ledger given a real chance to show what their's made of. Carnt fully decide bench because of the retarded 5 rule.

3 - 2 win

Go down early, but equalize just before half time, take lead around 60, but defence fail and Sordell nips in, we snatch late winner (maybe contraversial).

Posted

What the **** is that?

2 right backs, 3 strikers and 2 attacking midfielders squeezed into a formation that doesn't have full backs?

Im on my phone so cant format it but its 3-5-2. Pantsil and Schlupp wing backs. Peltier at centre back. Abe, king and Johnson across the middle but Abe sitting deeper. Not rocket science???

Posted

Im on my phone so cant format it but its 3-5-2. Pantsil and Schlupp wing backs. Peltier at centre back. Abe, king and Johnson across the middle but Abe sitting deeper. Not rocket science???

Adventurous ill give you that!

I actually wouldn't mind reverting to the MON type formation, though it would require the recall of the Tunch. I don't think Pantsil should be anywhere near the first team from what I've seen so far. Schulpp is a promising prospect do I can't have him being put a left back.

3-5-2

Kasper

Peltier

Konchesky

Bamba

Mills

Tunchev (SSL for now)

Fernandes

Abe

Johnson

Nugent

Beckford

I'd happily give that team a shot, it won't happen though, Sven won't go to a new formation now and he also won't drop Vassell.

Posted

Back 5 picks itself, it would be cruel of Sven not to pick St Ledger :giggle:

I'd like to see Beckford and Nugent start together, and I do actually believe Sven will drop Vassell. I know he doesn't usually, but there comes a point when Nugent and Beckford have to start together in the diamond formation and I reckon that day will arrive on Wednesday.

The midfield is extremely difficult to choose. Wellens either plays in the holding role, or not at all. He can't play the role that Danns or Fernandes plays, as he simply doesn't have the energy for it. If Johnson's fitness levels are good enough then I'd bring him in for Danns. We need more creativity in the park, and Johnson and Wellens would definitely provide that. King to start at the head of the diamond, but I want him to get forward more, like he was last season.

The bench has got to be different from yesterday. We don't need 6 centre midfielders in a 16 man squad! Weale, Pantsil, Danns/Abe, Vassell/Schlupp/Dyer, Howard. Having Howard on the bench is extremely useful, especially when trying to break down teams. We need more variety on the bench, no point wasting two spots on a 5 man bench with Wellens and Johnson (like we did yesterday) as they're relatively similar players.

Posted

I know it won't happen but I would like to see this starting XI:

----------------------Kasper S----------------------

Peltier, St Ledger, Sol B, Konchesky

-----------------------Abe--------------------------

----Danns ---------------------------Fernandes

--------------------Schlupp-------------------------

---------- Nugent----------Beckford

Bench: Weale, Pantsil, Wellens, Vassell, King

Posted

Watford will park the bus. They will not be open and attacking.

I think the game will be more difficult than what people expect. Hopefully we will win, but, I have a horrible feeling about the game.

An early goal, as ever, is crucial.

We are then able to dictate the game.

Posted

Got to win really.

Schmeichel

Peltier - Bamba - St Ledger - Konchesky

Fernandes

Johnson - King

Vassell - Beckford - Nugent

I've got an erection just thinking about that front six.

Posted

Why is Wellens suddenly back in people's starting XI?? I thought Abe was decent and deserves to keep his place.

Because there is absolutely no creativity in the midfield otherwise. I'm not a big fan, I'd rather have MJ but we need one at least.

Posted

We'll score NONE.

You guys usually get 4 against us.

So...4-0?

Did you not see us yesterday?!

But, if you could arrange that, that'll be lovely :thumbup:

Posted

4-2-3-1

Schmeichel

Peltier--------St Ledger--------Bamba--------Konchesky

Wellens--------Fernandes

Vassel--------King--------Nugent

Beckford

Subs- Weale , Pantsil , Johnson , Gallagher/ Danns, Schlupp

Posted

Ok guys I have to say that I am totally uninspired by the team selections on this website. Defence is spot on but that's the easy part.

Below is a team that will never be picked on Wednesday night nor ever....but I would be very interested to hear anyones argument against it being a strong and WELL BALANCED team - not that we'll ever find out?!?! We should've learnt by now the 4 centre mids across midfield is not working (wasn't the reason we won against Derby - players played well that night not formation) nor is the 4-3-3 system!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My team if I were manager tomorrow night would be....

Kasper

Pelts

Bamba

St Ledger

Konchesky

Vassell (Right wing!!)

Johnson (Central Midfield)

Wellens (Central Midfield)

Dyer (Left wing!!)

Beckford

Nugent

Subs:

Weale

Pantsil

Howard

Danns

Fernandes

Plan with this team is in Wellens and Johnson you have strong central midfielders who can both defend and attack also deliver a f***ing decent pass. You have wingers playing on their right sides (feet) who can cross and strikers who can score headers and poach goals. Nugent and Beckford are not going to work together or score unless they get SERVICE!! Nor is Vassell a true out and out striker.

F**k the 4-3-3 idea and the diamond formation and lets put on abloddy show....Watford wouldn't see it f***ing coming!!!

Posted

Did you not see us yesterday?!

But, if you could arrange that, that'll be lovely :thumbup:

Yes but remember we lost to Forest at home...and only just beat Millwall.

Just cannot score for toffee.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...