Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
chris_lcfc_85

Burnley home - Pre match

By chris_lcfc_85, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

LCFC FOX

LCFC FOX

Posted
Posted

Kasper

Moore

St Ledger

Morgan ©

Konchesky

Marshall

Danns

King (if fit) if not Drinkwater

Knockaert

Vardy

Beckford

subs: Logan, Schlupp, De Laet, Drinkwater (or James), Dyer, Futacs, Waghorn

marty78

marty78

Posted
Posted

Schmeichel

De Laet Morgan Moore Schlupp

Knockaert Drinwater James Marshall

Nugent Futacs

Subs: Logan, Konchesky, St Ledger, Danns, Dyer, Waghorn, Vardy

King will surely miss out even if he only felt his hamstring and I can't see him being risked for this one. Schlupp in for the out of form Konchesky and to give him a start at left back. Futacs in just for a change to the strike force and hopefully his height can be useful in both boxes but I wouldn't mind seeing either Waghorn or Beckford get started instead of Futacs or Nugent. Dyer to miss out for Knockaert, who deserves a start.

Guppy

Guppy

Posted
Posted

Kasper

Moore

Whitbread

Morgan

Konchesky

Knockaert

Drinkwater

James/ King

Marshall

Waghorn

Futacs

Subs: Logan, De Laet, James/ Danns, Wellens, Dyer, Nugent, Vardy.

Captain...

Captain...

Posted
Posted

Jason Bourne â€@JasonBourne1986

Nigel Pearson has told us that Neil Danns will be in the squad tomorrow. #LCFC

That probably means King is definitely out.

Can't see Danns starting though, unless we go 3 in the middle, but that is unlikely as 442 works for us at home.

James for King,

Knocky in for Dyer, Beckford in for Nuge or Vardy, shake things up might be the change we need to kick start our scoring spree.

Wouldn't change back 4 unless Whitbread is fit, especially as we will be forced into some other changes, Schlupp and Futacs on the bench.

We will win this one, I just hope it is a good un and we bag some goals.

foxesfan1989

foxesfan1989

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't mind Danns starting but I agree that he will almost certainly be on the bench. Would quite like to mix things up upfront, whether that means Beckford or Futacs is the managers call, but I would like to see one or both start. I would probably change either Moore or De laet for SSL too. Obviously Knocky has to start, Dyer has no impact on games, I think 99% agree with that.

Simo86

Simo86

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't mind Danns starting but I agree that he will almost certainly be on the bench. Would quite like to mix things up upfront, whether that means Beckford or Futacs is the managers call, but I would like to see one or both start. I would probably change either Moore or De laet for SSL too. Obviously Knocky has to start, Dyer has no impact on games, I think 99% agree with that.

I wouldn't say he has no impact on games, but Knockaert has had more impact when coming on recently. Dyer will make a good impact sub, coming on when the opposition players are tired.

Captain...

Captain...

Posted
Posted

For all the criticism of Dyer from Sunday, I seem to remember him picking up the ball in the middle driving forwards with it and playing in the perfect ball behind the defence for Nugent to run onto and smash over, one of the better moments of the first half.

To say he had no impact is harsh, it wasn't his best game but he did ok.

Think Knocky should start, I just don't like Dyer becoming another scapegoat for impatient city fans to let their frustration out on if he does start.

marty78

marty78

Posted
Posted

People starting Schlupp at LB

Have a word with yourselves

I have and why not? Because you see him as a striker? Or because Konchesky's goal has sufficiently masked his poor form for you?

Guest Col city fan

Guest Col city fan

Posted
Posted

I have and why not? Because you see him as a striker? Or because Konchesky's goal has sufficiently masked his poor form for you?

Konchesky being criticised now.

Who next RDL?

:thumbup:

Is their ANY player that ain't the target of aggro at the moment? Except maybe Knocky?

At this rate we will not be able to field a team.

dynamark

dynamark

Posted
Posted

Like to see him there at some point during the game and not 10 minutes to go.Just got a feeling that might be his place,facing the play,quick and comfortable futher upfield

kingfox

kingfox

Posted
Posted

Konchesky being criticised now.

Who next RDL?

:thumbup:

Is their ANY player that ain't the target of aggro at the moment? Except maybe Knocky?

At this rate we will not be able to field a team.

People will turn on Morgan next after one poor performance, and call for George Taft.

Guest Col city fan

Guest Col city fan

Posted
Posted

People will turn on Morgan next after one poor performance, and call for George Taft.

The forum since Sunday has been insane...

Literally if we drop all the players suggested we should do we'd hardly have a team?

There have been threads on Konch, DD, Moore, Vardy to name but four.

I presume to be replaced with Schlupp, Danns, Whitbread? and Beckford....

Well Danns wasn't even on the bench on Saturday and Beckford wasn't brought on. Whitbread? Well Fook knows?

People are clamouring for a settled manager.. How about a settled first team?

There's an idea..

:thumbup:

marty78

marty78

Posted
Posted

Konchesky being criticised now.

Who next RDL?

:thumbup:

Is their ANY player that ain't the target of aggro at the moment? Except maybe Knocky?

At this rate we will not be able to field a team.

"Aggro"? Was my post an aggressive condemnation of Konchesky or his ability?

Do you think we should play the same eleven every week regardless of form?

Is it wrong that I think Konchesky is out of form despite the fact I haven't called him a useless cvnt or want him sold or a replacement bought in?

Maybe a DM would turn him into Ashley Cole though eh?

marty78

marty78

Posted
Posted

People will turn on Morgan next after one poor performance, and call for George Taft.

Says the man with one of our players listed as a victim in his signature.

Guest Col city fan

Guest Col city fan

Posted
Posted

"Aggro"? Was my post an aggressive condemnation of Konchesky or his ability?

Do you think we should play the same eleven every week regardless of form?

Is it wrong that I think Konchesky is out of form despite the fact I haven't called him a useless cvnt or want him sold or a replacement bought in?

Maybe a DM would turn him into Ashley Cole though eh?

Fookin Hell Marty calm down...!!

lol

Konch out!

:whistle:

marty78

marty78

Posted
Posted

The forum since Sunday has been insane...

Literally if we drop all the players suggested we should do we'd hardly have a team?

There have been threads on Konch, DD, Moore, Vardy to name but four.

I presume to be replaced with Schlupp, Danns, Whitbread? and Beckford....

Well Danns wasn't even on the bench on Saturday and Beckford wasn't brought on. Whitbread? Well Fook knows?

People are clamouring for a settled manager.. How about a settled first team?

There's an idea..

:thumbup:

So we go unchanged all season then? If not then at what point are personnel changes allowed to be suggested?

You are allowed to ramble incessantly about our tactics away from home but I can't suggest replacing the left back for a game or two?

Guest Col city fan

Guest Col city fan

Posted
Posted

So we go unchanged all season then? If not then at what point are personnel changes allowed to be suggested?

You are allowed to ramble incessantly about our tactics away from home but I can't suggest replacing the left back for a game or two?

I think it's reaching farcical proportions.

DD out!

Moore out!

Konch out!

Etc....

lol

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...