fix it , give mahrez a release clause

[Foxxed]

7 hours ago, the fox said:

wrong thread

 

Are we no longer speaking about adding release clauses? I've only read a little of this thread but earlier you were speaking about making him pay us 25 million. Jesus H. Christ. He helped us achieve the impossible. He helped us become world famous. Now he wants to bugger off. And Man City's araeholery combined with his unforgivable ambition to play for probably the best team in the world have messed up some games. Let's get this into proportion. I'm annoyed and bored but I'm not *quite* willing as yet to send him to a debtors prison.

 

[Vlad the Fox]

#freemahrez

 

#releaseclause

 

 

 

[Countryfox]

Andy King didn’t have a release clause ...    what a wally.    All the best at the Swans Andy...   model professional and top bloke.

[norwichfox]

1 minute ago, Countryfox said:

Andy King didn’t have a release clause ...    what a wally.    All the best at the Swans Andy...   model professional and top bloke.

I don't think Frank Mclintock did either....but he never chose Swansea though, so perhaps Andy did the right thing and won't come back as the 2nd worst manager we ever had.....

[ktfox59]

On 05/02/2018 at 08:37, ultrafox said:

Part of me thinks he has already trashed his value with his unprofessional conduct.

 

On the other hand, I remember thinking the same about Luis Suarez, and look where he ended up.

 

Personally I think we should have took the 65m and moved on. Now only time will tell if this will end well or not!

if its been mentioned before, i apologise.but every contract a footballer signs comes wirh a mandatory release clause. Obviously this is a gamble both ways. im guessing wages are linked to the release clause amount

[ktfox59]

1 minute ago, ktfox59 said:

if its been mentioned before, i apologise.but every contract a footballer signs comes wirh a mandatory release clause. Obviously this is a gamble both ways. im guessing wages are linked to the release clause amount

meant to say in spain.?

[yorkie1999]

I always thought release clauses were significantly higher than a players value at the time of the contract signing. Kante had one for 20 odd million, but we only paid 5 million for him. Benzema and ronaldo have nearly a £900 million release clause. It would be cheaper to just buy Mahrez for 80 million and surely they powers that be are not going to give him a new contract with a low release clause just to get him to play for a few games where his head wont be in it anyway.   

[AlloverthefloorYesNdidi]

1 hour ago, yorkie1999 said:

I always thought release clauses were significantly higher than a players value at the time of the contract signing. Kante had one for 20 odd million, but we only paid 5 million for him. Benzema and ronaldo have nearly a £900 million release clause. It would be cheaper to just buy Mahrez for 80 million and surely they powers that be are not going to give him a new contract with a low release clause just to get him to play for a few games where his head wont be in it anyway.   

Its for this reason that a release clause makes no sense at all.  It would be pure capitulation on the part of the club.

[Almo-Fox]

Claud puel said we will not give any details on how the club will deal with mahrez affair . this is an inside matter and we are not open to make it public .and leave it to owners ,  all this means that the owners are working towards a solution with mshrez s representatives. 

 

informations from ITK the club is changing the contract to allow mahrez to move in the summer in a clear manner .

 

 

but one have to blame mshrez as he s not been enough honest when signing the new contract and standing string to add clearly a release clause even with a high price possible to let the club benefit fro his move as they value him very highly.

 

mahrez has not allowed Leicester city fans to experience his eventual move positively without causing havoc and mayhem. mahrez ( or any player ) has not the right to play with the fans s hearths 

and push them to chose between their love to him and the club . 

 

for sure all this drama about mahrez saga has caused breaking the routine in lcfc ( team and fans ) but God brutal change is always painful 

 

Edited 6 February 2018 by Almo-Fox

[yorkie1999]

45 minutes ago, Almo-Fox said:

Claud puel said we will not give any details on how the club will deal with mahrez affair . this is an inside matter and we are not open to make it public .and leave it to owners ,  all this means that the owners are working towards a solution with mshrez s representatives. 

 

informations from ITK the club is changing the contract to allow mahrez to move in the summer in a clear manner .

 

 

but one have to blame mshrez as he s not been enough honest when signing the new contract and standing string to add clearly a release clause even with a high price possible to let the club benefit fro his move as they value him very highly.

 

mahrez has not allowed Leicester city fans to experience his eventual move positively without causing havoc and mayhem. mahrez ( or any player ) has not the right to play with the fans s hearths 

and push them to chose between their love to him and the club . 

 

for sure all this drama about mahrez saga has caused breaking the routine in lcfc ( team and fans ) but God brutal change is always painful 

 

But his release clause will be higher than we want for him, the whole point of a release clause is to allow the player to leave but at an exaggerated fee so if another club thinks he's worth it they'll basically buy out his contract but for more than it's worth. At this moment he'd be better off not having a release clause as it will cost less to buy him.

[Almo-Fox]

24 minutes ago, yorkie1999 said:

But his release clause will be higher than we want for him, the whole point of a release clause is to allow the player to leave but at an exaggerated fee so if another club thinks he's worth it they'll basically buy out his contract but for more than it's worth. At this moment he'd be better off not having a release clause as it will cost less to buy him.

I m with you on the aim of a release clause , but in mahrez s case it s totally different. a RC will ensure a faithful relation between mahrez and the club, and putting in rest the dynamic relationship between him znd the fans ( avoiding any demage).

 

a RC as higher as it ought to be, will surely oscillating between 80 m and 110 m, this will calm mahrez and keep the club image in sport industry ( that the owners have built during the years ) and when a club will come knocking at Leicester city doors wanting mahrez ( man city will not be the sole club ) the RC will be met and mahrez and his agent may pay in shortage. 

Edited 6 February 2018 by Almo-Fox

[ZeGuy]

24 minutes ago, yorkie1999 said:

But his release clause will be higher than we want for him, the whole point of a release clause is to allow the player to leave but at an exaggerated fee so if another club thinks he's worth it they'll basically buy out his contract but for more than it's worth. At this moment he'd be better off not having a release clause as it will cost less to buy him.

Not necessarily, they're going to compromise. There is just no way the release clause, if there is one, will be set at 90M or higher. No one will win in this case.. More likely 75-80M. This way, he knows exactly for which price he goes and the club who wants to get him will have to cough this amount and no less

 

The release clause is now essential and it certainly is what they're trying to solve right now.

Edited 6 February 2018 by ZeGuy

[AlloverthefloorYesNdidi]

1 minute ago, Almo-Fox said:

I m with you on the aim of a release clause , but in mahrez s case it s totally different. a RC will ensure a faithful relation between mahrez and the club, and putting in rest the dynamic relationship between him znd the fans.

 

a RC as higher as it ought to be, will surely oscillating between 80 m and 110 m, this will calm mahrez and keep the club image in sport industry ( that the owners have built during the years ) and when a club will come at Leicester city doors wanting mahrez ( man city will not be the sole club ) the RC will be met and mahrez and his agent may pay in shortage. 

But the problem with that is there isnt any evidence that someone will come in and pay 80 million for him. A sensible release clause needs to be at 80 minimum, but that might be too high for someone to pay

 

We will probably sell him for less than that in the summer.  I dont see a release that both parties could agree a figure on

[Almo-Fox]

28 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said:

But the problem with that is there isnt any evidence that someone will come in and pay 80 million for him. A sensible release clause needs to be at 80 minimum, but that might be too high for someone to pay

 

We will probably sell him for less than that in the summer.  I dont see a release that both parties could agree a figure on

with RC mahrez will accept his fate and is already in a top club

 

but as I have been told by some friends close to Kia s mahrez adviser , that a big company is buying his commercial image ( after a thorough study has come to conclusion that mahrez has become  world sport personality ( as happened to coutinho ) and they are ready to cover a part of his deal znd even man  city will be beaten by a big European club intersted in mahrez ) 

 

Edited 6 February 2018 by Almo-Fox

[shen]

2 minutes ago, Almo-Fox said:

with RC mahrez will accept his fate and is already in a top club

 

but as I have been told by some friends close to Kia s mahrez adviser , that a big company is buying his commercial image ( after a thorough study has come to conclusion that mahrez has become  world sport personality ( as happened to coutinho ) and they are ready to cover a part of his deal znd even mzhrez city will be beaten in mahrez move ) 

 

so 80-110 m or even more ( Leicester will have the right to adjust will the market inflation ) 

What...?

[AlloverthefloorYesNdidi]

7 minutes ago, Almo-Fox said:

with RC mahrez will accept his fate and is already in a top club

 

but as I have been told by some friends close to Kia s mahrez adviser , that a big company is buying his commercial image ( after a thorough study has come to conclusion that mahrez has become  world sport personality ( as happened to coutinho ) and they are ready to cover a part of his deal znd even mzhrez city will be beaten in mahrez move ) 

 

so 80-110 m or even more ( Leicester will have the right to adjust will the market inflation ) 

I dont understand, Almo. Could you elaborate?

[Almo-Fox]

7 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said:

I dont understand, Almo. Could you elaborate?

a RC 80-110 m will not stand in mzhrez move 

 

let say man city want buy mahrez buy out clause ( part of it will be paid by a certain company as they did in coutinho move to barca ) 

 

some were saying man city will be beaten by a new club coming into mahrez move ( RM)

Edited 6 February 2018 by Almo-Fox

[the fox]

15 minutes ago, shen said:

What...?

 

9 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said:

I dont understand, Almo. Could you elaborate?

he got a word from a mate close to kia (his new adviser) that he (kia) got him a deal with a company to buy his sports image rights because riyadh now is recognizable and said company are ready to close the distence and cover the disparity between what leicester value him and what man city are ready to pay

Edited 6 February 2018 by the fox

[AlloverthefloorYesNdidi]

6 minutes ago, Almo-Fox said:

a RC 80-110 m will not stand in mzhrez move 

 

let say man city want buy mahrez buy out clause ( part of it will be paid a certain company as they did in coutinho move to barca ) 

 

some were saying man city will be beaten by a new club coming into mahrez move ( RM)

Ah ok, I see

 

I didnt know it could work like this.  Didnt hear about this with the Coutinho deal

 

I'm a little bit sceptical.  But if Mahrez happily agrees to a release clause of 80 mill +, then great.  He will play for that move and the club cant be blamed if nobody buys him.

 

Hard to see how he'd be happy with a release clause thats higher than what we didn't let him go for in the January window, but if there is anything in this image rights company stuff you're speaking about, then maybz

Edited 6 February 2018 by AlloverthefloorYesNdidi

[Mike Oxlong]

Surprised Mahrez isn’t back in training. Thought he was desperate to play at Man City.

[Guest Cujek]

4 hours ago, Countryfox said:

Andy King didn’t have a release clause ...    what a wally.    All the best at the Swans Andy...   model professional and top bloke.

Andy King is worth 10 Mahrez's as a human being.

[yorkie1999]

4 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said:

Ah ok, I see

 

I didnt know it could work like this.  Didnt hear about this with the Coutinho deal

 

I'm a little bit sceptical.  But if Mahrez happily agrese to a release clause of 80 mill +, then great.  He will play for that move and the club cant be blamed if nobody buys him.

 

Hard to see how he'd be happy with a release clause thats higher than what we didint let him go for in the January window, but if there is anything in this image rights company stuff you're speaking about, then maybz

Hang on a mo, he's saying £110 million won't stand in mzhrez move 

[yorkie1999]

6 minutes ago, the fox said:

 

he got a word from a mate close to kia (his new adviser) that he (kia) got him a deal with a company to buy his sports image rights because riyadh now is recognizable and said company are ready to close the distence and cover the disparity between what leicester value him and what man city are ready to pay

Wonder who the company is, i bet its the same one that kevin and perry use.

[Almo-Fox]

13 minutes ago, AlloverthefloorYesNdidi said:

Ah ok, I see

 

I didnt know it could work like this.  Didnt hear about this with the Coutinho deal

 

I'm a little bit sceptical.  But if Mahrez happily agrese to a release clause of 80 mill +, then great.  He will play for that move and the club cant be blamed if nobody buys him.

 

Hard to see how he'd be happy with a release clause thats higher than what we didint let him go for in the January window, but if there is anything in this image rights company stuff you're speaking about, then maybz

the aftermath of mahrez failure to move to man city ( 5 days ) hd caused mahrez trend to hit 1 billion in the Uk , 500 m in Canada , 700 m in the us , and 500 m in India and so on 

 

it seemed that Kia s work has influenced and pushed the owners to seriously work towards a solution ( signs of it  puel has been told to focus on his players and mahrez is not available as this case needs our full intention and concentration ) 

Edited 6 February 2018 by Almo-Fox

[AlloverthefloorYesNdidi]

2 minutes ago, Almo-Fox said:

the aftermath of mahrez failure to move to man city ( 5 days ) hd caused mahrez trend to hit 1 billion in the Uk , 500 m in Canada , 700 m in the us , and 500 m in India and so on 

 

it seemed that Kia s work has influenced and pushed the owners to seriously work towards a solution ( signs of , puel has been told to focus on his players and mahrez is not available as this case needs our full intention and concentration ) 

Well, if there is any truth in that then this is a new world we live in

 

Throw a strop, become more famous and consequently become a more valuable prospect for big clubs....?