Vlad the Fox Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 Ha ha goal line technology nearly causing a riot.
Finnegan Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 Why are the commentary team acting like it's confusing? The replay shows the ball goes over for an own goal. It's very clear.
Haydos Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 Why are they blowing this out of proportion? Goal. End of.
potter3 Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 I don't understand why anyone is confused by this. I don't usually mind Jonathon Pearce, but fuck me he is being thick.
RowlattsFox Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 Still not convinced it went over but technology says it did so will have to assume it did.
eye666 Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 Jonathan Pearce is so shit. What's he on about - "goal technology will be discussed again"? Obviously over the line.
Vacamion Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 My missus just piped up that there is no problem with goal line technology, it's just that the Commentators are thick as pigshit. Spot on.
Unabomber Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 I am getting so mad at Jonathan Pearce atm he is genuinely beginning to ruin my evening.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 Didn't look an obvious goal without the technology. One of the first instances I've seen of it being useful.
MooseBreath Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 Worked perfectly, the ref gave it correctly almost instantly. Commentator is being very dumb.
wakeyfox01 Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 It was a goal, but they made a complete mess showing it was.
The Doctor Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 I don't understand why anyone is confused by this. Because the goalline tech showed it hit the post first time and didn't cross, and the commentators are complete melts and don't realise that if it's not in you play on.
Jimothy Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 What the **** is Jonathan Pearce on about? "Which replay do we believe?" "It says no goal and they've changed they're mind." It hit the post, didn't cross the line, hit the keeper and did. He's going on like the technology is giving two deferent answer. It's a different instance where it's saying it's not and saying it is.
Finnegan Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 Now they're putting doubt on the technology - which England wanted and which just showed it works - because it's not the one that's used in the prem? "Not good enough"? IT JUST PROVED IT WORKED YOU CRETIN. The only stupid part was putting it on the big screen then acting surprised when people shouted.
Benji Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 WTF are Pearce and Keown going on about? The replay just showed the two points at which the ball may have crossed the line are cleared them both up. Jeez people know how to make controversy out of nothing.
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 Jonathan Pearce is being a cock. It just showed the first instance there may have been debate over, said no goal, then showed the next bit and gave a goal. Is he on something? it was obvious the second replay was the relevant one we were all after
MooseBreath Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 I am getting so mad at Jonathan Pearce atm he is genuinely beginning to ruin my evening. I was so mad I picked up a snotty tissue and launched it at the screen
Unabomber Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 I was so mad I picked up a snotty tissue and launched it at the screen I was so mad I vented my anger in a short comment on foxestalk and it takes a lot to get me that angry.
foxfanazer Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 I'm baffled at how complicated they've made that out to be!
Fox in the North Posted 15 June 2014 Posted 15 June 2014 was that an own goal or are we giving it to karim Own goal I'd say. It wasn't going in until it hit the goalie.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.