Gerard Posted 11 January 2016 Posted 11 January 2016 Peeps remember we also have Jeffrey to come back in. I can't see us signing another winger If he would be one of our best players then of course we should be looking to sign him especially if there is no transfer fee or a nominal one. Anyone who falls far enough down the pecking order because of it can be sold.
Clever Fox Posted 11 January 2016 Posted 11 January 2016 Peeps remember we also have Jeffrey to come back in. I can't see us signing another winger I like Schlupp, his all round game has improved greatly. For me though his touch needs to improve a lot and his ball kicking is still not up to scratch. Remember we are talking about moving to the next level, and in that goal there are going to be players who slip down the pecking order. I think Carrillo could offer us a lot. But id he's off to Bournmouth then maybe we've switched targets to Malik who would be a great capture..
FantasticMrFuchs Posted 11 January 2016 Posted 11 January 2016 The future of André Carrillo still uncertainty. And this is confirmed by the information coming from Portugal in which the Peruvian state that rejects the offer of Bournemouth not leave money to Sporting Lisbon . "Carrillo rejects Bournemouth for not giving money to Sporting," reports "Noticiaaominuto" on its website. The guide means is a publication of the newspaper "O'Jogo". That would be the current situation of André Carrillo , who has not played since September last year in the 'Lions'. André Carrillo ends contract with Sporting Lisbon in the middle of this year and, according to published information, wait until that date to sign in free status for another club. In addition to the English club, Sevilla, Valencia and Leicester City have expressed interest. Former Alianza Lima, despite the efforts of the leadership of Sporting Lisbon and agent Pini Zahavi, who has a percentage of his passes, would have refused. No solution in sight of his subject, André Carrillo would stay six months without playing. http://depor.pe/futbol-internacional/andre-carrillo-rechaza-al-bournemouth-no-dar-dinero-sporting-lisboa-1062612
Clever Fox Posted 11 January 2016 Posted 11 January 2016 I The future of André Carrillo still uncertainty. And this is confirmed by the information coming from Portugal in which the Peruvian state that rejects the offer of Bournemouth not leave money to Sporting Lisbon . "Carrillo rejects Bournemouth for not giving money to Sporting," reports "Noticiaaominuto" on its website. The guide means is a publication of the newspaper "O'Jogo". That would be the current situation of André Carrillo , who has not played since September last year in the 'Lions'. André Carrillo ends contract with Sporting Lisbon in the middle of this year and, according to published information, wait until that date to sign in free status for another club. In addition to the English club, Sevilla, Valencia and Leicester City have expressed interest. Former Alianza Lima, despite the efforts of the leadership of Sporting Lisbon and agent Pini Zahavi, who has a percentage of his passes, would have refused. No solution in sight of his subject, André Carrillo would stay six months without playing. http://depor.pe/futbol-internacional/andre-carrillo-rechaza-al-bournemouth-no-dar-dinero-sporting-lisboa-1062612 t seems like he's a very single minded and principled individual.
Fox 4 Life Posted 11 January 2016 Posted 11 January 2016 Am I missing something, he won't go to Bournemouth because they won't pay sporting yet he is willing to sit out the rest of the season and go on a free?! Or is he saying he doesn't want sporting to get any money? Seems harsh
Jaspa Posted 11 January 2016 Posted 11 January 2016 Bournemouth can get as strong as they like, weve already played them twice in the League so they can only effect our competitors. Theyre throwing surprising amounts of money around but noone is poor in this League, Sunderland and Newcastle spent around 50mil each in the summer and look where they are. The last team to come up poor were Burnley and they still had money stashed they just didnt want to buy big and ended up with George Boyd as their main man, before that it was Blackpool you have to consider them an exception.
1972 Fox Posted 12 January 2016 Posted 12 January 2016 Bournemouth can get as strong as they like, weve already played them twice in the League so they can only effect our competitors. Theyre throwing surprising amounts of money around but noone is poor in this League, Sunderland and Newcastle spent around z50mil each in the summer and look where they are. The last team to come up poor were Burnley and they still had money stashed they just didnt want to buy big and ended up with George Boyd as their main man, before that it was Blackpool you have to consider them an exception. I beg to differ that Sunderland and Newcastle both spent £50m in the summer.
Jaspa Posted 12 January 2016 Posted 12 January 2016 I beg to differ that Sunderland and Newcastle both spent £50m in the summer. I heard it said somewhere and've regurgitated it Newcastle - £53m ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015%E2%80%9316_Newcastle_United_F.C._season#In ) Soonderloond - £26m ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015%E2%80%9316_Sunderland_A.F.C._season#Transfers_In ) Those Sundlund numbers dont take into account M'vila, Yedlin and Toivonen loan deals. Still a way off admittedly and I'm now hating the cnut who spouted that in the first place (probably TrueGeordie). Everyone has money in this League and its not worth claiming a clubs poor or that a team benefits from spending huge amounts of money on players. I havent heard 'plucky little moneystrapped Bournemouth' played since the start of the season, the main reason they get sympathised for is their injury list. As I've read off others on here theres no hiding from the fact they have money now, they will be tested and we'll see if the couple of dozen million chucked into them actually improves them.
sphericalfox Posted 12 January 2016 Posted 12 January 2016 Brazilian is like a trimmed back version of Portuguese.Portuguese is a bit bushier.
1972 Fox Posted 12 January 2016 Posted 12 January 2016 I heard it said somewhere and've regurgitated it Newcastle - £53m ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015%E2%80%9316_Newcastle_United_F.C._season#In ) Soonderloond - £26m ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015%E2%80%9316_Sunderland_A.F.C._season#Transfers_In ) Those Sundlund numbers dont take into account M'vila, Yedlin and Toivonen loan deals. Still a way off admittedly and I'm now hating the cnut who spouted that in the first place (probably TrueGeordie). Everyone has money in this League and its not worth claiming a clubs poor or that a team benefits from spending huge amounts of money on players. I havent heard 'plucky little moneystrapped Bournemouth' played since the start of the season, the main reason they get sympathised for is their injury list. As I've read off others on here theres no hiding from the fact they have money now, they will be tested and we'll see if the couple of dozen million chucked into them actually improves them. Yes I'm looking forward to the Cherries being referred to as hig spending Bournemouth!
FantasticMrFuchs Posted 13 January 2016 Posted 13 January 2016 Sporting president Bruno de Carvalho has once again come out with a load of fan pleasing nonsense bringing embarrassment upon Sporting Lisbon. The president is angry with Andre Carrillo for refusing to sign a new contract, with his current one ending in the summer. Rather than work with the player and try to find a compromise, Carrillo was last year suspended by Sporting and hasn't been allowed to play. Bruno de Carvalho has repeatedly talked about disciplinary proceedings against Carrillo, which all stem from him not accepting renewal offers last year. Sporting like to put players on contracts with huge buyout clauses, without the wages to match, and it can lead to exit thoughts, like the transfer of Eric Dier to Tottenham. Leicester City made an official bid of €12m during the summer transfer window, which led Sporting's president to mock them and Carrillo's ability because he'd only received that offer "The only proposal that I received was that of Leicester. Is Carrillo good? If he’s good it only appears there was a proposal from Leicester, this colossus of world football? Only after the clubs agree among themselves, then the buyer club can talk to the player. "The agent did not speak to the player. When I was young I also believed in Santa Claus, but then I stopped believing." It's little wonder Carrillo didn't renew! The latest comments from Bruno de Carvalho are even more pathetic, with him quoted by Estadio Deportivo as saying "If it had not been the Sporting in his life, he possibly wouldn't play football, he could be playing in any street of Peru and perhaps not even known by anyone. "We worked with him, Carrillo, four years ago, we grew him, educated him, dressed him, fed him... Because of that Carrillo now has a name, but when he arrived in 2011 he was a child." When Carrillo moved to Sporting, he was already part of the Peru national squad and had been named the best young player in the country, hence Sporting paying €1.5m for him. Hardly some kid kicking a ball around in the street. http://sportwitness.ning.com/forum/topics/boss-mocks-leicester-transfer-target-embarrasses-club
Tuna Posted 13 January 2016 Posted 13 January 2016 Lots of Twitter rumours suggesting he's off to Atletico.
dylanlegend Posted 13 January 2016 Posted 13 January 2016 Sporting president Bruno de Carvalho has once again come out with a load of fan pleasing nonsense bringing embarrassment upon Sporting Lisbon. The president is angry with Andre Carrillo for refusing to sign a new contract, with his current one ending in the summer. Rather than work with the player and try to find a compromise, Carrillo was last year suspended by Sporting and hasn't been allowed to play. Bruno de Carvalho has repeatedly talked about disciplinary proceedings against Carrillo, which all stem from him not accepting renewal offers last year. Sporting like to put players on contracts with huge buyout clauses, without the wages to match, and it can lead to exit thoughts, like the transfer of Eric Dier to Tottenham. Leicester City made an official bid of €12m during the summer transfer window, which led Sporting's president to mock them and Carrillo's ability because he'd only received that offer "The only proposal that I received was that of Leicester. Is Carrillo good? If he’s good it only appears there was a proposal from Leicester, this colossus of world football? Only after the clubs agree among themselves, then the buyer club can talk to the player. "The agent did not speak to the player. When I was young I also believed in Santa Claus, but then I stopped believing." It's little wonder Carrillo didn't renew! The latest comments from Bruno de Carvalho are even more pathetic, with him quoted by Estadio Deportivo as saying "If it had not been the Sporting in his life, he possibly wouldn't play football, he could be playing in any street of Peru and perhaps not even known by anyone. "We worked with him, Carrillo, four years ago, we grew him, educated him, dressed him, fed him... Because of that Carrillo now has a name, but when he arrived in 2011 he was a child." When Carrillo moved to Sporting, he was already part of the Peru national squad and had been named the best young player in the country, hence Sporting paying €1.5m for him. Hardly some kid kicking a ball around in the street. http://sportwitness.ning.com/forum/topics/boss-mocks-leicester-transfer-target-embarrasses-club That's Bruno de Carvalho fella seems like a thoroughly blo*dy nice bloke!
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 13 January 2016 Posted 13 January 2016 Sporting president Bruno de Carvalho has once again come out with a load of fan pleasing nonsense bringing embarrassment upon Sporting Lisbon. The president is angry with Andre Carrillo for refusing to sign a new contract, with his current one ending in the summer. Rather than work with the player and try to find a compromise, Carrillo was last year suspended by Sporting and hasn't been allowed to play. Bruno de Carvalho has repeatedly talked about disciplinary proceedings against Carrillo, which all stem from him not accepting renewal offers last year. Sporting like to put players on contracts with huge buyout clauses, without the wages to match, and it can lead to exit thoughts, like the transfer of Eric Dier to Tottenham. Leicester City made an official bid of €12m during the summer transfer window, which led Sporting's president to mock them and Carrillo's ability because he'd only received that offer "The only proposal that I received was that of Leicester. Is Carrillo good? If he’s good it only appears there was a proposal from Leicester, this colossus of world football? Only after the clubs agree among themselves, then the buyer club can talk to the player. "The agent did not speak to the player. When I was young I also believed in Santa Claus, but then I stopped believing." It's little wonder Carrillo didn't renew! The latest comments from Bruno de Carvalho are even more pathetic, with him quoted by Estadio Deportivo as saying "If it had not been the Sporting in his life, he possibly wouldn't play football, he could be playing in any street of Peru and perhaps not even known by anyone. "We worked with him, Carrillo, four years ago, we grew him, educated him, dressed him, fed him... Because of that Carrillo now has a name, but when he arrived in 2011 he was a child." When Carrillo moved to Sporting, he was already part of the Peru national squad and had been named the best young player in the country, hence Sporting paying €1.5m for him. Hardly some kid kicking a ball around in the street. http://sportwitness.ning.com/forum/topics/boss-mocks-leicester-transfer-target-embarrasses-club What a d*ck there president seems to be.
jmono84 Posted 14 January 2016 Posted 14 January 2016 Ummmm interesting, breaking news on ssn says athletico can't sign players over the next two windows... Unsure if it includes this window GET HIM IN!!
Dan Posted 14 January 2016 Posted 14 January 2016 I beg to differ that Sunderland and Newcastle both spent £50m in the summer. Sunderland maybe not but Newcastle spent loads. I think they had the highest net spend in the division (although in fairness Man Utd taking in over £40mil for Di Maria helped that).
AjcW Posted 14 January 2016 Posted 14 January 2016 Ummmm interesting, breaking news on ssn says athletico can't sign players over the next two windows... Unsure if it includes this window GET HIM IN!! Only applies after this window mate.
richardsfoxes Posted 14 January 2016 Posted 14 January 2016 Went on his el twitter page he liked a post from a Portuguese newspaper suggesting that we are going to come in for him in January, make of it as you will.
Gerard Posted 14 January 2016 Posted 14 January 2016 Went on his el twitter page he liked a post from a Portuguese newspaper suggesting that we are going to come in for him in January, make of it as you will. Got a link?
richardsfoxes Posted 14 January 2016 Posted 14 January 2016 https://twitter.com/18andrecarrillo/likes
STUHILL Posted 14 January 2016 Posted 14 January 2016 With Mahrez, Gray, Albrighton, Dyer and Schlupp to come back, I think this can wait until the summer, plus it seems like a real mess at his club. Get him on a free in the Summer if he is still available or Dyer might improve and if Swansea go down, he could be at a bargain price. Also think Gray has potential to be a fantastic player for us and can see him starting for us next season.
Simo86 Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 With Mahrez, Gray, Albrighton, Dyer and Schlupp to come back, I think this can wait until the summer, plus it seems like a real mess at his club. Get him on a free in the Summer if he is still available or Dyer might improve and if Swansea go down, he could be at a bargain price. Also think Gray has potential to be a fantastic player for us and can see him starting for us next season. We'd have to get his contract sewn up now. Pre-contract deal if we wanted him on a free in the summer, doubt he'd still be available in a couple of months time. I'd happily get him in now on the cheap and send Dyer back if it's possible, he's been doggo for a while now. He just doesn't seem to offer anything
Heymister2015 Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 Summer carillo free, Austin Free and Arias for £10m no need to go out big in the summer!
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 Summer carillo free, Austin Free and Arias for £10m no need to go out big in the summer! Replace Austin with Aboubakar & add a top class centre back then I think we're up there.
Guest TaggertvsWise Posted 15 January 2016 Posted 15 January 2016 With Mahrez, Gray, Albrighton, Dyer and Schlupp to come back, I think this can wait until the summer, plus it seems like a real mess at his club. Get him on a free in the Summer if he is still available or Dyer might improve and if Swansea go down, he could be at a bargain price. Also think Gray has potential to be a fantastic player for us and can see him starting for us next season. Dyer? Did you see him against Spurs. Absolutely awful, got caught out of position, didn't track back, can't hold on to the ball... The commentators were asking why Swansea got rid considering their predicament, well after that 90 mins I can see why. No thank you.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.