Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, foxes_rule1978 said:

To be honest I checked out of the online opinion of managers when Maresca got abuse for being just brilliant lmao. Stop being entitled, let’s get back to supporting 

Can't work out if you're on the wind up here tbh?

 

How is wanting the club to be run properly being entitled? We're 3-0 down at home to Wolves with Danny Ward in net, should we be happy with that?

 

We're crap and have been run poorly for years, occasionally getting the odd good manager to paper over the cracks. What signings have been good in the past 7/8 years? Even a few of the best ones have been let go on a free and we've got zero ££ for them.

Posted
Just now, ian__marshall said:

Suspect it's out of our hands. Likely Brighton have asked him not to play, though it does raise a question as to why he is on the bench. 

You’ve answered your own question. If we’d agreed not to play him he wouldn’t be on the bench, so clearly that hasn’t happened. What we’re seeing is an insight into RVN’s approach - and it is deeply disturbing.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

You lot?! I loved Maresca and was gutted when he left.

 

And it’s clear from your response that you have absolutely no idea why you apparently think RVN would be ‘perfect’ for us if we went down. Which makes your response as stupid as it is sad. 

Clarity seems to be your problem, Maresca was perfect which you agree. What i don’t understand is why when Ruud has I shit team with injuries you should question him? Tell me that 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Aus Fox said:

The worst thing being 3-0 down to these is they are also ****ing awful.

But they’re much better than us, how many of our players get in their 11? 2 at most?

  • Haha 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

I honestly don't think it's an exaggeration to say there's a greater than 50% chance it'd be 0 - 0 with Mads in goal. 

The baffling part is how Stolarczyk and Iversen have both proven to be decent stand-ins yet Danny ****ing Ward is still somehow selected over them. It stinks and beggars belief.

Posted
1 minute ago, ian__marshall said:

Suspect it's out of our hands. Likely Brighton have asked him not to play, though it does raise a question as to why he is on the bench. 

Last point means that theory cannot be correct, it the simplest explanation as usual - RvN is a poor excuse for a manager with NO idea!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...