cityfanlee23 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Just now, ttfn said: But he didn't get it wrong. He didn't touch him. The ball was won about a foot in front of Diouf and then Vardy doesn't touch him. As I said, He did not get it wrong. HINDSIGHT. The ref was behind him and it LOOKED malicious, I am not defending the fact he made a bad decision, but I won't attack the ref for coming to that conclusion, I've provided evidence of the tackle and it looks dangerous at first sight. People on here have said he was being held back and "fell" into the tackle, some said he was pushed into it. thats 3 different scenarios from our fans. It looked dangerous when I saw it and I expected a yellow or a red to follow at the time.
FrankieADZ Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 1 minute ago, justfoxes said: This Tw@ must be suspended most obvious piece of cheating I have ever seen !! We joke and say the ref must be wearing a ???? Shirt under his top but this tw@ Powson fooking is a cheating CNUT !! 2-0 to Powson !! he wont be, he'll get a pat on the back from the ref's union and all that lark like usually, thats the thing there is no bottle from the FA to crack down on them and their woeful displays, but its typical of the FA and we all know how corrupt a place that it. good luck to whatever team get him next weekend,
Sublime_Coatsworth Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 14 minutes ago, The Doctor said: Wont get it rescinded. Fa don't care that there's no contact, that he won the ball or that he was arguably fouled first - it looks like a lunge and they can argue he's not in control. You're right. Plus - it's Vardy. He's no chance.
Izzy Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 1 minute ago, cityfanlee23 said: Bore off for showing my reasoning? You cannot tell me at first glance it does not look malicious. If you don't like it, block me, I will survive. O.K. You win Lee Can we drop it now until the post match thread?
cityfanlee23 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 5 minutes ago, adam said: Like I said earlier. A ridiculous tackle to make away from home. It looked alot worst before you watch the reply's. Exactly, Refs do not get a second chance, and with the way he went in I cannot blame him for not asking his assistant based on the refs positioning.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 2 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said: Situations like this could galvanise the players. The vast majority have reacted well to adversity in the past. This ref cannot ref in the prem again. His game management is atrocious. This hopefully
foxes_rule1978 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Vardy wasn't reckless, that is like a player scoring from long distance and questioning way he took the shot. He gets the ball and no studs are showing
cityfanlee23 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Just now, Izzy Muzzett said: O.K. You win Lee Can we drop it now until the post match thread? I have about 10 people attacking my position, forgive me for having to defend my opinion.
Larry_LCFC Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Ranieri is really pissing me off now. 2-0 down and most the team at risk of being sent off. Get the ****ing subs on you stubborn idiot.
ImBlue Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 8 minutes ago, pazzerfox said: Surely we need to try something different though...SURELY. We have the worst away record in the Premier league. Regardless of the fact we were the better side prior to an incorrect decision that changed the game? We we played that formation and won the league? Im not opposed to a change, but saying it today is daft
Guest Mee-9 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 He'll be reffing Rushden and Diamonds next weekend.
cityfanlee23 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 3 minutes ago, ImBlue said: Bullshit. Sorry, but the reason it looks bad at first viewing is the angle of the TV camera. Pawson is the other side and should see Vardy's movement clearly, the kick with his right leg getting the ball and the fact he almost tried to plant his foot with his left. That cant be seen on the first viewing, but that isn't Pawson' view. No excuses for that decision. You cannot even see his View, so you cannot make the decision for him. He's actually behind vardy and to the left, therefore it would be difficult to see if the studs are up, vardy made a stupid lunge when he was off balance.
orangecity23 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Martins Indi fouls, Pieters is booked. The guy is ****ing blind.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 How is he not off for that!!! Mistimed and could have broke his leg!
TheUltimateWinner Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Hahaha proof referee is blind he got the wrong bloke
Jimothy Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 1 minute ago, cityfanlee23 said: I have about 10 people attacking my position, forgive me for having to defend my opinion. You have 10 people attacking your position because you're talking crap
Barky Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 2 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said: I have about 10 people attacking my position, forgive me for having to defend my opinion. Few more than 10. Tells you something, that.
cityfanlee23 Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Just now, ImBlue said: Regardless of the fact we were the better side prior to an incorrect decision that changed the game? We we played that formation and won the league? Im not opposed to a change, but saying it today is daft We were not the "better side" by any stretch. It was 50/50 and stoke looked just as dangerous.
ImBlue Posted 17 December 2016 Posted 17 December 2016 Just now, cityfanlee23 said: You cannot even see his View, so you cannot make the decision for him. He's actually behind vardy and to the left, therefore it would be difficult to see if the studs are up, vardy made a stupid lunge when he was off balance. He should see him trying to plant his left leg. he should see the tussle and that he was off balance. right?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.