Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just a quick thread as I haven’t seen one but off the bench against Liverpool and Bournemouth he has two assists . Long live the nacho man keep it up brother 

Edited by stulcfc
  • Like 1
Posted

The only way I see us accomadate him is a 352 do you agree ? I think that formation along with 99% of fans would agree do you? I cants see whys Puel can’t see it.

Posted
42 minutes ago, STUHILL said:

I have mentioned 352 or more specifically 3-4-1-2 about 20x in my posts tonight and make no apologies for it lol

 

It suits and gets the best out of Chilwell, Pereira, Maguire and partners Vardy and Iheanacho together. What's not to like? 

 

Puel has 0 history of it though, but surely he can see what so many others do and certainly enough to try it

 

53 minutes ago, stulcfc said:

The only way I see us accomadate him is a 352 do you agree ? I think that formation along with 99% of fans would agree do you? I cants see whys Puel can’t see it.

We can all set up multiple accounts Stu...

 

 

 

 

 

(I also think Nacho and JV would work...) 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Oxfordfox83 said:

 

We can all set up multiple accounts Stu...

 

 

 

 

 

(I also think Nacho and JV would work...) 

Set them both up 13 years ago, just for this moment! :thumbup:

Posted
1 hour ago, STUHILL said:

I have mentioned 352 or more specifically 3-4-1-2 about 20x in my posts tonight and make no apologies for it lol

 

It suits and gets the best out of Chilwell, Pereira, Maguire and partners Vardy and Iheanacho together. What's not to like? 

 

Puel has 0 history of it though, but surely he can see what so many others do and certainly enough to try it

Wow, great way to sneak in a we should play 3 at the back thread in disguise! Bravo ??

Posted

Best cross of the season too.

 

I'd like to see two up front. I never have been a fan of one forward - it's alright if they make a three and they're actually good at it (ie Salah/Mane/Firminho).

  • Like 2
Posted

I think some forgot iheanacho’s strong end to last season, looked to have finally nailed that no.10 role, seems a shame to me if we don’t see vardy, iheanacho and Maddison start in a few games together.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, dynamark said:

good  play from nacho.I still feel he will make the grade given time

Come on man this is Foxestalk, a lot of people don't understand the concept of allowing for time.

  • Like 2
Posted
10 hours ago, STUHILL said:

I want to see him starting alongside Vardy, in a new formation with Maddison behind them.

 

Vardy is just too isolated and easily dealt with when on his own in this new system. 

 

Nacho was showing real signs of quality last season when he was partnered with Vardy. Get him on and lets get a partnership going

This all day long....

Posted
4 minutes ago, lgfualol said:

Everything just screams for 352. Only problem is we only have 2 proper strikers. Can Ghezzal play up top? 

I would be sidelining Gray for a couple of games ..Nacho with Vardy ,Ghezzal plays.. 

Let Gray,Ghezzal,Albrighton compete for places....

 

The hardest of hard descisions...is Ndidi   doing enough...The last man I usually criticise,but so far he's well off where we need him to be..

  • Like 2
Posted

Surprised we don't have a 3 5 2 thread!

 

Nacho won't have a chance to develop without this and Vardy cannot work alone particularly against the bigger defenders

 

We are playing a far too open game and I don't think any 2 at centre back would have coped with so little support from the wing backs and other team members yesterday - to be honest Morgan and Maguire could both have been sent off

  • Like 2
Posted
13 hours ago, stulcfc said:

The only way I see us accomadate him is a 352 do you agree ? I think that formation along with 99% of fans would agree do you? I cants see whys Puel can’t see it.

I don't think Claude wanted to go quite so adventurous against the mighty footballing powerhouse that is Bournemouth, tbh.

Posted
16 hours ago, stulcfc said:

The only way I see us accomadate him is a 352 do you agree ? I think that formation along with 99% of fans would agree do you? I cants see whys Puel can’t see it.

Agree this is our strongest formation, with two full backs, who are wing backs, and can’t defend in a back 4, it’s the way to play, I share your frustration, 3-5-2 please Claude 

Posted
22 hours ago, stulcfc said:

Just a quick thread as I haven’t seen one but off the bench against Liverpool and Bournemouth he has two assists . Long live the nacho man keep it up brother 

Got a fair few last season. Please can we just fcukin go 3-4-1-2 with Maddison behind him and Vardy? It's so blantantly obvious as the formation to fit the players in we want. Stupidity for our manager yet again.

Posted
11 hours ago, fuchsntf said:

This all day long....

 

11 hours ago, fuchsntf said:

I would be sidelining Gray for a couple of games ..Nacho with Vardy ,Ghezzal plays.. 

Let Gray,Ghezzal,Albrighton compete for places....

 

The hardest of hard descisions...is Ndidi   doing enough...The last man I usually criticise,but so far he's well off where we need him to be..

The problem with NDiddi is he's trying to do too much. We need another in there with him and Mendy.

Gray is only average and not deliving enough. Ghezzal offer so much more and when you consider he's only finding his feet.

Madison and Vardy are both too isolated. Madison needs someone from midfield to step forward and assist him. Likewise Vardy is left to challenge for scraps.At least with Kelechi beside him it would split the defense. Making it easier to find one of them.

 

The Good news is the problems are fixable but will take a little time.

Posted
12 hours ago, Edingleyfox said:

Surprised we don't have a 3 5 2 thread!

 

Nacho won't have a chance to develop without this and Vardy cannot work alone particularly against the bigger defenders

 

We are playing a far too open game and I don't think any 2 at centre back would have coped with so little support from the wing backs and other team members yesterday - to be honest Morgan and Maguire could both have been sent off

This.

 

It concerns me that Puel is either unaware of this OR he is too stubborn to change his failing system. 

 

i'm not saying that 3-5-2 is suddenly going to change us into world beaters, but it certainly makes the most sense right now and at the very least, should be tried. 

Posted

Problem with Nacho is we have given him chances to start and he never really does anything, Southampton game a prime example. 

 

He only seems to look good enough in dead rubber matches (Spurs/Arsenal last season) pre season friendlies or cup games against lower league opposition. 

Posted
5 hours ago, STUHILL said:

This.

 

It concerns me that Puel is either unaware of this OR he is too stubborn to change his failing system. 

 

i'm not saying that 3-5-2 is suddenly going to change us into world beaters, but it certainly makes the most sense right now and at the very least, should be tried. 

This will be his undoing if he can't get it right. I like what the guy is trying to do and it is only one big defeat so far this season. 

 

It seems he has one way of playing and that's it. I hope I'm wrong though. 

 

Any managers out there that play with 3 at the back? :ph34r:

Posted
On 16/09/2018 at 07:17, STUHILL said:

I have mentioned 352 or more specifically 3-4-1-2 about 20x in my posts tonight and make no apologies for it lol

 

It suits and gets the best out of Chilwell, Pereira, Maguire and partners Vardy and Iheanacho together. What's not to like? 

 

Puel has 0 history of it though, but surely he can see what so many others do and certainly enough to try it

The only thing that mitigates against this is that it would be difficult to shoehorn Gray into a starting spot. Got to say that, at least at the moment, that isn’t much of a loss.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 16/09/2018 at 00:00, STUHILL said:

I want to see him starting alongside Vardy, in a new formation with Maddison behind them.

 

Vardy is just too isolated and easily dealt with when on his own in this new system. 

 

Nacho was showing real signs of quality last season when he was partnered with Vardy. Get him on and lets get a partnership going

Yes, yes, yes. Could not agree more. I have a lot of respect for the way Puel has gone about reinvigorating the squad, but I think he needs to be more flexible tactically. 3-5-2 is the obvious choice?

Posted
2 hours ago, MattP said:

Problem with Nacho is we have given him chances to start and he never really does anything, Southampton game a prime example. 

 

He only seems to look good enough in dead rubber matches (Spurs/Arsenal last season) pre season friendlies or cup games against lower league opposition. 

My argument there is, he's still barely had a run of games and although he's not been amazing he's still chipping in with assists and a few goals here and there. The likes of Chilwell and Gray have been given game after game to try and begood enough for this level, Iheanacho finally gets what appears to be a 3 game stretch to make his mark and he's subbed after an hour vs Southampton after an assist that got us level in the game, after 55 mins vs Fleetwood and then didn't even start vs Liverpool where we didn't play a striker. Low and behold he comes on after an hour, sets one up and we finally started looking threatening.

 

I don't think Puel rates him, which is scandalous given he's let go every other fcukin attacker we had.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...