Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
StanSP

West Ham - 20/12/14 - Match Thread

Recommended Posts

Guest Col city fan
Posted

You said we'll lose 2-0 about 20 minutes ago.

Make your mind up.

It's 'hope'......

Posted

Remember last season when we were sneering at the hopeless teams like Barnsley? Well what's how the rest of the Premier League views us. Clueless, Out of our depth, no hope, no chance.

Posted

It as been said on here that robinsons job was to get the deal done with players identified by pearson and walsh, so did they only identify cresswell then are there no other left backs available that are better than konchesky

:clap:

They probably identified 4 or 5 left backs, Robinson approached their clubs and either felt that the club shouldn't or couldn't afford them, the players wanted too much in wages, the players weren't interested or the 5thand 6th choices aren't really an improvement.

So it's not always Pearson's fault.

Posted

Did anyone else hear the West Ham commentator in the background of Radio Leicester talking really fast and getting excited ie. something was happening on the pitch, and all Ian Stringer was talking about was the score in the Tigers game? And then you hear the crowd go "oooh" and Stringer says "Andy Carroll tries an overhead kick, wide" - I'm sure there must have been more than just that?

 

I don't care about the Tigers, Ian.

 

Well I care about Tigers. They're Leicester too. And they're against Saints. ****ing Saints. Course I want to know about Tigers today.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

I'd love Pearson to succeed but a couple more losses could seal his fate.

Let's have it right. The owners have been very patient already.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Thought you'd be happy about that Col? :ph34r:;):P

lol

No im not, was gonna have a tenner on them winning at 2-1 down...

Posted

so at what point is the manger responsible he pick the team, makes the signings, decides the tatics and makes the subs

Pearson has made mistakes this season but most of our problems have stemmed from the players not being good enough. Robinson getting sacked suggests the players Pearson wanted to sign would keep us up but Robinson didn't get them in.
Posted

Let's have it right. The owners have been very patient already.

True Col but surely the patience will be running out very quickly if we're playing absolutely shit football and losing week in, week out?

Fingers and toes crossed that we turn this around.

Posted

West Ham are in the top 4 a reason, we've won their just once since 1980.... Even ignoring our form, a draw would be an amazing result

 

And we would be actually be drawing barring a Konchesky special

 

What people are expecting, and then being moaning cvnts when we don't hit those expectations is baffling

 

No, I know the signs don't look good since the goal and none of the above is a reason to happy clap, but you get a choice in your attitude so why choose a moaning, miserable one when it's still all to play for

Posted

QPR are a disgrace. Playing their top scorer (I mean how stupid) and having experienced players (who does that?)

Our most experienced player assisted their goal
Posted

so at what point is the manger responsible he pick the team, makes the signings, decides the tatics and makes the subs

We don't know what Pearson said to Terry Robinson etc about what players he wanted. He could have said, here's 10 quality players get them. In some ways passing the buck. If only two players on that list were signed, what can Pearson do?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...