thursday_next Posted 21 February 2017 Posted 21 February 2017 19 minutes ago, Merging Cultures said: However, I do think there is a lot of merit in getting him early and helping to guide him. He is naive. He has no experience. He is very pliable. We can shape his policy if we befriend him and work with him early on. I think we'd just be happy to get a trade deal that doesn't bankrupt our exporters, even if Theresa May has to have her pussy grabbed. It would be a bonus if it doesn't happen on live TV.
Merging Cultures Posted 21 February 2017 Posted 21 February 2017 12 minutes ago, leicsmac said: Where did all those black folks with suspiciously white sounding surnames in the annals of late 19th Century history come from, after all? Maybe I am missing the sarcasm... they got their names from their owners. However, many Africans (and other races) were involved in selling their compatriots to the slave trade... so maybe that's what you were implying?!
Merging Cultures Posted 21 February 2017 Posted 21 February 2017 1 minute ago, thursday_next said: I think we'd just be happy to get a trade deal that doesn't bankrupt our exporters, even if Theresa May has to have her pussy grabbed. It would be a bonus if it doesn't happen on live TV. As I said, we look desperate!
leicsmac Posted 21 February 2017 Posted 21 February 2017 42 minutes ago, Merging Cultures said: Maybe I am missing the sarcasm... they got their names from their owners. However, many Africans (and other races) were involved in selling their compatriots to the slave trade... so maybe that's what you were implying?! Yeah, I should have been more clear with the snark there. My point was that being a slave owner and so mandated by law as being above your slaves (and believing it) didn't stop the owners from...inclinations towards them that they acted on, so why do his supporters assume Milo can't have the same attitude towards black people simply because he wants a piece of them?
Claridge Posted 21 February 2017 Posted 21 February 2017 On 20/02/2017 at 12:01, Facecloth said: No Emily Pankhurst did do something about it, there's a difference. Typical upper class wannabes,who did more harm than good.it was the work of Millicent fawcett and the suffragists that should be praised.the suffragettes were a bunch of lunatics who backed the government into a corner from which they couldn't give women the vote.pankhursts blew up Lloyd George's house and he was a supporter
Rincewind Posted 21 February 2017 Posted 21 February 2017 11 hours ago, lgfualol said: Can't stand that Milo bloke. Him, Piers Morgan and Katie Hopkins need to be fired into space. Preferably one way I know Trump is not personally responsible but it is because of his plans to make America 'great' that this will happen more frequently. Maybe he should know what it feels like. Unless anyone can give a valid reason why this British man should be barred from entering the USA.
Jon the Hat Posted 22 February 2017 Posted 22 February 2017 18 hours ago, Rincewind said: Preferably one way I know Trump is not personally responsible but it is because of his plans to make America 'great' that this will happen more frequently. Maybe he should know what it feels like. Unless anyone can give a valid reason why this British man should be barred from entering the USA. No idea. Perhaps he shares the name of someone on a no fly list? Perhaps he looks at things online in the course of his job which have put him the radar of the NSA for some reason. We don't know.
Rincewind Posted 23 February 2017 Posted 23 February 2017 21 hours ago, Jon the Hat said: No idea. Perhaps he shares the name of someone on a no fly list? Perhaps he looks at things online in the course of his job which have put him the radar of the NSA for some reason. We don't know. Good answer. Also, because he was Welsh,, maybe they suspected him of being a sheep shagger. Just lucky his name wasn't David Jones. That would have been a big give away. Passengers with the names of Sean O'Donnell and Jock McDonald were also refused entry as a precaution as they may be a member of the IRA and involved in whiskey smuggling respectively..
leicsmac Posted 23 February 2017 Posted 23 February 2017 http://cnn.it/2l1nTWq The last time states thought civil rights were something they alone should decide, they proved they weren't up to it, and things got a bit bloody. And they lost. Let's not do that again, ok?
SMX11 Posted 23 February 2017 Posted 23 February 2017 3 hours ago, leicsmac said: http://cnn.it/2l1nTWq The last time states thought civil rights were something they alone should decide, they proved they weren't up to it, and things got a bit bloody. And they lost. Let's not do that again, ok? Those states were in their rights to secede but honest Abe didn't like it. Maybe California et al should do the same.....
leicsmac Posted 23 February 2017 Posted 23 February 2017 1 hour ago, SMX11 said: Those states were in their rights to secede but honest Abe didn't like it. Maybe California et al should do the same..... I really hope it won't take another bloodbath to convince some people (again) that a different demographic of people to them aren't things and are in fact people, with all the civil rights thereof. Some states have shown time and again that they can't be trusted to pass and keep quality equal rights legislation. Why this keeps on becoming an issue a century and a half after I simply don't know.
Charl91 Posted 25 February 2017 Posted 25 February 2017 BBC (and other media groups) banned from press briefing. Because apparently "fake news". http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39088770
Jimothy Posted 25 February 2017 Posted 25 February 2017 15 minutes ago, Charl91 said: BBC (and other media groups) banned from press briefing. Because apparently "fake news". http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39088770 Should I believe that bbc report on them being banned or is that fake too?
erlee Posted 25 February 2017 Posted 25 February 2017 the deep state is deeply entrenched..& has been for the past 100 years since Jackson & Lincoln & JFK.. (JFK is what happens when you become prez. & don;'t toe the line & have independent ideas not conforming to the "narratives")
Dr The Singh Posted 25 February 2017 Posted 25 February 2017 3 hours ago, Charl91 said: BBC (and other media groups) banned from press briefing. Because apparently "fake news". http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39088770 Trump has in the past been very critical of the BBC, and I remember him saying to a BBC reporters face 'yeah, I know you lot, you guys say your independent, unbiased......We know different..'
leicsmac Posted 25 February 2017 Posted 25 February 2017 3 hours ago, Charl91 said: BBC (and other media groups) banned from press briefing. Because apparently "fake news". http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39088770 Surprised it's taken this long, really.
Nick Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 1 hour ago, erlee said: we know who the fake news are,, seriously Seriously, you are using the content of this video and the narrator as some form of evidential source for something
erlee Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 19 hours ago, Swan Lesta said: Seriously, you are using the content of this video and the narrator as some form of evidential source for something why not we need some comic relief after this stressful week with knives embedded in Ranieri's backside
ozleicester Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 Assassinated by June 30th or resigned by August 1st
Nick Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 https://qz.com/919257/department-of-homeland-security-report-rejects-donald-trumps-travel-ban-claims/ In other shock news....
Rincewind Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 So it has to be done again until they give Trump the report that matches his views? He is going to go down in history as the comic President.
Thracian Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 On 25/02/2017 at 09:58, Charl91 said: BBC (and other media groups) banned from press briefing. Because apparently "fake news". http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39088770 Can't knock it. They should be banned over here as well. They're so biased, if you rolled them, they'd turn a full circle on a bowling green.
Jimothy Posted 27 February 2017 Posted 27 February 2017 40 minutes ago, Thracian said: Can't knock it. They should be banned over here as well. They're so biased, if you rolled them, they'd turn a full circle on a bowling green. And the evidence youve served up in this thread to prove their bias was laughable too. Bring me evidence of bbc bias or gtfo.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.