Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, st albans fox said:

There’s no criteria on an obligation …….

its an obligation 

if it’s an obligation based on criteria being met then it’s an option that becomes an obligation 

They are the obligated if promoted and not obligated if they aren’t. Not sure what people are arguing here. 
 

They would have no option, the contract would stipulate if they go up they must buy him. Hence an obligation 
 

Obligation just means legally bound to do something. There could be any number of stipulations in a legally binding contract. 

Edited by Babylon
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, SecretPro said:

What do we need a replacement for? He shouldn't be anywhere near the first team this season? 

But he is isn’t he though. Having already lost one winger to injury, another injury and he’s going to be involved more than he already has been. 

Posted
1 hour ago, ACF said:


Not sure you know what an obligation means fella!

Obligation: Morally or legally bound to do something… They would be legally bound to purchase them if promoted at that price. It’s the very definition of an obligation 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Babylon said:

But he is isn’t he though. Having already lost one winger to injury, another injury and he’s going to be involved more than he already has been. 

 

7 minutes ago, Babylon said:

Obligation: Morally or legally bound to do something… They would be legally bound to purchase them if promoted at that price. It’s the very definition of an obligation 

You know no more than anyone else does 

There’s no deal agreed so we wont find out 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Babylon said:

Kasey has played 16 games this year in some capacity. So that would suggest we do need him; even if it’s just as back up. 
 

It’s not even an obligation either, it’s based on promotion apparently. So we could weaken ourselves and get nothing. 
 

We also are hardly blessed with options at full back. We’re an injury away from either of them needing to play more than we’d probably want them to be. 

And I've used a knackered, old Srixon Soft Feel for my last few rounds of golf, but if someone offered me a tenner for it, I'd gnaw their arm off.

 

We don't need anybody, least of all somebody as devoid of quality as Kasey McAteer. 

Edited by Nods
  • Like 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, Babylon said:

Obligation: Morally or legally bound to do something… They would be legally bound to purchase them if promoted at that price. It’s the very definition of an obligation 

Was unaware it was a promotion based obligation - I hadn’t read that.

Posted
3 hours ago, SecretPro said:

What do we need a replacement for? He shouldn't be anywhere near the first team this season? 

Because the guy wants to argue with people for the sake of it. Everyone's tired of him being contrarian.🤣

  • Like 1
Posted

For christ's sake just take any offer for the likes of Mcateer, Thomas, Choudary & plenty of others. Just get rid of them, they are terrible players & any money is a bonus. They are all Division 1 at best

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Surely the fact we’ve rejected this, tells its own story? 
 

He’s needed here. 
 

He’s okay in the Championship. Some will disagree. He’s not going to set the world alight but he’s got fight. Similar to Choudhury, in that he cares but ability just isn’t at the level we aspire to be at. 

Posted

Transfer team were probably home with their feet up when this one came in - only reason I can think that we rejected that is they couldn't be ****ed to head back into the office

Posted
15 minutes ago, ACF said:

Was unaware it was a promotion based obligation - I hadn’t read that.

There’s no evidence that it was

there’s more evidence that it isn’t - as in it wasn’t mentioned by ornstein.  an obligation based on meeting criteria isn’t an obligation is it !

Posted
1 minute ago, st albans fox said:

an obligation based on meeting criteria isn’t an obligation is it !

They are very common. Both Fatawu and Akgun were criteria driven obligations last season. Fatawu's was triggered (promotion), Akgun's wasn't (appearances).

  • Like 1
Posted

He missed most of last season due to injury and the glimpses weve seen of him this year aint exactly set the world alight. I don't think he makes any difference to the team if hes there or not. Premier League is not his level at present. I'd rather have Sunderlands jobe bellingham.

Posted
8 hours ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

They are very common. Both Fatawu and Akgun were criteria driven obligations last season. Fatawu's was triggered (promotion), Akgun's wasn't (appearances).

Yes I know that they’re common but people are assuming that this deal was like that and we have no evidence whatsoever that this is the case 

I’ve seen plenty of deals like this described as ‘option to buy which becomes an obligation on promotion or no of games played’.  Usually if it’s loan with straight obligation (which is more than possible here as that’s all we’ve had via ornstein) then that means the buying club want to stick the fee into their next financial year.   That’s perhaps what made us reject. 

Posted
On 03/02/2025 at 22:02, Babylon said:

Obligation: Morally or legally bound to do something… They would be legally bound to purchase them if promoted at that price. It’s the very definition of an obligation 

What if he didn't agree his terms?

Posted

He's great and getting into amazing positions which sometimes is half the battle but doesn't have the ability to take advantage of it where as cannon has lots of ability but doesn't get into great positions. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...