Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
stourbridgefox

James Chester

By stourbridgefox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Jimmy

Jimmy

Posted
Posted

Hull fans on another forum reckon we'd have to pay "Mills money" but that "Chester is better then Mills so £7m".

ffs its this time last year Mills was meant to be the best defender in the league.

I wish Nige & Mills would go into a room and talk this out properly without the stress of trying to catch the play off places, I think they'd be able to work out their differences and save having to take the hit on Mills' fee

Mark_w

Mark_w

Posted
Posted

Hull fans on another forum reckon we'd have to pay "Mills money" but that "Chester is better then Mills so £7m".

ffs its this time last year Mills was meant to be the best defender in the league.

I wish Nige & Mills would go into a room and talk this out properly without the stress of trying to catch the play off places, I think they'd be able to work out their differences and save having to take the hit on Mills' fee

Imagine the money Mills is on. For all we know Mills recieves a massive financial boost if he plays any more games or we have to give more money to Reading. His wages will be massive, so when better players are available for less money we'd be stupid to stick with Mills just because we over-paid for him in the first place.

Jimmy

Jimmy

Posted
Posted

Chester isn't better then Mills though, people are saying the same about him they were saying this time last year about Mills

Leicester Lass

Leicester Lass

Posted
Posted

Chester isn't better then Mills though, people are saying the same about him they were saying this time last year about Mills

But Chester is a better option for us than Mills in the circumstances. I'd like things to work out for Mills here, I'd probably have him in my starting 11, but it's quite clear it's best for both parties if he moves on. Our focus is to cut our losses on him, and bring in a replacement. Chester may not be better as an individual in your opinion, but he's guaranteed to be a better option for the team as a whole.

Jimmy

Jimmy

Posted
Posted

All I'm saying is I'd be happier if they at least tried to clear the differences, if after he still left then fine I just think this is 1 we're going to regret that's all

Mark_w

Mark_w

Posted
Posted

Chester isn't better then Mills though, people are saying the same about him they were saying this time last year about Mills

The Reading fans said that Mills wasn't that good and were happy to sell him. The Hull fans think Chester is fantastic and don't want him to leave. Seeing as they are the people who watch them every week I'd say they are the opinions we should be trusting.

Jimmy

Jimmy

Posted
Posted

yeah because people never have an inflated opinion of their own players...

Just look at Iain Hume a VERY average player that was God like to most when he was here

nickelbyfox

nickelbyfox

Posted
Posted

yeah because people never have an inflated opinion of their own players...

Just look at Iain Hume a VERY average player that was God like to most when he was here

Couldn't agree more, people always claim these trusted fan sources saying this. What is this a google search 'Chester Hull City forum', and have a look from the comfort our computer?

If a Huddersfield fan did that to us for Peltier or the same for Bamba, they would see negative comments and would forget buying them?

Like this forum it is an opinion and a view which should be considered, but cant be the best tool for rating potential signings

Mark_w

Mark_w

Posted
Posted

yeah because people never have an inflated opinion of their own players...

Just look at Iain Hume a VERY average player that was God like to most when he was here

The Reading fans said that Mills wasn't that good and were happy to sell him.

Was my point.

Jimmy

Jimmy

Posted
Posted

and we've bought players other fans said were shit and sold players we thought were shit in the past that have turned out to be superb for the buying club

Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted

All I'm saying is I'd be happier if they at least tried to clear the differences, if after he still left then fine I just think this is 1 we're going to regret that's all

How do you know they've not already tried?

Babylon

Babylon

Posted
Posted

Chester isn't better then Mills though, people are saying the same about him they were saying this time last year about Mills

Difference being Hull fans (who see him all the time) rate him, where as Reading fans in the main detested Mills and said he was crap unless he was on TV.

flowwolf

flowwolf

Posted
Posted

I don't care or trust what Reading fans said about Mills. But having seen his piss poor standard of playing ability for myself I can only concur with them.

How on earth Erickson paid that kind of money for such a mediocre championship standard player is beyond all reason. And if he was that good for them how come they have made no effort to get him back ? Come back to haunt us ? he couldn't haunt his fvcking self.

Jaspa

Jaspa

Posted
Posted

I have a funny feeling we might offer Mills as part of a deal for Chester.

Mills really isnt the type of player to be playing for Hull

They also lack the ambitions he has portrayed

Celtic are Champions League

Can see Leeds back in the Prem in 2-4 years

We were in a position to be in the Prem with Sven

Hull are . . . . . . Hull

Would still like Chester tho

Would give us great balance in CB with Morgan & Chester :thumbup:

ithuriel

ithuriel

Posted
Posted

I don't care or trust what Reading fans said about Mills. But having seen his piss poor standard of playing ability for myself I can only concur with them.

Come back to haunt us ? he couldn't haunt his fvcking self.

Bet he could trip over himself though and concede a penalty whilst doing so and then get sent off lol

Mark_w

Mark_w

Posted
Posted

They also lack the ambitions he has portrayed

I think you're confusing greed with ambition mate.

foxfanazer

foxfanazer

Posted
Posted

Would much prefer Chester to Chambers. Having already played under Pearson I dont think he'd have a bad attitude like mills when not selected. SSL and Chester with Morgan on the bench sounds good to me

bald reynard

bald reynard

Posted
Posted

Would much prefer Chester to Chambers. Having already played under Pearson I dont think he'd have a bad attitude like mills when not selected. SSL and Chester with Morgan on the bench sounds good to me

As reported, PEARSON would prefer Chester to Chambers ! It's just that 'needs must' - ie he needs an alternative when Hull turn us down (or Chester himself does) - as I'm sure they will do. IF Bruce takes up the offer of the Hull job, there's no way he'll want to get rid, unless it's BIG money (and I don't think Pearson is in the game of big money for the likes of JC).

foxfanazer

foxfanazer

Posted
Posted

As reported, PEARSON would prefer Chester to Chambers ! It's just that 'needs must' - ie he needs an alternative when Hull turn us down (or Chester himself does) - as I'm sure they will do. IF Bruce takes up the offer of the Hull job, there's no way he'll want to get rid, unless it's BIG money (and I don't think Pearson is in the game of big money for the likes of JC).

I totally agree they will hold us over a barrel with this transfer but things don't look quite as rosey at hull now so you never know? Adam Pearson seemed to be the main person making things difficult for us and he's gone now. Nige won't be held to ransom that's for sure

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...