OakFox12 Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Its gonna be interesting to see if Danns comes back into the starting eleven.. Has he got something to offer we have been missing?
Guest MattP Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Yes he has. A below average championship ability for a central midfield player, a array of chavtastic tweets and he could do the end of season disco no problem.
The Year Of The Fox Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Yes if he plays like he did against Derby away two seasons ago
Trav Le Bleu Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 It's been missing so long we don't even miss what we've missed. So no.
StanSP Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 No. He may be training with us etc, but that's only to get him fit should he 1) ever be needed for us or 2) be sold off. It's harder to sell an unfit player than it is a fit one. I really can't see him playing for us. If we can't get rid permanently this transfer window, a loan deal beckons.
GingerrrFox Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Danns will play a part this season. Got a feeling Nigel will give him a shot.
OakFox12 Posted 18 July 2013 Author Posted 18 July 2013 Danns will play a part this season. Got a feeling Nigel will give him a shot.. I was thinking the same especially because he wanted him at hull so I couldn't put what happend last season together.. If we decide to sell do we bring in another central midfielder?
Leicester_Numan Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 It would be entirely up to him, he knows that Pearson wants to see the right attitude in training, desire to play and hard work & commitment when he does play. If he shows that in the pre-season games he could force his way back in. That doesn't alter the fact that his wages are too high and we need to sell him. It would make it easier to do so if he was playing and doing well though
Brooksy Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Hopefully not. He's a below average championship midfielder at best and I don't understand why so many of our fans want to give him a chance.
lgfualol Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Not if it means the King/James partnership doesnt happen.
kingfox Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 No. Get him off the wage bill and be done with, it will help. And if he is given a second chance, it's Drinkwater who should be sold. Both of them shouldn't stay, because I don't have confidence in either.
OakFox12 Posted 18 July 2013 Author Posted 18 July 2013 Not if it means the King/James. partnership doesnt happen. James came on a lot towards the end of last season aswell as king really liked the look of it and it seemed to have a balance exited to see more of this season
sdb Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Serves a purpose for certain games but i'd imagine his wages would be generous for being just bit-part. Be good to get stuck into the more physical sides who tend to roll us over, but he's pretty poor position & movement wise imo.
jock2612 Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Yes, i think he does have something to offer.I would rather see Wellens and Gally leave before Danns
Fox92 Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 I think he'd be useful as a squad player, but nothing more.
MPH Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 I think he'd be useful as a squad player, but nothing more. I agree he would make an able understudy should injuries happen, but can we afford the luxury of someone earning 20k a week whilst sitting on the bench? It does make you wonder why Pearson seems to of made drinkwater available and not so much Danns, though...
FoxesFan123 Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 He's a good player, was a great player at Palace, wasn't bad for us as well but everyone just assumes he was crap as he didn't play at the end of the season. I think Pearson would like him, as someone stated he was wanted at Hull, BUT I don't think he's played because of FFP. He's on massive wages (we beat Rangers when in Champs league to his signature) and also big appearance bonus / triggers. We simply can't afford to play him and he needs to move off our wage bill
GingerrrFox Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Beckford's gone and the fee to Everton has basically been paid off now. We are apparently just within the FFP regulations so it's conceivable that if Nigel doesn't think he can get a midfielder better than Danns or as good as him into the squad that he keeps him because we can now afford to.
Leicester_Numan Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Beckford's gone and the fee to Everton has basically been paid off now. We are apparently just within the FFP regulations so it's conceivable that if Nigel doesn't think he can get a midfielder better than Danns or as good as him into the squad that he keeps him because we can now afford to.I also think that selling Beckford has put us inside FFP but that's not enough, we still have to get rid of 1, preferably 2 to bring anyone else in. We could strengthen central defence and get that 3rd choice striker for Danns's wage
GingerrrFox Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 I also think that selling Beckford has put us inside FFP but that's not enough, we still have to get rid of 1, preferably 2 to bring anyone else in. We could strengthen central defence and get that 3rd choice striker for Danns's wage And be left with just James/King/Drinkwater in central midfield. Last season showed you need depth in the centre of midfield and we lacked energy towards the end of last season. Wellens is as good as gone in that even if he doesn't leave he's not cut out for this level anymore. We won't sign a new striker we have Wood/Nugent/Schlupp/Waghorn/Vardy. We will sign a CB, in our current financial condition we can stretch to that.
Fox42 Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Lets build up Danns and Wellens for the first couple of games of the season, score and assist and then sell them for millions before the deadline day
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.