Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
MC Prussian

FIFA 15

By MC Prussian, in Music and Gaming

Recommended Posts

Andy King Power

Andy King Power

Posted
Posted

Zoom is very quick to be fair. Obviously we haven't seem him much due to injury.. footage what I've seen suggest he's quick and going on Tranmere editor info too.

Ulloa at 78 finishes is almost the same as Welbeck. Upgrades could possibly be made but no need for improvement yet.

Look into individual stats and compare to rest of Premier League.

 

Fair enough about him, although I do wonder how he got to 86 in the first place? That one I can't say too much about due to not seeing enough of him (and unlikely with his new injury).

 

Again, fair enough, but ever since coming to Brighton, and from what I had seen he's at least a 75 in comparison to others (Didn't know Welback was that low, I'm comparing to the bigger Championship players as well as QPR, Burnley and Stoke.)

 

I'd really like to, but is there a way for me to get a good comparison for individual stats? Because I can say that the positioning has been really excellent, we've kept our composure really well, and I would say that the stamina has been up there (We've got a very fit team.) If I can see those individual stats and compare, it would really help. It's not the fact that we're lacking gold players, just more the fact that those around us seem higher. Just something to reflect we're a Top 20 English team, one that dominated the Championship and has so far given headaches to others. Something noticeable from last year. If I can see the stats, I can make further suggestions. If I am missing something, go right ahead and point it out. (I will admit my last FIFA was 13, and there seems to be very little difference in stats.)

 

Do you know what Leicester's Team Chemistry is? Surely that has to be quite high.

Zapp

Zapp

Posted
Posted

I think most people agree that our stats are pretty fair, but annoyed at how overrated others are.

It seems it takes years to build up a good rating, but once it's high it never drops

BigWesMorgan

BigWesMorgan

Posted
Posted

Cambiasso - 78

Simpson - 73

Ulloa - 72

Upson - 72

Nugent - 71

Albrighton - 71

Wasilewski - 71

Morgan - 71

Knockaert - 70

Drinkwater - 70

Vardy - 69

Wood - 69

Mahrez - 69

De Laet - 69

Moore - 69

King - 68

Konchesky 68

James - 68

Hammond - 67

Taylor-Fletcher - 67

Schlupp - 63

 

Schmeichel Not announced yet but would imagine a 74-76

 

Morgan, Moore, Ulloa, Drinkwater, James all wrong

 

lgfualol

lgfualol

Posted
Posted

Wow. So many players under 70.

Thought Mahrez would be 70 at least.

Ridiculous.

Schlupp's rating as well. 4 points lower than GTF. This is all so wrong.

RedSoxUK

RedSoxUK

Posted
Posted

Schlupp is a 63 yet is probably the most versatile player in the Prem - Bonkers!

Thought Simpson would be lower, and Wasyl. King / Mahrez need to be higher.

Carl the Llama

Carl the Llama

Posted
Posted

Wow that's bad.  I know Ash says the overalls don't matter, but that borders on insulting. Surely you can point at our recent performances and get them to sort it our, Ash?  Here, I'll even throw in some suggestions:

 

Cambiasso - 80

Simpson - 73 (I think this is probably too high, but until we really see him play I'll leave it alone)

Ulloa - 75

Upson - 70

Nugent - 71

Albrighton - 71

Wasilewski - 71

Morgan - 75/76

Knockaert - 70

Drinkwater - 73/74

Vardy - 72

Wood - 69

Mahrez - 72/73

De Laet - 71

Moore - 72/73

King - 71

Konchesky 70

James - 72

Hammond - 70

Taylor-Fletcher - 67

Schlupp - 69/70

ScouseFox

ScouseFox

Posted
Posted

I think most people agree that our stats are pretty fair, but annoyed at how overrated others are.

It seems it takes years to build up a good rating, but once it's high it never drops

unless you're cambiasso an move to leicester

Kitchandro

Kitchandro

Posted
Posted

I'm sure we had similar ratings when we were proper shite on FIFA 08 or something.

 

Our higher rated players are just the  older ones, bizarre.

 

How can Drinkwater be rated below Wasyl, Nugent and Albrighton?

 

Wood better than James lol

dmayne7

dmayne7

Posted
Posted

I think most people agree that our stats are pretty fair, but annoyed at how overrated others are.

It seems it takes years to build up a good rating, but once it's high it never drops

 

 

Zapp's got it on the head. Our stats look fair, but seeing the others makes me think twice.

Also agree with that point. That's why someone like Ferndinand is still so high.

 

I personally think they're wide of the mark but I'd generally increase the ratings of every player. The old FIFA's were better for giving more players 90+. The fact on 14, that the highest rated keeper in the game was an 86 was a joke. Why give the scope for an extra 13 points if you're not going to use. Plus, defenders/keepers seem to get much lower ratings which is wrong.

 

Something to point out, is that if other players ratings seem too high then surely its not fair. After all, how players tend to be judged on FIFA, is in comparison to other players. If Messi and Ronaldo were 50 rated then it wouldn't be a fair rating for us to have guys in the 70's. The fact that our players' overalls (and individual) stats are poor in comparison to many teams in the division below us, is not fair in my opinion. Guys like Mahrez and Knocky have worse dribbling than several defenders on the game?! 

 

Still, as Ashley said, when the game comes out and we can see everybody's stats, I will do a comprehensive list of stats that I think should be changed.

 

Also, Ashley, I've asked this lots of times but I don't think you've ever answered it; I'm guessing you do the potential ratings as well, as that only really applies to career mode. I know you say overalls don't matter but any idea and what they might be? Should be lots of 78-83 ratings I'd say.

BigWesMorgan

BigWesMorgan

Posted
Posted

I'm sure we had similar ratings when we were proper shite on FIFA 08 or something.

 

Our higher rated players are just the  older ones, bizarre.

 

How can Drinkwater be rated below Wasyl, Nugent and Albrighton?

 

Wood better than James lol

 

Because EA don't have a F***** clue!

 

Honestly Schmeichel should be rated high 70's.

lgfualol

lgfualol

Posted
Posted

70 Rated

Same rating as the best midfielder of last season still. Fifa are thick.

Who is going to use Schlupp now? 63 is criminal. You're going to be picking players out of the youth team in career with higher ratings than that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...