Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Where do you expect us to finish in the table?  

305 members have voted

  1. 1. OK so its only been 1 game but we can see how all the other teams are shaping up and the signings they've made so realistically where do you expect the Foxes to finish in the 21/22 Premier League Table?

    • Top 4
      54
    • 5th or 6th
      176
    • 7th to 10th
      75


Recommended Posts

Guest TaggertvsWise
Posted

I’m thinking we can hit 4th this year provided we can keep our notable players. We’ll replace Liverpool. Yes they have somebody injuries back but they still haven’t strengthened, they are a couple of incidents away from turmoil again. 

Posted

The second half against Wolves will be a common occurrence in my opinion but we won't always be so lucky to escape the way we did on Saturday.

 

We have always suffered from lack of concentration and silly mistakes and I think that will continue to be the reason we drop too many silly points which go on to cost us near the end of the season.

 

How we got away with 3 points on Saturday is a minor miracle.

Posted
Just now, adejo92 said:

How we got away with 3 points on Saturday is a minor miracle.

down to us scoring 1 goal and Wolves scoring nil...

  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, norwichfox said:

down to us scoring 1 goal and Wolves scoring nil...

I'd say more down to Wolves inability to score golden opportunities.  If you think we'll get away with that all season...

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, adejo92 said:

I'd say more down to Wolves inability to score golden opportunities.  If you think we'll get away with that all season...

but the FACT remains that we scored 1 goal and Wolves scored nil...check how many points each of us have in the league table....

 

by the way....this is the wrong thread for this conversation...

Edited by norwichfox
  • Like 1
Posted

We did not look like a top 5 side in the second half on Saturday.   

 

There are a number of areas where we need to sharpen up.  If we play like that we will be upper mid-table.

 

However, if we can get 11 of our top players on the field together, we will improve.   Two of the starting 11 are not among our top players (imo we have about 17).

 

Barnes will get fitter and stronger.   On Saturday, Maddison had played one or two probing passes before being kicked out of the game.  If these two get a sustained, injury free run, top 4 is possible.   Both have an X factor that is horrible to play against. 

 

 If we buy an X factor right winger, that will make a difference too.  Another way of getting 11 top players on the pitch would be for Pereira to a more advanced position when Castagne returns.  It may not be his best position but he is a top player and it may be our best option.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, norwichfox said:

but the FACT remains that we scored 1 goal and Wolves scored nil...check how many points each of us have in the league table....

 

by the way....this is the wrong thread for this conversation...

I voted where I think we will finish and then commented my justification for that vote so I'd say it's 100% the correct thread.

 

As for conversation, that's the end of it now, but if you are looking for the "Starting needless arguments because someone has a different opinion to your own" thread, I think that got closed a while back.

 

Oh, just rechecked the thread title, I can clarify that it does question where we will 'finish' not where we will be after Match 1.

 

Edited by adejo92
Posted
26 minutes ago, Arriba Los Zorros said:

Wow, lots of pessimism in this thread! We should aim for top 4 with this team, this is a golden era at LCFC and lets rack up the achievements while we have the team to do it! I would be very surprised if we finished below 6th place.

Nobody is saying that we won't aim for top 4...this is just about expectations

  • Like 2
Posted

Top four was on with Fofana looking immense. That terrible injury will make a difference to our season and I think we should be realistic about that. 
 

I’m afraid we’re looking at 5th to 7th with Amartey/Vestergaard substituting instead. This will become more apparent in the games where we’re under the kosh. 

Posted (edited)

5th again I think.

 

Top four will be a far tougher nut to crack with the depressing amount of spending going on. That said, got a funny feeling Man City are going to have a season of regression - it's more a matter of how extreme that regression is. If they really go down the pan, got a funny feeling it could be us and them battling for 4th this time around.

 

The rest of the 'big four' had piss-easy opening fixtures, so can't read too much into their wins, but I see Chelsea as the favourites this time out. Let's see how they all get on against opposition less likely to roll over before we can make a real judgement on how much they've improved.

Edited by OntarioFox
Posted

With how many threads of this format have been done I think I've now covered every single league position so a nice bit of bragging to do when I call it bang on.

Posted
3 hours ago, winteriscoming said:

I can see an unknown like West Ham last season challenging the top 6. There’s always a surprise at the top and bottom in the league. I see us finishing between 7th and 10th. Can see europa taking its toll on us this season. 

I suspect West Ham will fall off towards mid-table, starting from Antonio's invariably inevitable spell on the treatment table. 

Posted
3 hours ago, adejo92 said:

I'd say more down to Wolves inability to score golden opportunities.  If you think we'll get away with that all season...

The same stick could have been hit with us on Saturday. Vardy and Barnes both with glorious chances 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, OntarioFox said:

5th again I think.

 

Top four will be a far tougher nut to crack with the depressing amount of spending going on. That said, got a funny feeling Man City are going to have a season of regression - it's more a matter of how extreme that regression is. If they really go down the pan, got a funny feeling it could be us and them battling for 4th this time around.

 

The rest of the 'big four' had piss-easy opening fixtures, so can't read too much into their wins, but I see Chelsea as the favourites this time out. Let's see how they all get on against opposition less likely to roll over before we can make a real judgement on how much they've improved.

Curiously, I also have a funny feeling about Man City - that they might conceivably 'regress' from 1st to 2d while Harry Kane scores tons of goals for them! lol

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, adejo92 said:

The second half against Wolves will be a common occurrence in my opinion but we won't always be so lucky to escape the way we did on Saturday.

 

We have always suffered from lack of concentration and silly mistakes and I think that will continue to be the reason we drop too many silly points which go on to cost us near the end of the season.

 

How we got away with 3 points on Saturday is a minor miracle.

3 hours ago, majaco said:

We did not look like a top 5 side in the second half on Saturday.   

 

There are a number of areas where we need to sharpen up.  If we play like that we will be upper mid-table.

 

However, if we can get 11 of our top players on the field together, we will improve.   Two of the starting 11 are not among our top players (imo we have about 17).

 

Barnes will get fitter and stronger.   On Saturday, Maddison had played one or two probing passes before being kicked out of the game.  If these two get a sustained, injury free run, top 4 is possible.   Both have an X factor that is horrible to play against. 

 

 If we buy an X factor right winger, that will make a difference too.  Another way of getting 11 top players on the pitch would be for Pereira to a more advanced position when Castagne returns.  It may not be his best position but he is a top player and it may be our best option.

 

Probably the best thing about currently being in the US is that I can DVR our games and leisurely rewatch same much later without the tension and nervousness of watching live action, breaking down segments of the game and rewinding/rewatching key bits of action.

 

Upon rewatching Saturday's game, we frankly were not as "poor" in that second-half as was my initial judgment (and much of the consensus on FT). On the contrary, we actually professionally managed much of the game and frankly could have grabbed 1 or 2 more goals. 

 

Not to rubbish Wolves, who improved markedly during the second-half, but upon rewatching the best they could have done (and obviously it easy to prognosticate in hindsight) was wrestle a point, given that though they had a lot of "shots" Kasper was barely called upon to make any serious saves.

 

Early doors, but frankly I am much more comfortable with the team now than I was post-game on Saturday. Even the variously-criticized Vestergaard and the much-criticized Amartey were not as "poor" as alleged. They each made the odd miscues (Amartey with two horrid passes to the opposition), but their overall showing was more than decent.

 

Edited by NaijaFox
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, adejo92 said:

I'd say more down to Wolves inability to score golden opportunities.  If you think we'll get away with that all season...

Compare then...the chances "We" failed to convert,or an attack just missed out, on Early season Timing und weight of ball...

 

I want to See 5 games before I would even consider predictions...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...