Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, SkidsFox said:

A bit of a stab in the dark, but maybe they're there to do some training?

Football players in playing football shocker.

Posted

5 mins ago my mate who frequents the dogging lay-by near Seagrave was in the process of Rodgering an ex vertically challenged manager in the boot of his car. He’s got a bad back and is being treated by the club physio cash in hand, but I digress. Anyway, in the midst of passion he bobbed up his head and caught the shine from a bald head in a car pulling into Seagrave. Apparently it was Lee Carsley.

Posted
1 minute ago, LFox99 said:

 

 

Wrong fit but hired him still, christ this board

Ignoring the fact they knew he was wrong fit and went for it anyway, why do we have growing PSR issues. Swear they just bowl out the word now 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, LFox99 said:

 

 

Wrong fit but hired him still, christ this board

Tbf they probably thought we were heading for a 15 point deduction and a transfer embargo. In those circumstances, it makes sense to bring in a worse, cheaper option.

 

Hopefully we hired him with plenty of release clauses in case we wriggled out of the punishment...

Posted
5 minutes ago, LFox99 said:

 

 

Wrong fit but hired him still, christ this board

If this doesn't lead to an almighty change in the board, I swear...

Posted
Just now, Bilo said:

If this doesn't lead to an almighty change in the board, I swear...

when I ran companies we always said that whatever may happen in the future we must be ready - we should have a plan and some options ready int he draw.  I though all organisations did this....

Posted
7 minutes ago, LFox99 said:

 

 

Wrong fit but hired him still, christ this board

Then went on to sign Bobby Reid, Oliver Skipp and Jordan Ayew that made no improvement to the starting 11/had any resale value, but added to the manager's requirement of PL experience. 

  • Like 1
Posted

So let's recap:

 

The board didn't want to hire Cooper in the first place but did so anyway for some reason.

THEN the board already had concerns about PSR and decided to hand Cooper a 3 year deal instead of a 1+x type Situation (if Cooper wouldn't have agreed to this we should have just called his bluff, who the **** is gonna hire him).

 

And if that wasn't bad enough, with a candidate in place none of them (bar Rudkin obviously) wanted they didn't think a potential replacement incase of a sacking that could very well come would be handy? Didn't we ****ing learn ANYTHING from Brendan?

Posted

If we get away with this and appoint RVN, who then turns out to be decent, I don't want to see anyone giving the board credit. It's blind luck if it works out.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
Just now, SecretPro said:

WHAT DO YOU KNOW

That Rudkin and Top may not know who to go for, now.

Edited by Wymsey

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...