Harry - LCFC Posted 17 October 2014 Posted 17 October 2014 The quiz is for the 2010 election. It's a little less relevant but you should still have a good idea of what party represents you best by doing it.
Guest MattP Posted 17 October 2014 Posted 17 October 2014 The quiz is for the 2010 election. It's a little less relevant but you should still have a good idea of what party represents you best by doing it. Manifestos will be vastly different though going into next year, the political scene is changing like it never has before and the parties are reacting to that, all three of the main parties will be offering very different things they did in 2010.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 17 October 2014 Posted 17 October 2014 modern politicians are a joke. Although when someone mentioned that Boris Jonson did not know the price of a pint of milk he was defended by the Tories on here (because he is a Tory no doubt) I would rather Labour had a stronger leader. They make it easy for that smug poseur Cameron. You want the country to plunge further into debt then Ken. Why do you think all the cuts are now taking place? Labour spent money they didn't have, and that's why we are all paying the price now. It will be an economic catastrophe, should they get back in, but I pray the electorate will not let this happen.
purpleronnie Posted 17 October 2014 Posted 17 October 2014 You want the country to plunge further into debt then Ken. Why do you think all the cuts are now taking place? Labour spent money they didn't have, and that's why we are all paying the price now. It will be an economic catastrophe, should they get back in, but I pray the electorate will not let this happen. You understand that the worldwide financial crisis created most of the debt?
Dr The Singh Posted 17 October 2014 Posted 17 October 2014 You understand that the worldwide financial crisis created most of the debt?Come of it Ronnie, your not expecting DT know anything beyond his own bubble
Webbo Posted 17 October 2014 Posted 17 October 2014 You understand that the worldwide financial crisis created most of the debt? I believe that debt and the fact that there was no probable chance of it being repaid caused the the financial crisis.
Rincewind Posted 17 October 2014 Posted 17 October 2014 RMLP heres a couple of links No doubt a waste of time. https://twitter.com/Independent/status/523183512061362177?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=Jenny_Musings&utm_content=523183702499934208 Ihttp://imajsaclaimant.wordpress.com/2014/10/14/the-secret-sanctions/
benpicko Posted 20 October 2014 Posted 20 October 2014 http://uk.isidewith.com/political-quiz?utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=q_uk_4t This one's out of date but still as recent as I can find.
bovril Posted 20 October 2014 Posted 20 October 2014 I did one of these but I think my results were skewed by putting 'less important' to almost everything.
David Guiza Posted 20 October 2014 Posted 20 October 2014 Liberal Democrats on foreign policy, economic, healthcare, transportation, and education issues.compare answers 81% Labour on foreign policy, healthcare, and immigration issues.compare answers 73% Scottish Nationals on foreign policy, healthcare, and environmental issues.compare answers 71% Plaid Cymru on social, foreign policy, and healthcare issues.compare answers 66% Green on foreign policy, environmental, and healthcare issues.compare answers 59% Conservatives on economic, immigration, and transportation issues.compare answers 34% UK Independence on education, immigration, and economic issues.compare answers 33% British Nationals on immigration, economic, and healthcare issues. Not entirely sure how that happened. I'd probably put myself most towards the Greens if at all.
lavrentis Posted 20 October 2014 Posted 20 October 2014 British Nationals on immigration, economic, and healthcare issues. Not entirely sure how that happened. I'd probably put myself most towards the Greens if at all. nice avatar
David Guiza Posted 20 October 2014 Posted 20 October 2014 nice avatar Haha, well if you read up on Guevara you'd see that he stood for equal rights to the people, against capitalism and materialism. Perhaps not the ideal way to go about things, but being castigated by mainstream American media for being a 'commy' never helps anyone. Not entirely sure how answering that immigrants should get free emergency health care but should be deported if they engage in terrorist activity makes that BNP though. Probably the same reason that answering that there should be more devolved powers makes me a Scottish Nationalist.
bovril Posted 20 October 2014 Posted 20 October 2014 Haha, well if you read up on Guevara you'd see that he stood for equal rights to the people, against capitalism and materialism. Perhaps not the ideal way to go about things, but being castigated by mainstream American media for being a 'commy' never helps anyone. Not entirely sure how answering that immigrants should get free emergency health care but should be deported if they engage in terrorist activity makes that BNP though. Probably the same reason that answering that there should be more devolved powers makes me a Scottish Nationalist. He was also a puritanically Marxist mass-murderer. But each to their own. (That's Che not Alex Salmond)
David Guiza Posted 20 October 2014 Posted 20 October 2014 He was also a puritanically Marxist mass-murderer. But each to their own. (That's Che not Alex Salmond) Just about every iconic political leader in history has blood on their hands, Thatcher, Churchil, JFK etc. Guevara was literal of course, as opposed to starting illegal wars, permitting the killing of innocent civilians etc. As I said, obviously there's better way to go about things, but he saw what capitalism had done to the poor workers of Latin America and fought for their cause - I don't think placards, a silent protest and a hunger strike would have solved the crisis that was Cuba during its military dictatorship, but as you say, each to their own.
absolutelegend Posted 20 October 2014 Posted 20 October 2014 How can anybody side with labour when they don't appear to have any policies?
Carl the Llama Posted 20 October 2014 Posted 20 October 2014 Parties you side with... 78% Green on healthcare, foreign policy, social, environmental, economic, and immigration issues. compare answers 77% Liberal Democrats on foreign policy, healthcare, social, and economic issues. compare answers 63% Labour on foreign policy and social issues. compare answers 61% Scottish Nationals on social, foreign policy, and environmental issues. compare answers 43% Plaid Cymru on foreign policy issues. compare answers 12% Conservatives no major issues. compare answers 11% British Nationals on economic issues. compare answers 9% UK Independence no major issues. compare answers Left as fvck.
digitalalba Posted 23 October 2014 Posted 23 October 2014 UK Independence on economic, immigration, foreign policy, and healthcare issues.compare answers 67% British Nationals on foreign policy, immigration, and healthcare issues.compare answers 62% Labour on environmental and education issues.compare answers 55% Conservatives on immigration issues.compare answers 54% Scottish Nationals on education issues.compare answers 46% Liberal Democrats on healthcare and social issues.compare answers 43% Plaid Cymru on education and transportation issues.compare answers 39% Green on transportation issues.compare answers Strange, UKIP 71%, I could not see myself voting UKIP, certainly not whilst Farage is still a Bankster, and I hate Labour - 3rd???
purpleronnie Posted 28 October 2014 Posted 28 October 2014 Interesting article in the telegraph about immigration and the misguided view that Norway and Switzerland are a good example of border control. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/11190269/If-EU-migration-is-the-problem-Switzerland-and-Norway-are-not-the-answer.html If EU migration is the problem, Switzerland and Norway are not the answer Since both Switzerland and Norway accept far more immigrants per capita than the UK, why do so many people look to them as the answer to Britain's immigration worries?{C}{C} If Britain wants to reduce immigration, following the Switzerland route isn't the way to go about it Photo: PA By Mats Persson 2:24PM GMT 27 Oct 2014 719 Comments In the Spectator recently, Daniel Hannan set out what he thinks David Cameron should say in the great speech announcing he’s willing to contemplate Brexit: "Like Switzerland, we shall continue to participate fully in the European market." (Switzerland doesn’t actually “fully” participate in the European market in services, but let’s leave that one aside for now). Farage has constantly called for the UK to leave the EU and "become like Switzerland", while some Better Off Outers also cling to the idea that the UK should become like Norway. At the same time though, immigration and border control are now the most frequently cited reasons for leaving the EU – or at least that’s how the debate is framed, and Cameron has been struggling to come up with answers. This is actually very odd, since Switzerland and Norway both accept more EU migrants per capita than the UK. In fact, many more. In 2012, according to Eurostat, gross EU immigration to Switzerland was 90,107. This amounts to a gross inflow of 11.33 EU migrants per 1000 of its population. In comparison, gross EU migration to the UK was 157,554, but only at a rate of 2.48 per 1000 of its population. Norway, in the European Economic Area, also had a rate of gross EU immigration far higher than the UK, with 7.38 EU migrants per 1000 of its population. Related Articles Would Ukip's plan to quit the EU really cut immigration? 27 Oct 2014 Fallon: Claims of immigrants swamping towns were careless 27 Oct 2014 Fallon admits 'careless' immigration comments 27 Oct 2014 Towns in the UK are 'swamped' by EU migrants, Cabinet minister warns 26 Oct 2014 In other words, if the UK had the same rate of EU immigration as Switzerland in 2012, the gross inflow of EU migration would have been 719,248 rather than the actual figure of 157,554. That’s just over four and a half times more. The stocks of foreign-born people in each country tell a similar story. Both countries have higher foreign-born populations than the EU average, but Switzerland’s is much larger than the UK’s. Those born within the EU account for 15 per cent of Switzerland’s population while in the UK it is only 4.19 per cent, much closer to the EU average of 3.45 per cent. Yes, but the point, I hear you say, is that Switzerland and Norway have much more democratic control over their immigration policy than the UK. This is only semi-true for Switzerland. And Norway, which is outside the EU but inside the European Economic Area and Schengen, arguably has less control over its borders than the UK – exactly the same free movement rules but no votes on these rules. Switzerland is more complicated. The country is outside the EU but subject to almost the same free movement rules as the UK (via the bilateral Free Movement of Persons Agreement, which will give citizens of Bulgaria and Romania full access to the Swiss Labour market as of 31 May 2016 at the latest). In a referendum in February, the Swiss voted to introduce quotas on EU migrants from 2017. However, the EU has so far refused to agree to this and has threatened to suspend its other bilateral agreements with the country if it unilaterally imposes quotas. You can argue that due to the UK’s size, it would be in a much stronger position to strike a deal. However, what you cannot do is to hail Norway and Switzerland as “some of the most successful countries in the world outside the EU” on the one hand, and fail to mention that both of them accept more EU migrants per head than the UK on the other. Ukip’s new frontman, Douglas Carswell, has hailed Switzerland as a great example to follow on immigration. “It is no coincidence,” he has said, “that two of the countries with the best immigration systems I can think of – Switzerland and Australia – are both outside the EU.” As it turns out, the Swiss model doesn’t involve full control of its own borders and, if you extrapolate it to the UK, it would mean the UK accepting roughly 390,000 more EU migrants net per year
Guest MattP Posted 28 October 2014 Posted 28 October 2014 As he been stated numerous times, I don't people have a problem with immigration per se, however they do have a problem with the quality of immigrant we attract. I've not met anyone who been to Switzerland and not think we should be copying a lot of things that they do.
Rincewind Posted 28 October 2014 Posted 28 October 2014 Not checked it out yet but just seen a link to Sky News that Lloyds are closing 200 branches with 9000 job losses
Strokes Posted 28 October 2014 Posted 28 October 2014 As he been stated numerous times, I don't people have a problem with immigration per se, however they do have a problem with the quality of immigrant we attract. I've not met anyone who been to Switzerland and not think we should be copying a lot of things that they do. Totally agree. Don't be fooled that the pro EU supporters dont understand this argument, they refuse to acknowledge it because they have no answer to it.
MooseBreath Posted 28 October 2014 Posted 28 October 2014 Totally agree. Don't be fooled that the pro EU supporters dont understand this argument, they refuse to acknowledge it because they have no answer to it. Most of the more incompatible immigrant cultures are from outside of the EU.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.