Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

"Most Liverpool fans are not scousers" is such a lazy comment. They have a big fan base but most regular match going Liverpool fans are scousers.

They have more fans living more than 25miles from their ground than any other club.

Posted
6 minutes ago, tom27111 said:

 

You ever been to Anfield? lol

Yes many a time. The majority of the Kop will be Scousers, the main stand has a fair share of day trippers of course. Same as Old Trafford, same as Etihad, same as Stamford Bridge. 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

sure it was this ref that gave that handball when it hit Morgans head only if we had VAR then

2 of the worst penalty decisions you'll ever see

Edited by ARTY_FOX
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

sure it was this ref that gave that handball when it hit Morgans head only if we had VAR then

One of the most egregious corrupt/ incompetent refereeing I’ve ever seen 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, foxestalkisfullofidiots said:

I really don’t know why people get so offended by That feed the scousers chant, the reality is poverty and child hunger is way higher in a lot more cities than Liverpool, it’s a nationwide problem and most Liverpool fans are not scousers, it’s like a slim person getting offended if you called them fat, it has no foundation but I guess if you look hard enough you will find something offensive, it’s football fans trying to wind up other football fans

You've highlighted quite rightly that it's a hardship which affects millions more people than just people from Liverpool, so we shouldn't take offence? If they sang it about Mancunian's or Geordie's, I'd take just as much umbrage with it. Your logic makes it even more sinister. Sure, it's intended to wind up, but at the expense of people who have little control on whether they eat each day? Really? At what point does basic human compassion come into it? Also the bit about Liverpool fans is balderdash. Any match going fan will tell you that that isn't true. 

Edited by kingkisnorbo
Posted
Just now, Spiritwalker said:

They have more fans living more than 25miles from their ground than any other club.

I am not surprised given how successful they have been in history but that doesn't mean they have local fans too, and they will have a lot.

 

In the future your stat will probably change to Manchester City Every time we play them away from home I see more of their fans pile out of Piccadilly than I do when we play Man Utd.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

Why wasn't Diaz booked for revealing a message on his shirt under his kit?

The booking is for taking it off, which he didn’t do. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

Why wasn't Diaz booked for revealing a message on his shirt under his kit?

Why are you bothered? He didn’t even take his shirt off 

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Trev3939 said:

The booking is for taking it off, which he didn’t do. 

You aren't allowed to reveal any message, be it political, commercial or personal under your shirt.

  • Sad 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Unabomber said:

Why are you bothered? He didn’t even take his shirt off 

Just remembering Demarai Gray scoring the winner v Cardiff a week after the club chairman died in a horrific helicopter crash, and he lifted his shirt to reveal "RIP Vichai", and getting booked and it was insisted that it's irrelevant what the message is, lifting a shirt to reveal any message is a bookable offence.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

Just remembering Demarai Gray scoring the winner v Cardiff a week after the club chairman died in a horrific helicopter crash, and he lifted his shirt to reveal "RIP Vichai", and getting booked and it was insisted that it's irrelevant what the message is, lifting a shirt to reveal any message is a bookable offence.

Gray's was a stupid booking as would Diaz's have been today.

 

Just because it happened to us doesn't mean I want to see a player booked for it.

  • Like 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

Gray's was a stupid booking as would Diaz's have been today.

 

Just because it happened to us doesn't mean I want to see a player booked for it.

I don't think either should be booked, just another example of poor inconsistent refereeing in this country.

  • Like 1
Posted

There's something John Gregory circa 1999 about Arteta. A man in his 40's with suspiciously dark hair, whining about everything whilst virtually watching the match standing on the pitch.

  • Haha 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...