Nick Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 You weren't one of them then? Where did I say I could name those who started the fight, or took part in it? I did infer that the pro Pearson brigade on this site, had gone into hiding, and that we know who THEY are. The inference being, that they don't want to condemn the trouble makers, because they hold the same views on Pearson as themselves.. If you cannot comprehend simple English, then may I suggest you learn some, before you continue to show your ignorance, of your own language. FT Pro Pearson brigade go underground to avoid imaginary wrath. But be careful - DT knows where YOU are. Piss off back to the 70's you knuckle dragging oaf. Calling people 'scum' for standing up for something they believe in is shameful and embarrassing.
Voll Blau Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 If you cannot comprehend simple English, then may I suggest you learn some, before you continue to show your ignorance, of your own language. Reading each clause of that sentence in the style of James Alexander Gordon makes it way more fun.
shade Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 is dangerous tiger a non-native english speaker or yoda?
Guest Bilo Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 You weren't one of them then? Where did I say I could name those who started the fight, or took part in it? I did infer that the pro Pearson brigade on this site, had gone into hiding, and that we know who THEY are. The inference being, that they don't want to condemn the trouble makers, because they hold the same views on Pearson as themselves.. If you cannot comprehend simple English, then may I suggest you learn some, before you continue to show your ignorance, of your own language.
Snooty Fox Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 The Pro Pearson lot on this site. Lefties, internet losers, UFS, blue mongies, screenlickers, Fosse Boys, call them what you will, at the end of the day plenty of accounts on this thread by regular posters as well as myself from people who were actually there that it is this Pro Pearson crowd that were giving it big to other anti Pearson fans and dishing out the threats. When they realised the anti Pearson lot were older, harder and fought a lot more battles for Leicester City than these morons will in their lifetime they backed away. Leaving others who had not kicked things off (and are all Pearson Outers) to have a little dust up. Those involved in the fighting are good lads. Those that started it off then hid away are the Pro Pearson UFS lot.
Guest Bilo Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 Reading each clause of that sentence in the style of James Alexander Gordon makes it way more fun. See, I prefer this style.
Strokes Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 The Pro Pearson lot on this site. Lefties, internet losers, UFS, blue mongies, screenlickers, Fosse Boys, call them what you will, at the end of the day plenty of accounts on this thread by regular posters as well as myself from people who were actually there that it is this Pro Pearson crowd that were giving it big to other anti Pearson fans and dishing out the threats. When they realised the anti Pearson lot were older, harder and fought a lot more battles for Leicester City than these morons will in their lifetime they backed away. Leaving others who had not kicked things off (and are all Pearson Outers) to have a little dust up. Those involved in the fighting are good lads. Those that started it off then hid away are the Pro Pearson UFS lot. I don't really see what side of the Pearson argument has to do with it, if you start a fight with a fellow city fan your a cùnt regardless.
Snooty Fox Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 I don't really see what side of the Pearson argument has to do with it, if you start a fight with a fellow city fan your a cùnt regardless. But an accurate account of what happened wouldn't go amiss? And dangerous tiger has a point, some of the lefties who started it regularly post on here yet have kept quiet on a thread of 400+ posts.
Strokes Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 But an accurate account of what happened wouldn't go amiss? And dangerous tiger has a point, some of the lefties who started it regularly post on here yet have kept quiet on a thread of 400+ posts.Well name some names then, don't beat about the bush.
inckley fox Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 What's any of this got to do with 'lefties'? You've lost me somewhere! I know a couple of incredibly left wing chaps who hate his guts, and at least one dye-in-the-wool Thatcherite who'd love to spend a week canal-boating with him through the Broads.
UpTheLeagueFox Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 The happy clappys and the negative numbskulls are as bad as each other. Fighting? Grow the fook up all of you.
AoWW Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 What's any of this got to do with 'lefties'? You've lost me somewhere! I know a couple of incredibly left wing chaps who hate his guts, and at least one dye-in-the-wool Thatcherite who'd love to spend a week canal-boating with him through the Broads. Don't you have canal boats on canals, not the Broads?
Guest Bilo Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 The happy clappys and the negative numbskulls are as bad as each other. Fighting? Grow the fook up all of you. I honestly can't fathom a mindset where you'd come to blows over opinions regarding the manager.
C-man Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 The idea of being a 'lefty' and the accusation thereof comes from those who haven't really got a leg to stand on with their own controversial (some would say moronic) opinions. And that has NOTHING to do with NP. An embarrassing political pidgeonholing for people like SF and DT to hide behind.
Corky Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 You weren't one of them then? Where did I say I could name those who started the fight, or took part in it? I did infer that the pro Pearson brigade on this site, had gone into hiding, and that we know who THEY are. The inference being, that they don't want to condemn the trouble makers, because they hold the same views on Pearson as themselves.. If you cannot comprehend simple English, then may I suggest you learn some, before you continue to show your ignorance, of your own language. Ok, boss, I, will, try.
Hirsty The Blue 94 Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 The Pro Pearson lot on this site. Lefties, internet losers, UFS, blue mongies, screenlickers, Fosse Boys, call them what you will, at the end of the day plenty of accounts on this thread by regular posters as well as myself from people who were actually there that it is this Pro Pearson crowd that were giving it big to other anti Pearson fans and dishing out the threats. When they realised the anti Pearson lot were older, harder and fought a lot more battles for Leicester City than these morons will in their lifetime they backed away. Leaving others who had not kicked things off (and are all Pearson Outers) to have a little dust up. Those involved in the fighting are good lads. Those that started it off then hid away are the Pro Pearson UFS lot. Such good lads that they were well up for a fight with their own fans. As an older bloke you should be mature enough not to, unless you are going there looking for a fight. 'Fought more battles for lcfc . Have they done a shift at left back for us then? What you mean to say is they were the sort who were involved in football hooliganism back in the day and can't accept that football has moved on from that now and were well up for a rumble? I suppose my opinion is irrelevant to you though as I'm under 40 and am not sucking from the tit of Thatcher. The fact you are a glorifying a divide between 2 'factions' of our fan base if you can call it that is embarrassing. I really can't get my head around why football has such a bearing on someones life that they are willing to fight about who the manager is, and people like yourself are justifying it. People can express their opinion however they like (within reason of course) but this is just ridiculous.
Strokes Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 I'm in no way a leftie (I'm pretty sure a few in general chat can vouch for that), and I'm fully behind pearson.
inckley fox Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 Don't you have canal boats on canals, not the Broads? There is a canal on the broads, between the rivers, in Aylsham. It's quite lovely, you know.
inckley fox Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 The idea of being a 'lefty' and the accusation thereof comes from those who haven't really got a leg to stand on with their own controversial (some would say moronic) opinions. And that has NOTHING to do with NP. An embarrassing political pidgeonholing for people like SF and DT to hide behind. I have to say it's usually the end of an intelligent conversation when somebody starts using terms like 'lefty'. But to apply it to people who like Pearson, exclusively, is a bit strange. There must be a reason which I've missed. I admit there are some similarities with those sorts of conversations where one person is a 'Lefty' and the other a 'Tory Bastard'. Namely, that both sides seem totally unwilling to shift or see a grain of reason in what the other side are saying, and it might just be better for both parties to sit at opposite ends of the pub.
Snooty Fox Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 Such good lads that they were well up for a fight with their own fans. As an older bloke you should be mature enough not to, unless you are going there looking for a fight. 'Fought more battles for lcfc . Have they done a shift at left back for us then? What you mean to say is they were the sort who were involved in football hooliganism back in the day and can't accept that football has moved on from that now and were well up for a rumble? I suppose my opinion is irrelevant to you though as I'm under 40 and am not sucking from the tit of Thatcher. The fact you are a glorifying a divide between 2 'factions' of our fan base if you can call it that is embarrassing. I really can't get my head around why football has such a bearing on someones life that they are willing to fight about who the manager is, and people like yourself are justifying it. People can express their opinion however they like (within reason of course) but this is just ridiculous. So if that's how you feel, why aren't you giving the instigators (UFS) an earful? The 40+ old boys are the innocent victims here. Of course they're going to stand their ground but they don't go looking for a row over something as menial as who the manager is.
Guest MattP Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 I'm in no way a leftie (I'm pretty sure a few in general chat can vouch for that), and I'm fully behind pearson. Pretty sure I fall into that camp as well!
inckley fox Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 I'm amazed anyone feels the need to start a fight, fight, or argue about a fight. We managed to get through Hamilton Out, Pleat Out, Taylor Out, Levein Out, Megson Out, Holloway Out, Sousa Out and Sven Out, even O'Neill and Adams Out, without beating the living hell out of each other. Even though lots of us disagreed. The closest we've come to a consensus is that one set of people should chant Pearson Out and the other should chant Pearson In, then smash the crap out of one another afterwards. I'm still amazed that my solution of all of us singing Pearson In songs when we're doing well, and perhaps something else when it's likely to cause a brawl, has been so roundly ridiculed.
Hirsty The Blue 94 Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 So if that's how you feel, why aren't you giving the instigators (UFS) an earful? The 40+ old boys are the innocent victims here. Of course they're going to stand their ground but they don't go looking for a row over something as menial as who the manager is. I don't agree with any sort of 'division' between our fans. Anyone who can't differentiate the unimportance of football in comparison to problems around the world need their heads checking whoever they may be. Pearson is the manager of a football club that we all support (regardless of his record), and the fact that people want to fight about it is a damning reflection of these people and role that football has in their lives. The fact that you seem to be glorying this divide between the L1 'ard skinheads' and the UFS 'lefties' is why I picked up on your particular post.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.