Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Ashley

Fighting between ourselves

Recommended Posts

I am a regular poster on Bentleys, and before that on Fox Fanzine Rivals site since 1999/2000.

 

I have always thought my particular style of prose and brand of journalese to be unique. You have no idea how hurtful it is to be confused with another poster - and on an LCFC forum too! This Blue Moon had better be good!!

 

BLUE ARMY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a regular poster on Bentleys, and before that on Fox Fanzine Rivals site since 1999/2000.

I have always thought my particular style of prose and brand of journalese to be unique. You have no idea how hurtful it is to be confused with another poster - and on an LCFC forum too! This Blue Moon had better be good!!

BLUE ARMY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mate we were just mucking about really.He's certainly a character that's all I'm gonna say.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh that's OK then. I'll cancel the appointment I have just made at a Swiss clinic.

 

 

I'm not saying it is him,but this wreaks of a blue moon post in another name.

 

Btw, one wreaks havoc, whereas Bernie merely reeks. I think you have your 'wreaks' and 'reeks' mixed up.

 

BLUE ARMY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I am Columbo after all. :thumbup:

 

Sadly not young man, you're way wide.

 

Btw, re-evaluate is hyphenated. Reappraisal would have been better. Bet you didn't receive this quality of education from Blue Moon.

 

Oh! One more thing before I go - if you're keeping that mac, save it for fancy dress parties.

 

BLUE ARMY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So finally people are starting to acknowledge the story I have put on here TWICE now about it being the younger 'person in' lot getting personal and aggressive that started it by giving threats and now it seems actually offering people out, outside.  They must know who they are, and they must know this thread is going on and read it, someone would have told them.  Any response?

 

They shout their mouth off then offer the handshake - weird

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have registered here specially in order to post this.

 

I am the passer by # 1 to whom Fleckney Mike referred. I was not aware that we were acquainted but he obviously recognises me. Mike is pretty well bang on in his witness account, but there are a couple of assumptions which need to be dispelled.

 

Upon exit I was implored by the young daughter of the ‘face’ mentioned by snootyfox, to deflect his attention toward her. As I arrived at his side, he was embroiled in argument with a group of youngsters. What has not been reported here however is that it was the younger ones who had begun hostilities by taking exception to his anti-Pearson stance, laying into him verbally and questioning his loyalty to a team which he has followed religiously, including throughout the dark days when faint hearts weren’t on the menu and when travelling away it was necessary to be able to look after oneself. Also, again known only to a select few in the immediate vicinity, the most vociferous of this band of brothers was repeatedly gesturing and saying ‘outside then’ to said ‘face’. I leant over to tell him in the firmest way that he was out of order, out of his league and to make his way out which is when the pushing and shoving started.

 

Seeing this development, passer-by #2 - ‘old, fat & bald’ as he has rudely been tagged (actually he is a licensed doorman) thought I was under attack and there being a complete dearth of stewards or OB, moved to my aid. Instead of this proving a calming influence, it precipitated a rush down the stairs by about half a dozen others to join in, with the inevitable consequences that such action brings. There had not been, nor would have been any exchange of pugilism without that downward charge.

 

At this, match security and OB finally turned up and as I began to make my way to the exit, none other than the aforementioned youngster offered me a handshake saying ‘We’re all Leicester together, aren’t we?’ I took up his offer but told him in no uncertain terms that he must hold himself responsible for the melee. I learned later that he made exactly the same gesture with exactly the same statement when the ‘face’ caught up with him on the concourse.

 

So, it appears that snooty fox’s observation of the behaviour of some of our fans, ridiculed elsewhere in this thread, is not too wide of the mark.

 

Young innocents being bullied by old ‘uns? I think not. More a case of the Pearson love-in crew attempting to deny others the freedom of speech they demand for themselves.

 

BLUE ARMY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pearson lovers showing their true sick colours. Just young yobbos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have registered here specially in order to post this.

 

I am the passer by # 1 to whom Fleckney Mike referred. I was not aware that we were acquainted but he obviously recognises me. Mike is pretty well bang on in his witness account, but there are a couple of assumptions which need to be dispelled.

 

Upon exit I was implored by the young daughter of the ‘face’ mentioned by snootyfox, to deflect his attention toward her. As I arrived at his side, he was embroiled in argument with a group of youngsters. What has not been reported here however is that it was the younger ones who had begun hostilities by taking exception to his anti-Pearson stance, laying into him verbally and questioning his loyalty to a team which he has followed religiously, including throughout the dark days when faint hearts weren’t on the menu and when travelling away it was necessary to be able to look after oneself. Also, again known only to a select few in the immediate vicinity, the most vociferous of this band of brothers was repeatedly gesturing and saying ‘outside then’ to said ‘face’. I leant over to tell him in the firmest way that he was out of order, out of his league and to make his way out which is when the pushing and shoving started.

 

Seeing this development, passer-by #2 - ‘old, fat & bald’ as he has rudely been tagged (actually he is a licensed doorman) thought I was under attack and there being a complete dearth of stewards or OB, moved to my aid. Instead of this proving a calming influence, it precipitated a rush down the stairs by about half a dozen others to join in, with the inevitable consequences that such action brings. There had not been, nor would have been any exchange of pugilism without that downward charge.

 

At this, match security and OB finally turned up and as I began to make my way to the exit, none other than the aforementioned youngster offered me a handshake saying ‘We’re all Leicester together, aren’t we?’ I took up his offer but told him in no uncertain terms that he must hold himself responsible for the melee. I learned later that he made exactly the same gesture with exactly the same statement when the ‘face’ caught up with him on the concourse.

 

So, it appears that snooty fox’s observation of the behaviour of some of our fans, ridiculed elsewhere in this thread, is not too wide of the mark.

 

Young innocents being bullied by old ‘uns? I think not. More a case of the Pearson love-in crew attempting to deny others the freedom of speech they demand for themselves.

 

BLUE ARMY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good evening Bruin. Pure serendipity. You are correct that we have never been acquainted and I was unaware it was you, apologies if my florid prose made it appear that we were (or more nefariously that I had stalked you unaware in an attempt to curry favour in the electronic ether in which we find ourselves). As you said you were merely passing and sought to calm down the situation, alas your attempts to bring a degree of order to proceedings was met with a wall of indifference, because of either youthful excess or the fug of alcohol by those involved. You sir are entirely blameless in proceedings.

P.S. Peace and Love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a victory for the truth! I have really enjoyed reading the UFS FoxesTalk lefties get their comeuppance today.

Early doors yesterday I posted an accurate account that the FoxesTalk lot were the instigators (I even named one of them who was shouting his mouth off on the day) and that their primary target was an older respected lad. No matter how accurate my account all I get in response are accusations that I don't even go to the games, I'm a 'wummer' etc etc. The UFS will go to any lengths to discredit my true account and try to disassociate themselves from the aggravators. Bruin has posted an accurate account, immediately the accusations come out that it's me but this time he has been verified. Unlucky UFS.

Bruin - to explain, I do have 2 accounts on here but only because FoxesTalk banned my first one. I am the Blue Moon and Snooty Fox and have never posted under any other names despite what the UFS lot say. Pretty sure an admin could clear it up by checking IP addresses if they really care so much about it. Having re-read your account I think I've worked out who you are, a 'known face' in your own right may I add.

UFS - Stay classy lads. Kicking off and giving it the big one to anyone in the Pearson Out camp until it gets a bit tasty and you're on your skates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a victory for the truth! I have really enjoyed reading the UFS FoxesTalk lefties get their comeuppance today.

Early doors yesterday I posted an accurate account that the FoxesTalk lot were the instigators (I even named one of them who was shouting his mouth off on the day) and that their primary target was an older respected lad. No matter how accurate my account all I get in response are accusations that I don't even go to the games, I'm a 'wummer' etc etc. The UFS will go to any lengths to discredit my true account and try to disassociate themselves from the aggravators. Bruin has posted an accurate account, immediately the accusations come out that it's me but this time he has been verified. Unlucky UFS.

 

 

They probably don't actually give a fvck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...