Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Do they? What's the benefit to another big 6 team in giving Chelsea £40m on their bottom line? 

partially unimaginative signings isn’t it. They are at another big club so they must be good. 

 

Someone will overpay for gallagher if he’s available, which it sounds like he is.  They are just able to put unreasonable prices on players and teams will pay it. 

 

If we had a striker who we’d loaned to southampton  and he’d done well, before spending a season on our bench (while our striker couldn’t hit anything with a banjo), got injured for ages, then sat on fulham bench…. would we dream of demanding 30m? would anyone even be daft enough to think about it? 

 

Yet broja may end up at everton for 30m.  makes you sick that they will get out of ffp because of clubs allowing them to get away with their valuations like that.  Surely brojas real value would be at like 12m. 

Edited by Lambert09
  • Like 1
Posted

We need to be aiming for 50 points next season (with all the flak & problems the football authorities are facing I get the feeling that even another PSR breach will only receive a very small points deduction, so 50 points should be enough)..  To achieve that we need our players to be absolutely battling for us and fitting well into the team so that we can optimise our resources.

 

So on balance I think we should keep our best and most committed players even if that causes us to break PSR rules again.  I.e. hold onto KDH unless we're offered an insane price (which is unlikely).

  • Like 1
Posted

The subject of if he is worth 8 points, to add to that, it wouldn't even be 8 points, as Everton shown if there is 2 punishments in one season, the second one is reduced.  So if the EPL found a way to do a points deduction for a breach in our EFL season it should be less than 8 points.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 09/06/2024 at 13:18, MPH said:

His replacement could be worth even more. IF We sell him,

 

 now don’t misunderstand I’d prefer we didn’t but if we get an offer of 40m we should take it. He’s completely replaceable. If there’s one thing there are plenty of in the footballing world,  it’s CMs.

 

selling him,  avoiding a bigger points deduction and buying a replacement would be a much better option than starting the season on -8 or more points.

This mythical replacement that we are going to get with the next to no money we will have to spend that may or may not work out, or keep someone who we know is good probably worth 10 points to the club and loves the club

  • Like 3
Posted
12 hours ago, lcfcbluearmy said:

This mythical replacement that we are going to get with the next to no money we will have to spend that may or may not work out, or keep someone who we know is good probably worth 10 points to the club and loves the club


 

no mythical money situation. If we sell him for 40m in this years it will count towards the FFP regulations. That money doesn’t disappear. We can then use it in the next years budget.

  • Like 2
Posted
9 hours ago, Posthorn54 said:

We need to keep him and he will become club captain in the future 

It was interesting that Enzo had Hamza ahead of him in the captaincy hierarchy. 

Posted
5 hours ago, MPH said:


 

no mythical money situation. If we sell him for 40m in this years it will count towards the FFP regulations. That money doesn’t disappear. We can then use it in the next years budget.

If it only balences us we will still be tight on ffp next yer and won't have 40+ million to spend on one player

Posted
35 minutes ago, lcfcbluearmy said:

If it only balences us we will still be tight on ffp next yer and won't have 40+ million to spend on one player


 


 

im not sure anyone is expecting to spend 40m on one player..

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, MPH said:


 


 

im not sure anyone is expecting to spend 40m on one player..

Yes so we are just magically going to get a better player than KDH for 10-15 m? That's just not going to happen

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, lcfcbluearmy said:

Yes so we are just magically going to get a better player than KDH for 10-15 m? That's just not going to happen

No, we are going to get a worse player but be more financially secure. Just hope it’s a prospect.

  • Sad 1
Posted

Sell him to the other KP owned club for £40 million, then buy him back in a year for the same price or sell him on if he wants out after a year in Europe.

Posted

They seem to be interested in Longstaff from Newcastle as good likely replacement aren't they? 

Posted
3 hours ago, lcfcbluearmy said:

Yes so we are just magically going to get a better player than KDH for 10-15 m? That's just not going to happen


how can you be so sure? Maybe we will get someone as good as or better suited to whatever system the new  manager wants to play..

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Hack said:

They seem to be interested in Longstaff from Newcastle as good likely replacement aren't they? 

If we sell dewbury hall and buy longstaff for 15 mil then that would be a terrible decision. Thankfully that probably wont happen.

  • Like 3
Posted
5 hours ago, lcfcbluearmy said:

Yes so we are just magically going to get a better player than KDH for 10-15 m? That's just not going to happen

Hamer 15mill?

Posted
8 hours ago, Dahnsouff said:

No, we are going to get a worse player but be more financially secure. Just hope it’s a prospect.

Yes and that is a fair point it's just the original post that I responded too claimed we could get a better player

Posted
28 minutes ago, lcfcbluearmy said:

Yes and that is a fair point it's just the original post that I responded too claimed we could get a better player

Always possible I guess, just seems unlikely.

Posted

So it’s almost a week into the transfer window and there’s been barely a whisper of KDH leaving any time soon. Were all those stories about him being sold before the end of June to avoid another PSR breach completely wide of the mark? 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

Probably can't get to the door quick enough. 

"Kiernan's got a great engine so he's doing a great job defensively on the left [of midfield] for us, it's not his natural position but his workrate is such an asset whilst Stephy is out. It means we can Yatesy forward more often and be a goal threat in the box"

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, ClaphamFox said:

So it’s almost a week into the transfer window and there’s been barely a whisper of KDH leaving any time soon. Were all those stories about him being sold before the end of June to avoid another PSR breach completely wide of the mark? 

A massive 'elephant in the room' question, this is.

 

Are we just ignoring PSR for 23/24 ? (unbelievably risky, if so!)

Do we comply, and therefore we don't have to sell?

Do we have something else up our sleeve to comply?

 

The silence is deafening 

Posted

This is the big one. There's so many variables in this it's untrue.

 

I think we're just going to ignore the PSR for last season, and pray. It makes sense in a crazy, cold and logical way. But it could go very wrong.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...