hornyhollthefox123 Posted 13 August 2013 Posted 13 August 2013 IMO NP will never play Schlupp and Knockaert/Marshall in the same side in a 352. He'll want complete solidarity either from the three playing in the middle currently or solidarity from a left wing back. Although Konchesky doesn't exactly get the heart racing when he attacks he provides stability and composure on the ball. I think it'll be: Kasper Moore Morgan Whitbread De Laet Konchesky James Drinkwater Knockaert Vardy Nugent
sylofox Posted 13 August 2013 Posted 13 August 2013 Away at Derby and it isn't on Sky! Yet. Would you stick with the same side that worked at Boro or maybe shake it up and bring some more attacking players on? Give the new, or old, signings a chance like Miquel, Bakayogo and Danns? Would you like to see good ol' 4-4-2 back? Or Whitbreads' big ginger head on a spike? What will the score be and what are the dangers the Sheep Shaggers pose? All reasonable questions to dissect and discuss like the gentleman I know you all are None as long as your not walking around on your own in a sheep skin coat. Oh and smelling of last night's kebab. lol
emmo1987 Posted 13 August 2013 Posted 13 August 2013 Nigels team 352 Schmeichel moore morgan whitbread de laet konchesky drinkwater james king nugent wood mine Schmeichel de laet moore morgan konchesky king james drinkwater marshall nugent vardy 433 Logan, Whitbread, waghorn, schlupp, dyer, wood, knockaert
Jakemoore Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 Schmeichel Moore - Morgan - Miquel De Laet - James - King - Schlupp Knockaert Nugent - Vardy These are shit, get it on the deck and go at the cvnts. This.
Kitchandro Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 Stick with the same side (except Schlupp for Konch), stick with 5-3-2 and grind out a bore draw. I'm more than happy to do that away from home. At home, I want to see us playing more attractive football. Winning at home, drawing away will see us into the play-offs I would suspect. Firstly, trying to grind out draws doesn't suit us. Like a typical English team we can only really play at full pelt, we suffer if we try to do anything else. It was noticeable last season that we struggled in matches where we had a slow start, yet rarely got pegged back when we scored first. Though I'm wary of Derby's tendency to start the season well and the fact they do have some dangerous players, I'm convinced our best 11 is better than their's. Moreover, I don't really accept trying to play for a draw in any match, that's not what footballing philosophy should be about. Especially against one of our most hated rivals, and a team who we've got a great recent record against.
Kitchandro Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 Schmeichel Moore - Morgan - Miquel De Laet - James - King - Schlupp Knockaert Nugent - Vardy These are shit, get it on the deck and go at the cvnts.
LCFC FOX Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 Kasper Moore Morgan Whitbread De Laet James Drinkwater Bakayogo Marshall King Knockaert Nugent Logan, Miquel, Dyer, Schlupp, Gallagher, Waghorn, Wood
Bilsthorpe Blue Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 Kasper Moore Morgan Whitbread De Laet James Drinkwater Bakayogo Marshall King Knockaert Nugent Logan, Miquel, Dyer, Schlupp, Gallagher, Waghorn, Wood would love this but I dont think the referee would!
AnotherShitSeason Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 My prediction: DCFC 2 - 0 LCFC Defence: Competent Midfield: Ineffectual Strikers: Frustrated Shots On Target: 2 Youngy's Mood: Agitated Nigel's Special Move in the Post Match Interview: The shoulder shrug Foxes Talk Post Match Mood: Squabbling over false positives
Dan Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 schlupps wasted in that position imo, he wont be able to get into the box enough, id put dyer out there instead. Arguably, but I still think going forward he'd be a better option than Konchesky. I'd rather us have winger type players there than full backs. I know De Laet's a full back but he's always played more like an attacking wide player rather than defensive, he's made for the role. Schlupp may not be great but I think he'd offer more than Konchesky. Dyer I'd play if he actually gets himself involved, but too often he doesn't.
LcFc_Smiv Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 Think Nige will stick with Shitbread as he clearly rates him. So would expect close to an unchanged team, with maybe Wood pushing for a start. Whitbread didn't do anything to deserve getting cut, if anyone should be benched it should be Konch. Unsure whether it will be Vardy or Wood up top, Vardy for me was good with little service. Woods reaction to being on the bench was encouraging, but does 20 minutes merit to go straight back in or should he prove himself one more time? Arguably, but I still think going forward he'd be a better option than Konchesky. I'd rather us have winger type players there than full backs. I know De Laet's a full back but he's always played more like an attacking wide player rather than defensive, he's made for the role. Schlupp may not be great but I think he'd offer more than Konchesky. Dyer I'd play if he actually gets himself involved, but too often he doesn't. The problem is when it comes to Dyer is that we move sideways and backwards, this doesn't aid his game at all. Dyer needs the ball playing in front of him so he can run on to it and get his legs going. However we tend to play the ball to him when he's in little space, static, or on to his right foot, which is good for trapping the ball and little else. Get up the field quickly and knock the ball into space a bit in front of him so he can burst on to it and he'll tear the defense apart.
tommyh Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 id go with this: SCHMEICHEL MOORE MORGAN MIGUEL DE LAET JAMES MARSHALL DYER KNOCKAERT WOOD NUGENT subs: Logan, Whitbread, Konchesky, Drinkwater, King, Schlupp, Vardy, De Laet and Dyer not wingbacks but wingers, James just holding and breaking play up (not really going over the half way line), giving Marshall an attacking license. Also 3 up top.... more or less telling Knockaert to be based on the right of the 3 but more or less go where ever he wants and tell Nugent to play as close to Wood as possible!!
shade Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 My prediction: DCFC 2 - 0 LCFC Defence: Competent Midfield: Ineffectual Strikers: Frustrated Shots On Target: 2 Youngy's Mood: Agitated Nigel's Special Move in the Post Match Interview: The shoulder shrug Foxes Talk Post Match Mood: Squabbling over false positives AnotherShitSeason's Post: Predictably boring.
Swalker Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 4-4-2 please!!! 3-5-2 is too negative and means Marshall, dyer and knocky are all but ineffective and these 3 are 3 of the top wingers in the league
nickelbyfox Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 IMO NP will never play Schlupp and Knockaert/Marshall in the same side in a 352. He'll want complete solidarity either from the three playing in the middle currently or solidarity from a left wing back. Although Konchesky doesn't exactly get the heart racing when he attacks he provides stability and composure on the ball. I think it'll be: Kasper Moore Morgan Whitbread De Laet Konchesky James Drinkwater Knockaert Vardy Nugent This for me - but Dyer rather than Konchesky (however being away from home I doubt he will risk it)
Monsell1976 Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 My prediction: DCFC 2 - 0 LCFC Defence: Competent Midfield: Ineffectual Strikers: Frustrated Shots On Target: 2 Youngy's Mood: Agitated Nigel's Special Move in the Post Match Interview: The shoulder shrug Foxes Talk Post Match Mood: Squabbling over false positives 😂 Till Sundays negative, or should I say safety minded display I would have disagreed, but now you might be right.I have never been a fan of Nigel but up until Sunday I thought he had changed, and didn't think he would play negative safe football as it clearly doesn't work, especially away, as was proven last year. The jury is out for me again, as the system used is supposed to create chances as it brings the wing backs forward more, but on Sunday the personnel used made it such a negative system with little or no chances created. For me if he sets up Saturday as he did last Sunday, and I have to endure another 90 min of negative football, I for one will not be wasting anymore money on away games until he wakes up to the fact we need to be attacking, and not scared of losing. With the right personnel in this system, we have the players who can create, and we could easly beat most teams in this league. BE BRAVE NIGEL.
stevelcfc Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 Schmeichel Moore - Morgan - Whitbread De Laet - James - King - Zoom Knockaert Nugent - Vardy
Harry - LCFC Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 My prediction: DCFC 2 - 0 LCFC Defence: Competent Midfield: Ineffectual Strikers: Frustrated Shots On Target: 2 Youngy's Mood: Agitated Nigel's Special Move in the Post Match Interview: The shoulder shrug Foxes Talk Post Match Mood: Squabbling over false positives ASS Watch: Grinningly smugly in the corner
Leicesterpool Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 What about this Kasper Morgan Moore James De Laet Konchesky King Marshall Nugent Vardy Schlupp Bench: Logan, Whitbread, Danns, Dyer, Knockaert, Wood & Drinkwater. Thoughts please?
Loggy88 Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 I would bring in Wood for Vardy. Then Knockeart in for someone but can't make my mind up who.
Swalker Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 343 all the way!! suits us down to the ground good shout!! 343 would suit us better than 352
Swalker Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 I would bring in Wood for Vardy. Then Knockeart in for someone but can't make my mind up who. Have you not been to a game this season/pre season? Vardy is looking one of our best players and can't be dropped atm!
foxfanazer Posted 14 August 2013 Posted 14 August 2013 2-2 draw is my prediction. Wood in for either Vardy or Nuge and Knocky in for James. I really like James but he has been ineffective at the start of this season, sure he'll come good though. Stick with the 3-5-2 as I think it suits us away from home but needs scrapping or tweaking at home because if teams come for a draw then I struggle to see how we will win games playing that way
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.