Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
trotterfox87

Players for next season, Who do want, Who's free?

By trotterfox87, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

KFS

KFS

Posted
Posted

Played with Harry Forrester years ago before he moved to Watford. Arrogant ****!

Watching this game he looks like a mouthy fvcker, but he's got bags of talent
dog_4

dog_4

Posted
Posted

I like the sound of Palacios and Izzaguirre and both Honduran! I'd also like to see Baptiste,Jerome Thomas and Ebanks Blake!

Shauno45

Shauno45

Posted
Posted

Van Aanholt currently on loan at Vitesse from Chelsea, with them being linked with "10mil rated left back Luke Shaw from Saints" surely pushes him further back in the pecking order?, J.Thomas and definitely an offer for SEB, a proven championship striker. seeing as were not gonna be splashing the cash he'd chip in with a fair few.

peach0000

peach0000

Posted
Posted

For an LB Izzaguire from Celtic proper quality

If also get a CDM like Wilson palacios from stoke

I feel we need a 20+ ST and I would try get

Yakubu back from playing in China

And lastly baptiste at CB if he signs

Wood

VLC86

VLC86

Posted
Posted

Steve Harper "open to offers".

Would he be that good reserve keeper we could do with?

May be the first choice is Kasper leaves and Pearson will know him from his time at Newcastle.

Paddy Madden.

lol I was waiting for this to emerge. Better off sticking with Vardy

peach0000

peach0000

Posted
Posted

luis suarez loan he has 6 games left of ban if we let him see out those 6 games at leicester then play him for 2 or 3 it would benefit liverpool and they would get him back quicker might be pointless tho

beemeroo

beemeroo

Posted
Posted

luis suarez loan he has 6 games left of ban if we let him see out those 6 games at leicester then play him for 2 or 3 it would benefit liverpool and they would get him back quicker might be pointless tho

Genuinely wouldn't want the filthy scrote at my club. Ability or not.

Simo86

Simo86

Posted
Posted

luis suarez loan he has 6 games left of ban if we let him see out those 6 games at leicester then play him for 2 or 3 it would benefit liverpool and they would get him back quicker might be pointless tho

:crylaugh:

Comedy genius!! 

Adster

Adster

Posted
Posted

Genuinely wouldn't want the filthy scrote at my club. Ability or not.

 

 

Get real. Anyone who wouldn't want a 20-goal a season Premier League striker, "ability or not" is a total moron. 

ian the fox

ian the fox

Posted
Posted

an

 

Get real. Anyone who wouldn't want a 20-goal a season Premier League striker, "ability or not" is a total moron. 

 

 that all depends if you have any moral principles or not ....

Xen

Xen

Posted
Posted

luis suarez loan he has 6 games left of ban if we let him see out those 6 games at leicester then play him for 2 or 3 it would benefit liverpool and they would get him back quicker might be pointless tho

 

God no.

 

He's banned for a reason, and if Liverpool tried circumventing the ban by shipping him off on loan for some of it, that's pretty despicable. I'd be damn disappointed if LCFC decided to facilitate in that. Disgusting.

Mark_w

Mark_w

Posted
Posted

Get real. Anyone who wouldn't want a 20-goal a season Premier League striker, "ability or not" is a total moron. 

 

That's nonsense. If someone is only bothered about success then yes it'd be moronic to not want Suarez. But personally I'd rather we didn't bring a racist into the club no matter how good he is, we'd have been a better side during the Play-Offs with Wayne Brown but I'd have been disgusted if we'd stuck by him. It's not all about winning and winning just wouldn't be as enjoyable when it comes as a result of exploiting a ban someone has received for biting another footballer. Especially when that person is such a vile human being.

 

Edit: Yes I'm aware that the idea isn't serious and couldn't happen.

Adster

Adster

Posted
Posted

That's nonsense. If someone is only bothered about success then yes it'd be moronic to not want Suarez. But personally I'd rather we didn't bring a racist into the club no matter how good he is, we'd have been a better side during the Play-Offs with Wayne Brown but I'd have been disgusted if we'd stuck by him. It's not all about winning and winning just wouldn't be as enjoyable when it comes as a result of exploiting a ban someone has received for biting another footballer. Especially when that person is such a vile human being.

I am bothered about success, who isn't? Obviously i'm not totally void from the fact morals and ethics are important in football but I for one and I'm sure many others would agree with me (whether they'd admit it on here or not) would jump at the chance to sign a world class player, regardless of their past antics. 

Whether it'd be worth it for 6 games or so, probably not. But you get my gist. 

Wymsey

Wymsey

Posted
Posted

luis suarez loan he has 6 games left of ban if we let him see out those 6 games at leicester then play him for 2 or 3 it would benefit liverpool and they would get him back quicker might be pointless tho

 

Sorry, but this has one of the most ridiculous posts I've ever read on Foxestalk for a good old while and that's some 'achievement').

 

It's 99.999999999999999999999999999999999% certain that Suarez won't come here for the following reasons:

 

1.) His wages will be about 4/5 times as large as the whole of our best starting 11.

 

2.) This won't be viable, as we should be looking to trim our wage bill (considering as the financial fair play system comes into place soon).

 

3.) His ban means, I believe, he can't play any domestic game for any English club (that's why QPR's Joey Barton moved abroad earlier this season- as is was able to play in the French league; as this league isn't controlled by the English FA, the football assiociation that banned Barton for 12 games).

morris1234

morris1234

Posted
Posted

I've heard ronaldo is unhappy at real, and man utd can't decide so why not loan him to us until they get enough money together.

Sorted!

Oh wait he dives too much, never mind!

peach0000

peach0000

Posted
Posted

God no.

 

He's banned for a reason, and if Liverpool tried circumventing the ban by shipping him off on loan for some of it, that's pretty despicable. I'd be damn disappointed if LCFC decided to facilitate in that. Disgusting.

 

Maybe he could play in a muzzle problem solved.

Sorry, but this has one of the most ridiculous posts I've ever read on Foxestalk for a good old while and that's some 'achievement').

 

It's 99.999999999999999999999999999999999% certain that Suarez won't come here for the following reasons:

 

1.) His wages will be about 4/5 times as large as the whole of our best starting 11.

 

2.) This won't be viable, as we should be looking to trim our wage bill (considering as the financial fair play system comes into place soon).

 

3.) His ban means, I believe, he can't play any domestic game for any English club (that's why QPR's Joey Barton moved abroad earlier this season- as is was able to play in the French league; as this league isn't controlled by the English FA, the football assiociation that banned Barton for 12 games).

Because the FL starts earlier than the PL they will play 3 games before the premier league starts therefore liverpool pay his wages we have him for 2 games and they get him back a game early everyone wins. Plus i was joking.

dogadug

dogadug

Posted
Posted

Maybe he could play in a muzzle problem solved.

Because the FL starts earlier than the PL they will play 3 games before the premier league starts therefore liverpool pay his wages we have him for 2 games and they get him back a game early everyone wins. Plus i was joking.

 

Why are you still trying to argue the point then?!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...