Cesare Casadei

[lcfc_forever]

28 minutes ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

Surely it's the opposite? He was recalled because he wasn't getting enough appearances, which is what Chelsea thought we had agreed to? 

Nope  what I mean here is we kept playing him or bringing him off the bench, even though his performances were average until recently as we had to in order to ensure we could keep him for the season. 

[lcfc_forever]

17 minutes ago, Chelmofox said:

The implication is that we were playing him when he wasn't good enough to try and meet the agreed appearances. Even in doing so, we didn't play him enough.

 

Hate Chelsea. All they had to do is watch him to understand there were times he wasn't up to speed, and others where he was showing promise. A 2nd half season for him chasing a Championship title would have been the best development for him.

Exactly

[Reg Vardy]

Funny how most posters on here don't/didn't rate him, yet the same posters usually end up saying its nod good for us......he was a loan signing.....Chelsea can do what they like......we have to honour the agreement whatever that was....opportunity for someone tonight.....

[Claridge]

Glad he isn’t playing tonight, bang average at best, 

[Chelmofox]

2 minutes ago, Claridge said:

Glad he isn’t playing tonight, bang average at best, 

Tonight wouldn't have been a good game for him at all, but Enzo would have likely started him. Was poor when pressed and the opposition was pacy.

[STEVIE B]

The Metro reporting Chelsea recalled him as he was playing with an injury. 

[ThumbsUp]

4 minutes ago, STEVIE B said:

The Metro reporting Chelsea recalled him as he was playing with an injury. 

They said it's because Enzo Fernandez was playing with an injury

[ClaphamFox]

4 minutes ago, STEVIE B said:

The Metro reporting Chelsea recalled him as he was playing with an injury. 

Not quite. They're reporting that Chelsea recalled him because Enzo Fernandez has been playing with an injury and they need cover.

[honeybradger]

2 hours ago, Claridge said:

Glad he isn’t playing tonight, bang average at best, 

Who are we going to play instead of him though with Dewsbury hall and Ndidi injured. Praet and Akgun are on a similar level to Casadei (that's assuming Praet is even fit).

[Sol thewall Bamba]

Good job he went back, straight into the squad for Chelsea tonight!

[LFEFox23]

41 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Good job he went back, straight into the squad for Chelsea tonight!

Cup tied?

[baldeagle]

26 minutes ago, LFEFox23 said:

Cup tied?

He’s on the bench 

[jayfox26]

1 hour ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Good job he went back, straight into the squad for Chelsea tonight!

He can't play tonight or in the fa Cup at the weekend as he's cup tied, so Chelsea could have at least let us keep him until after the Birmingham game. Hope we don't ever deal with them silly bastards again! Horrible football club!

[jayfox26]

4 minutes ago, baldeagle said:

He’s on the bench 

He might be there but he's not actually a substitute and he can't actually play as he's cup tied. Would actually love it if they put him on and then got kicked out of the cup but even Chelsea aren't that stupid unfortunately 

[jayfox26]

Chelsea with a bench of regens. Ted Curd is my favourite. Reckon it's probably Boehly naming himself on the bench and changing his surname hoping nobody notices 

[Alf Bentley]

2 minutes ago, jayfox26 said:

Chelsea with a bench of regens. Ted Curd is my favourite. Reckon it's probably Boehly naming himself on the bench and changing his surname hoping nobody notices 

 

Nah, Ted Curd  is his real name. He's rubbish, though. Always ducks a challenge - completely yellow. An absolute lemon, if you ask me. 

[jayfox26]

Just now, Alf Bentley said:

 

Nah, Ted Curd  is his real name. He's rubbish, though. Always ducks a challenge - completely yellow. An absolute lemon, if you ask me. 

I think you're talking turd to be honest 

[baldeagle]

10 minutes ago, jayfox26 said:

He might be there but he's not actually a substitute and he can't actually play as he's cup tied. Would actually love it if they put him on and then got kicked out of the cup but even Chelsea aren't that stupid unfortunately 

BBC website cock up then  as he was listed as a sub but not now . 

[DJ Barry Hammond]

He’s certainly unlucky he played for us in both cups, given he’d probably  been on the bench tonight and got a run out tonight (and possibly on Friday).

[Chelmofox]

2 minutes ago, DJ Barry Hammond said:

He’s certainly unlucky he played for us in both cups, given he’d probably  been on the bench tonight and got a run out tonight (and possibly on Friday).

Unlucky?. He was on fudging loan.

[funkyrobot]

1 hour ago, jayfox26 said:

He might be there but he's not actually a substitute and he can't actually play as he's cup tied. Would actually love it if they put him on and then got kicked out of the cup but even Chelsea aren't that stupid unfortunately 

Yeh he can’t play for them until 4th Feb! 

[Kuredufox]

Just came on as sub against the Scallies

[CrispinLA in Texas]

5 minutes ago, Kuredufox said:

Just came on as sub against the Scallies

Late sub 85th minute...... just like here

[Lako42]

Chelsea have spent 7 billion squid every year for the last 15 years and this lad gets on

 

 

Love how badly ran they are

[LCFCJohn]

Interesting. So this rules out any loan back out to another club now he has appeared for 2 teams this reason (I believe this is still the correct rule)?