Trav Le Bleu Posted 1 January Posted 1 January 3 minutes ago, Wymsey said: A car exploded next to a Trump Hotel.. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz7qd97eyp0o Not a car, a cyber truck. Kekius Maximus is already making his play. Ave, President Maximus! 1
Dunge Posted 1 January Posted 1 January 2 hours ago, Sly said: The worst thing they do, is to name these people. It gives them the air time they crave for the Unfortunately, if you don’t then it’s fuel for the conspiracy theorists.
SkidsFox Posted 2 January Posted 2 January On 31/12/2024 at 16:14, Robo61 said: As I am sure you well know, the only part of the criminal justice system the major has any control over is police and even there he shares responsibility with the Home Secretary, so struggling to see how you can say he his responsible for overseeing the increase in crime, which of course we have seen across the country. Luckily the residents of London are well aware that it's the national government who are responsible for crime and policing, which is probably why Khan has been elected three times. The one issue where he's seen as responsible - ULEZ and the congestion charges - are where he gets criticism from people living on the outer parts of London (or driving in), but those in much of London are in favour of a cleaner environment (particularly for their kids). Of course it helps if you have a good public transport system so no need to drive a polluting car. 3
moore_94 Posted 2 January Posted 2 January Terrorist attack in New Orleans Trump Tower cyber truck exploding Now a mass shooting in Queens American is starting the year well 1 1
Wymsey Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 4 minutes ago, moore_94 said: Terrorist attack in New Orleans Trump Tower cyber truck exploding Now a mass shooting in Queens American is starting the year well At least the UK is fairly safe..
foxy boxing Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 56 minutes ago, moore_94 said: Terrorist attack in New Orleans Trump Tower cyber truck exploding Now a mass shooting in Queens American is starting the year well Need to see if they can top last year's mass shootings total , with Trump coming back it's gonna be all guns blazing let the slaughter commence!.
The boy Linacre Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 1 hour ago, moore_94 said: Terrorist attack in New Orleans Trump Tower cyber truck exploding Now a mass shooting in Queens American is starting the year well Normal service in the nuthouse resumed, right to bear arms and destroy
Mike Oxlong Posted 2 January Posted 2 January Important news (FFS ! ) https://news.sky.com/story/duchess-of-sussex-returns-to-instagram-with-new-year-beach-video-13282697 Meghan now wishes to promote "a joyful and thoughtful approach to online engagement - one that fosters meaningful connections and inspires positivity in today's digital space", according to the spokesperson. They added: "While there is still work to be done, she feels confident that by returning to Instagram, she can amplify the progress made so far and lead by example in demonstrating the potential for social media to bring joy and positive connection. "By stepping back into this space, the duchess hopes to authentically share moments of joy and inspiration from her life while continuing to advocate for safer, more positive online experiences-particularly for young people and families."
Torquay Gunner Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 16 minutes ago, Mike Oxlong said: Important news (FFS ! ) https://news.sky.com/story/duchess-of-sussex-returns-to-instagram-with-new-year-beach-video-13282697 Meghan now wishes to promote "a joyful and thoughtful approach to online engagement - one that fosters meaningful connections and inspires positivity in today's digital space", according to the spokesperson. They added: "While there is still work to be done, she feels confident that by returning to Instagram, she can amplify the progress made so far and lead by example in demonstrating the potential for social media to bring joy and positive connection. "By stepping back into this space, the duchess hopes to authentically share moments of joy and inspiration from her life while continuing to advocate for safer, more positive online experiences-particularly for young people and families." I feel so much better now. 1
Wymsey Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 3 hours ago, Mike Oxlong said: Important news (FFS ! ) https://news.sky.com/story/duchess-of-sussex-returns-to-instagram-with-new-year-beach-video-13282697 Meghan now wishes to promote "a joyful and thoughtful approach to online engagement - one that fosters meaningful connections and inspires positivity in today's digital space", according to the spokesperson. They added: "While there is still work to be done, she feels confident that by returning to Instagram, she can amplify the progress made so far and lead by example in demonstrating the potential for social media to bring joy and positive connection. "By stepping back into this space, the duchess hopes to authentically share moments of joy and inspiration from her life while continuing to advocate for safer, more positive online experiences-particularly for young people and families." Am not sure what to make of her and Harry, to be honest. Am not sure if they're genuine in general, or only thinking about themselves.
Nalis Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 4 hours ago, Mike Oxlong said: Important news (FFS ! ) https://news.sky.com/story/duchess-of-sussex-returns-to-instagram-with-new-year-beach-video-13282697 Meghan now wishes to promote "a joyful and thoughtful approach to online engagement - one that fosters meaningful connections and inspires positivity in today's digital space", according to the spokesperson. They added: "While there is still work to be done, she feels confident that by returning to Instagram, she can amplify the progress made so far and lead by example in demonstrating the potential for social media to bring joy and positive connection. "By stepping back into this space, the duchess hopes to authentically share moments of joy and inspiration from her life while continuing to advocate for safer, more positive online experiences-particularly for young people and families." Just when you think the world is going to shit, we get this wonderful news to lift our collective spirits.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 45 minutes ago, Wymsey said: Am not sure what to make of her and Harry, to be honest. Am not sure if they're genuine in general, or only thinking about themselves. I think that they they think no they're genuine, but both have had upbringings that have twisted their perspectives so that they have no idea what a normal, everyday existence is for your average person. They seem generally benevolent, but there's this needy aura of adoration that masks it. A kind of, "oh, I couldn't possibly... but if you insist!" When no one's insisting.
Paninistickers Posted 2 January Posted 2 January (edited) FBI now reckon it was lone Wolf attack. Which was always the most likely scenario. just a bit odd why they originally seemed so keen to worry people that there was some kind of cell still on the loose. Edited 2 January by Paninistickers On the
BKLFox Posted 2 January Posted 2 January Suspected people smugglers will face travel bans, social media blackouts and phone restrictions under new laws, the government has announced. & if that don’t work they still got the naughty step & being sent to bed without any dinner up their sleeve 😂 1
leicsmac Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 11 minutes ago, BKLFox said: Suspected people smugglers will face travel bans, social media blackouts and phone restrictions under new laws, the government has announced. & if that don’t work they still got the naughty step & being sent to bed without any dinner up their sleeve 😂 ... I'm a little curious about what should be done given that the key word in that first sentence is "suspected", and the last time I checked the UK was a civilised nation of laws where the state punishment tends to follow a conviction in a court of law? 2
CosbehFox Posted 2 January Posted 2 January The latest tactic by the think tanks behind Trump, Musk, Farage is utter gutter stuff. Bringing up old cases of child abuse (and Robinson’s solitary confinement). Horrific 1
leicsmac Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 3 minutes ago, CosbehFox said: The latest tactic by the think tanks behind Trump, Musk, Farage is utter gutter stuff. Bringing up old cases of child abuse (and Robinson’s solitary confinement). Horrific When your objective is power at any cost, then the ends justify any means. Nothing such folks would do would come as a surprise to me.
Parafox Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 7 hours ago, Mike Oxlong said: Important news (FFS ! ) https://news.sky.com/story/duchess-of-sussex-returns-to-instagram-with-new-year-beach-video-13282697 Meghan now wishes to promote "a joyful and thoughtful approach to online engagement - one that fosters meaningful connections and inspires positivity in today's digital space", according to the spokesperson. They added: "While there is still work to be done, she feels confident that by returning to Instagram, she can amplify the progress made so far and lead by example in demonstrating the potential for social media to bring joy and positive connection. "By stepping back into this space, the duchess hopes to authentically share moments of joy and inspiration from her life while continuing to advocate for safer, more positive online experiences-particularly for young people and families." 3 hours ago, Wymsey said: Am not sure what to make of her and Harry, to be honest. Am not sure if they're genuine in general, or only thinking about themselves. 2 hours ago, Trav Le Bleu said: I think that they they think no they're genuine, but both have had upbringings that have twisted their perspectives so that they have no idea what a normal, everyday existence is for your average person. They seem generally benevolent, but there's this needy aura of adoration that masks it. A kind of, "oh, I couldn't possibly... but if you insist!" When no one's insisting. She's an American gold-digger and he's an easy target. Their lives make no difference to society despite what they think. They are meaningless, minor celebrities. She thinks she some kind of influential "Royal princess". He is a gullible fool. Like his Uncle Andrew. 1 1
BKLFox Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 11 minutes ago, leicsmac said: ... I'm a little curious about what should be done given that the key word in that first sentence is "suspected", and the last time I checked the UK was a civilised nation of laws where the state punishment tends to follow a conviction in a court of law? Can you stop burner phones & by virtue of them being people smugglers I’m not sure taking away a passport (if they have 1) will stop them using ‘their own’ routes in/out of the country. It’s a bit of a nothing deterrent & statement
leicsmac Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 3 minutes ago, BKLFox said: Can you stop burner phones & by virtue of them being people smugglers I’m not sure taking away a passport (if they have 1) will stop them using ‘their own’ routes in/out of the country. It’s a bit of a nothing deterrent & statement I don't disagree, but I was curious to know what would be more effective.
Otis Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 39 minutes ago, BKLFox said: Suspected people smugglers will face travel bans, social media blackouts and phone restrictions under new laws, the government has announced. & if that don’t work they still got the naughty step & being sent to bed without any dinner up their sleeve 😂 After 6 months in charge this is thier proposal to smash the gangs...Laughable...
Otis Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 28 minutes ago, leicsmac said: ... I'm a little curious about what should be done given that the key word in that first sentence is "suspected", and the last time I checked the UK was a civilised nation of laws where the state punishment tends to follow a conviction in a court of law? Plenty of people on remand that are waiting conviction, so I'm sure it's legal. In practice it won't make a jot of difference.
leicsmac Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 2 minutes ago, Otis said: After 6 months in charge this is thier proposal to smash the gangs...Laughable... 7 minutes ago, leicsmac said: I don't disagree, but I was curious to know what would be more effective. Beyond media soundbites and things that don't involve massively hypocritical restrictions of civil liberties, that is.
leicsmac Posted 2 January Posted 2 January (edited) 6 minutes ago, Otis said: Plenty of people on remand that are waiting conviction, so I'm sure it's legal. In practice it won't make a jot of difference. .... and those that are not? Pardon for pressing the point, but there seems to be many issues right now where it's a vogue to talk about the problems and ineffective solutions (as accurate as it may be) rather than actual workable answers. Edit: don't get me wrong, I understand the argument made, it's just not so simply solved. Edited 2 January by leicsmac
Parafox Posted 2 January Posted 2 January 6 minutes ago, Otis said: Plenty of people on remand that are waiting conviction, so I'm sure it's legal. In practice it won't make a jot of difference. Talk is cheap. Say the things people want to hear and mostly, they'll bury their heads in the skanky press and fail to understand what's really happening. 1
Recommended Posts