Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, purpleronnie said:

Imagine being a forest fan reading this thread.

 

Makes us look like a right bunch of bitter whiners.

Not sure about that just calling it as it was. They got unbelievably lucky. 

1 minute ago, Corky said:

Dreadful game, shocking refereeing. Huddersfield will moan about the penalties but they created nothing.

They created 2 pens which weren’t given, if they’d scored them they are promoted to the prem.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Unabomber said:

Not sure about that just calling it as it was. They got unbelievably lucky. 

They created 2 pens which weren’t given, if they’d scored them they are promoted to the prem.

They didn't have a shot on target, mate. I know we're biased but Huddersfield didn't do enough.

 

Don't rely on Jon Moss

Posted
2 minutes ago, Corky said:

They didn't have a shot on target, mate. I know we're biased but Huddersfield didn't do enough.

 

Don't rely on Jon Moss

Please I’m clutching at straws here 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Fox92 said:

We all wanted Huddersfield to win but they didn't deserve to.

0 shots on target in a play off final ffs.

But equally should have had 2 penalties, so that's their chances. However they come about they are chances, nobody is mentioning the lack of shots on target if they score 2 penalties. So they very much deserved the chance to have a chance of winning, which they were denied.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

But equally should have had 2 penalties, so that's their chances. However they come about they are chances, nobody is mentioning the lack of shots on target if they score 2 penalties. So they very much deserved the chance to have a chance of winning, which they were denied.

I probably would do still. 

Relying on two penalties, regardless of given or not given, isn't good enough in a play off final.

Posted
1 minute ago, Fox92 said:

I probably would do still. 

Relying on two penalties, regardless of given or not given, isn't good enough in a play off final.

It is if you score them. They were denied the opportunity.

Posted
Just now, ARTY_FOX said:

can someone post the penalty decisions?

 

I can post a picture of Jon Moss as he looked at them.

 

2c5c4aba40a124e91bc2cd8855de52f3.thumb.jpg.6a8850d0b9e02ff0b927dccd2fbea24a.jpg

Posted
2 minutes ago, The Bear said:

Lol yeah they do. 

 

41 games, 82 points. 2ppg over the vast majority of the season with 1.76 goals per game. 

 

Notts Forest deservd zero respect. Arrogant fan base for a club that's been bouncing between 2nd abd 3rd tier for over two decades 

  • Like 1
Posted

If refs are regarded as full time pros at the top of their profession I think the retirement should be looked at. 47 was the retirement age at one time. I don't buy this they are fitter now and pass tests etc. I'm not ageist at my age why would I be. Seeing Moss so far behind play is a case in point

Posted (edited)

Ugh, my forest supporting in-laws unbearable already. 

 

My brother-in-law on the suggestion they may look to some of out players transfer listed like Ayoze, Hamza or Amartey, rejects that calling them our cast offs and thinks they'll build slowly.

 

My father-in-law wonders how long is left on vardys contract and whether they'd have a chance

 

family though so what can you do 🤣

Edited by splinterdream
Posted
5 minutes ago, splinterdream said:

Ugh, my forest supporting in-laws unbearable already. 

 

My brother-in-law on the suggestion they may look to some of out players transfer listed like Ayoze, Hamza or Amartey, rejects that calling them our cast offs and thinks they'll build slowly.

 

My father-in-law wonders how long is left on vardys contract and whether they'd have a chance

 

family though so what can you do 🤣


Your wife supports the Red shite? You have it pretty bad! lol

Posted
18 minutes ago, lcfcdamo said:

At least we get a chance for payback for the 4 nil hopefully forest at home first game of season 💪

I wouldn't want them first game, you want them after the initial bounce has faded.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

I probably would do still. 

Relying on two penalties, regardless of given or not given, isn't good enough in a play off final.

Perhaps they’d have had two shots on target if their players hadn’t been hacked down twice in the box.

  • Like 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, ARTY_FOX said:

Probably the 2 easiest decisions they've ever had to make and they got them wrong. ****ing hell. 

They were never going to overrule Jon Moss on HIS big day. Awful decision by the authorities to give him this game. There's no place for sentiment when there is so much riding on a fixture.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...