Electricity Sports 1960 Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Beckford, Danns, Waghorn, Gallagher, Drinkwater, Wellens, St. Ledger, to go.Any surprises there?Any others should be on the list?(From Daily Telegraph, Sports Section, page S7, today, Wednesday May 29th)
Bettsj2 Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Beckford, Danns, Waghorn, Gallagher, Drinkwater, Wellens, St. Ledger, to go. Any surprises there? Any others should be on the list? (From Daily Telegraph) Quite suprised at Drinky being in there. He was one of the better players in the first half of the season.
Simo86 Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Drinkwater? Surely not. Yeah he had a poor 2nd half of the season, but he is a young lad with plenty of potential. He'd definitely make a good squad player and I doubt he'll be on big wages.
Ricey Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 I'd keep Waghorn but the rest I'm not fussed about. Drinkwater is too slow, that won't improve, so if we can cash-in then we should.
Babylon Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Drinkwater is a strange one, the rest are hardly a surprise... I'm sure they all knew that last season!
RowlattsFox Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 I think James and Drinkater are similar players, in terms of style but James is better. If we want to bring a more physical centre midfielder in then we will probably need to let one go, that with the potential emergence of Cain. Probably bullshit, mind.
Happy Fox Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 What about Vardy!?!?!?!?!? No point selling him, would be a useful back up striker albeit 4th choice I expect we will sign a striker in the transfer window, with Schlupp being deployed as a LB/LW.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Definately not Drinky or Waggy but otherwise not fussed
Leicester_Numan Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Beckford, Danns, Waghorn, Gallagher, Drinkwater, Wellens, St. Ledger, to go. Any surprises there? Any others should be on the list? (From Daily Telegraph) Konchesky for Drinkwater is more likely
Mark_w Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 There's no way we'll be getting rid of Drinkwater, surely? Think it'd be silly to get rid of Waghorn rather than Vardy or Futacs as well.
indierich06 Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Beckford, Danns, Waghorn, Gallagher, Drinkwater, Wellens, St. Ledger, to go. Any surprises there? Any others should be on the list? (From Daily Telegraph) Is there a link to this anywhere?
FrankieADZ Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Is there a link to this anywhere? or even if someone could post a photo of the article would be good.
Leicester_Numan Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 With Waggy being one of the first signings under the Thai's, we don't know what kind of contract he's on. Could be on the way out simply because of wages
Simo86 Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 With Waggy being one of the first signings under the Thai's, we don't know what kind of contract he's on. Could be on the way out simply because of wages I doubt he'll be on that much
RowlattsFox Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Why are some surprised that Waggy may be let go? He's barely had a kick for the second half the season, barely even on the bench. So clearly NP no longer rates him or, without wanting to start rumours, they have 'fell out'.
Cropwellfox Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Stating they are free to leave one thing, getting them off the books quite another thing entirely - wouldn't be at all surprised if at least half of the list are still our players come August.
Simo86 Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Why? Sunderland trainee so he wouldn't be on a great deal before we signed him. Just because he was the thais first signing doesn't mean he's going to be given the earth, plus the thais aren't the ones offering the contracts out. Say he was on 1k at Sunderland, I'm sure us offering him 4-5k would persuade him to sign for a club he's already played at and knows.
kingfox Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 WHAT DID YOU SAY DRINKWATER but need to see an actual link first.
Happy Fox Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 We would need to bring in 2 central midfielders then, if we let go of Danns, Wellens and Drinkwater. I say 2 because I can see Cain being promoted from the Under 21's.
theessexfox Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 Sunderland trainee so he wouldn't be on a great deal before we signed him. Just because he was the thais first signing doesn't mean he's going to be given the earth, plus the thais aren't the ones offering the contracts out. Say he was on 1k at Sunderland, I'm sure us offering him 4-5k would persuade him to sign for a club he's already played at and knows. That sort of thing didn't stop us handing out silly wages all over the shop elsewhere, who knows?
Mark_w Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 WHAT DID YOU SAY DRINKWATER but need to see an actual link first. I thought you'd decided you liked him?
Simo86 Posted 29 May 2013 Posted 29 May 2013 That sort of thing didn't stop us handing out silly wages all over the shop elsewhere, who knows? They were to players already on a relatively high wage already though
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.