Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’d rather get relegated definitely by a hefty points deduction, than get relegated by 1 or 2 points because of dubious team selection….

Posted
35 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

Chelsea if I were to bet. I just don't think its us.

think theyve got around it by flogging hotels to themselves,

though im sure other teams like Villa, Newcastle, Forest, Everton have got to be close too

like Utd surely should be too, but i suppose top 6 teams dont apply with this shit

  • Like 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

... it can't be us?

 

We’ve avoided the charge for 22/23 already, 23/24 we were in a different league and it's not possible to breach this year whilst it's ongoing? 

 

It has to be a club that were in the Prem last year. 

 

Don't get me wrong, the EFL can **** us if we go down and the Prem can **** us next year if we stay up and have breached. 

 

But the Prem can't do us this year, can they, not on the basis of what we've just submitted? That doesn't make any sense. If they do us this year it's because they've revisited the 22/23 issue through some sort of appeal but then why would that be happening now whilst they're busy with these recent submissions? 

 

Doesn't make any sense unless I'm missing something obvious? 

 

They can’t do anything about 22/23, we won that case and that issue is now closed.

 

What they might try and do is get us for 23/24 for the same reason we escaped 22/23 over the ‘golden share’ as we were a Premier League club for the last 2 weeks. 
Which might actually bring the absurd situation that the EFL also try to go after us for the same season. 
 

They can’t go after us for this season as it’s still ongoing.

 

Having said all that - who knows? They’ve proven how utterly demented and desperate to punish us regardless of if we’ve done anything wrong. 
 

We ought to file a restraining order against them. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Bilo said:

Past caring to be honest.

 

We're as good as down anyway.

The thing is that if we have breached again then we as fans have to ensure that Top, Rudkin and Whelan all leave their roles.

 

Top has to sell anyway but there has to be mass protests if they've been found to have breached these rules.

 

They're not owners, they're custodians. There will be LCFC once they've gone. We as fans need to do our bit to ensure they don't totally destroy too much.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, FrankieADZ said:

think theyve got around it by flogging hotels to themselves,

though im sure other teams like Villa, Newcastle, Forest, Everton have got to be close too

like Utd surely should be too, but i suppose top 6 teams dont apply with this shit

 

Let's be honest the big six are bullet proof. 

 

Even Man City won't get anywhere near the thrashing people hope is coming for them. 

 

Man City will have a shit year, finish outside the Champions League places anyway and probably get a pointless points deduction to make them finish mid table. 

 

Then without the distraction of Europe they'll piss a domestic treble next year for lols 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

The thing is that if we have breached again then we as fans have to ensure that Top, Rudkin and Whelan all leave their roles.

 

Top has to sell anyway but there has to be mass protests if they've been found to have breached these rules.

 

They're not owners, they're custodians. There will be LCFC once they've gone. We as fans need to do our bit to ensure they don't totally destroy too much.

Good luck getting our lot to do that, we won the league once so it’s all fine. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

we as fans have to ensure that Top, Rudkin and Whelan all leave their roles.

 

How? 

 

Mass boycotts will never, ever happen at this club. You'd be delusional to believe otherwise. 

 

That's pretty much the only way we could force an owner out. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Wymsey said:

Reckon Forest.

Something doesn't seem right with them under their owner..

Nah it won’t be them.

 

Theyve got away with it with the transfer cheating of the Greek goalkeeper, Niakhate and Mangala

Posted
12 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

How? 

 

Mass boycotts will never, ever happen at this club. You'd be delusional to believe otherwise. 

 

That's pretty much the only way we could force an owner out. 

 

About 20% of our fan base would want to know when any protest starts so they  can go beat the traffic. 

 

Long term beneficial change for the club they love? Or get home and snuggled up for Strictly? ....it isn't even a contest 

 

 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

Nah it won’t be them.

 

Theyve got away with it with the transfer cheating of the Greek goalkeeper, Niakhate and Mangala

Marinakis will threaten to have them shot 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

Ah **** it.

 

Let it be us. We're LCFC. We do ****ing headlines. They can't always be good. 

 

If you want boring go follow Cov, they never do anything of note. If you want interesting, you support Leicester ****ing City.

 

 

  Hide contents

Unless it's between 3pm and 5pm on a Saturday afternoon then it's actually often quite boring to be honest but you can't have everything.

 

 

Agreed.

 

We should also get a shed load of booze and cocktail of drugs in the players and send them out to La Manga in full kit.

 

If we're going to fu ck this up, we might as well do it properly.

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Vowels said:

Agreed.

 

We should also get a shed load of booze and cocktail of drugs in the players and send them out to La Manga in full kit.

 

If we're going to fu ck this up, we might as well do it properly.

 

 

Rather send them to Thailand with Tom Hopper tbf

Posted
1 hour ago, Ric Flair said:

Just waiting for the article that we are hamstrung and cannot make any signings as a result. It's surely coming.

I reckon the PL are briefing journalists to that effect.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

Ah **** it.

 

Let it be us. We're LCFC. We do ****ing headlines. They can't always be good. 

 

If you want boring go follow Cov, they never do anything of note. If you want interesting, you support Leicester ****ing City.

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

Unless it's between 3pm and 5pm on a Saturday afternoon then it's actually often quite boring to be honest but you can't have everything.

 

 

A record points deduction - you'll never sing that

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Craig said:

Rather send them to Thailand with Tom Hopper tbf

 

I'm sure the players can find some women to 'take it up the Tom Hopper' in La Manga. Especially with the kind of confidence, charm and appeal that comes with being completely b0ll0x3d.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...