Premier League has charged LCFC with an alleged breach of PSR

[lcfc_forever]

5 minutes ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

Source? 

If they could retrospectively apply it, they would have done it for 22-23 as well don't you think? 

Edited 20 May 2025 by lcfc_forever

[HankMarvin]

2 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

The club will decry we are being punished for trying to compete, when in truth we are being punished because we are a shambles and have become accustomed to paying over the top in fees and wages to bang average players

Even players like Cody in the Champ expensive luxuries like the club can afford to pay second fiddle players that are on higher wages than 98% of the league 

Edited 20 May 2025 by HankMarvin

[ClaphamFox]

6 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Why wouldn't he?! 

Because he won't get a better job and his best chance of restoring his reputation will be to turn things around with us. He will stay unless the club sacks him, which seems much less likely now given: a) the cost of doing so; and b) the difficulty of recruiting a quality replacement with another PSR charge over our heads.

Edited 20 May 2025 by ClaphamFox

[RonnieTodger]

Thank god we avoided that points deduction. We might have gone down!

Edited 20 May 2025 by RonnieTodger

[Tomo260]

So bored of the PSR issues and rumours, not gonna even follow it, just take it as it comes now

[richardsfoxes]

Im so sick of this every season.

[Vindaloo FOX]

Its the end, bet we get relegated next season.

[when_you're_smiling]

To be fair, we have ruined football with all our spending.

[Pita]

The so call business brains at the club are useless need a mass clear out at the top of the club. 

[Libertine]

23 minutes ago, filbertway said:

ChatGPT have me covered as well thanks

 

"Important money papers". The level of vocabulary our board operates at. 

[Happy Fox]

We need new ownership, even if the new owners have less funds we desperately need competence.

[VLC86]

When you think about it, it’s actually pretty funny in a sadistic way.

 

We made them change the rules thinking we could stay up this season, but it’s the rule change that actually means they can get us for last season meaning we will actually be further away from being a stable premier league club 😂 

[Bert]

14 minutes ago, Craig said:

Completely deserved.

 

As restrictive as PSR is, there is no agenda or conspiracy in us being charged. 
 

The club knew the rules and were either negligent in adhering to them, or thought they were somehow above them.

 

Hopefully we can escape with a 15 point deduction this season so we end on less than Derby's record. No less than they all deserve. 
 

It really could **** us up for next season though, and I expect that to be the case. 

There’s no chance of us being docked for this season. They’ll make sure it’s after the season is done and get us at the start of next. 

[Hollism]

4 minutes ago, Lako42 said:

Why does Whelan, who is head of commercial, get away with zero flak from the fans? 

 

 

 

She doesn't?

 

Rudkin gets more because it's widely accepted (although none of us know) that he's in charge of football finances, player contracts, recruiting the manager. Whereas Susan's job is likely to be maximising revenue from the sponsorships, corporate hospitality and retail on a global scale.

 

If it feels like she gets away with zero flak, it's because the fact we're sponsored by a bankrupt crypto gambling company is barely in the top 10 biggest farces of the past few years at KPFC.

[AjcW]

1 minute ago, VLC86 said:

When you think about it, it’s actually pretty funny in a sadistic way.

 

We made them change the rules thinking we could stay up this season, but it’s the rule change that actually means they can get us for last season meaning we will actually be further away from being a stable premier league club 😂 

Not to mention us changing the accounting period, which now means we probably can’t sack our manager until after pre season starts….

[LFEFox23]

When will this rollercoaster stop!!

 

Bet a decision/outcome wont be until Christmas time.

[teblin]

Might also push us in the direction of Dyche as he has experienced it before. Also might mean he isn’t keen.

 

That or we stick with Ruud.

[StevieH]

Think we will be stuck with RvN next season. Can't see any decent manager taking the reigns in the mess that we are in.

[The Year Of The Fox]

How are the Facebook groups responding? I think I’m banned on them all 

[Bert]

Is there a potential for a deduction and a transfer embargo? 

[HitchinFox]

I'm already looking at League One grounds to visit in 2026-27.

 

 

[Mickyblueeyes]

We have morons in our fan base who are constantly talking about “be careful what you wish for” “Rudkin in” “safe pair of hands”

 

we are the only club in constant breach of PSR regulation. Put aside the restrictions of these rules, focus on our inability to manoeuvre around them like every single one of our competitors, it shows mismanagement,

 

So if you’re a “be careful what you wish for” “Top is great, I hope he shags my wife” “Rudkin in”, “don’t protest” wankstain. Explain why it’s us again. Because the club sure won’t.

[SemperEadem]

1 minute ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

How are the Facebook groups responding? I think I’m banned on them all 

Blaming UFS

[VLC86]

3 minutes ago, AjcW said:

Not to mention us changing the accounting period, which now means we probably can’t sack our manager until after pre season starts….

We won’t really be able to sack him, his compensation will add to the failure of PSR for next season.

[ClaphamFox]

This is from Sky Sports: "The fans will be relieved to hear that they will face definitely no punishment for the 2022-23 season, but they're facing three charges for alleged breaches in the 2023-24 season."

So our previous fear (that the EFL could get us for 2022/23) was unfounded   But we've got three brand new charges for 2023/24