Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
davieG

Premier League 2015/16 Stuff it in here.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Fair suggestion if you set a quota of the bench spaces that have to go to academy players; should at least help stop the stock piling and leaving to rot that some big clubs get up to

Posted

There's too much pressure, too much to lose, nowadays and managers won't risk young players. There's not point in upping the subs from 7 to 10 (or whatever) just to put a few young players on the bench who won't even get on the pitch.

Posted

What are you supposed to do? on the one hand its offer big contracts on silly money to make their value go up so you have an asset to sell, on the other hand its dont let their contract run into the last year, then its arsehole players who abuse their contracts by wanting to leave early even though they were perfectly happy 6 months ago, then theres players like Adebayor who are criticised for seeing the rest of the contract out and not wanting to be sold.

Everything is a paradox and contracts in football are just a joke.

I would have mandatory release clauses in every contract based on length and salary. As a simple equation weeks left on contract x basic weekly wage = buy out clause.

If you value a player at your club as worth 50,000 a week and you have agreed to pay that for 2 years then losing him will mean you have lost an asset worth 5.2 million to you so should be compensated for that amount. It means you have to keep players contracts up to date, and to keep them offer them higher wages and players will have to accept if you agree to a higher wage then it will put teams off buying you.

You may need to tweak the formula a little bit add an age factor in there or only apply to players over 23.

Something like that would help regulate the transfer fees whilst keeping the balance of power more even.

Posted

I would have mandatory release clauses in every contract based on length and salary. As a simple equation weeks left on contract x basic weekly wage = buy out clause.

If you value a player at your club as worth 50,000 a week and you have agreed to pay that for 2 years then losing him will mean you have lost an asset worth 5.2 million to you so should be compensated for that amount. It means you have to keep players contracts up to date, and to keep them offer them higher wages and players will have to accept if you agree to a higher wage then it will put teams off buying you.

You may need to tweak the formula a little bit add an age factor in there or only apply to players over 23.

Something like that would help regulate the transfer fees whilst keeping the balance of power more even.

 

You are equating worth with cost. That's not true.

Posted

what/who turned ivanovic from probably the best defender in the league to comfortably the worst player in the league in three months?

Posted

Lots of time left for chelshit to comeback but my oh my chelsea are terrible right now. Theyve already lost 2. Heck they lost 3 over all of last season haha

Posted

what/who turned ivanovic from probably the best defender in the league to comfortably the worst player in the league in three months?

terry????

Guest Papasmurf
Posted

what/who turned ivanovic from probably the best defender in the league to comfortably the worst player in the league in three months?

Me putting him in my fantasy football team.

Posted

Nice goal by matic

 

Not closed down at all by Barkley.

Posted

When was the last time an indirect free kick was given in the PL? It is outrageous that some of these back passes aren't given.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...