If vardy doesn’t get a new club?

[Claridge]

Would we want him back?

[Ryy]

No

[em9999]

If he can't get a new club he should retire he's been a legend and deserves his rest 👏 

[Collymore]

6 minutes ago, Ryy said:

No

He doesn't deserve a flippant answer like that. 

[AyewJoking]

i wouldnt be surprised to see him back training at Seagrave but I dont think he will wear the shirt again (in a competitive game)

[Scoop Dog]

I can't see him coming back but would take him in a heart beat 

[Dahnsouff]

13 minutes ago, Collymore said:

He doesn't deserve a flippant answer like that. 

He may not, but the question is deserving of it for sure.

Edited 18 July 2025 by Dahnsouff

[jammie82uk]

8 minutes ago, Royston. said:

i wouldnt be surprised to see him back training at Seagrave

He has been doing that with a private company 

[Guest]

No. There are presumably good reasons why he's not signed a new deal - maybe wages, maybe at 38 he just doesn't fancy another slog through the Championship, maybe he wants a break or a change of scenery, maybe other things, who knows.

 

He could probably still contribute but I would rather see us try to move on with someone younger and more dynamic, someone better able to get about the pitch and more consistently impose themselves on the game in and out of possession. I also think it will be easier both for a new manager to stamp their authority on the squad and for any new striker to establish themselves without him here, though naturally there will be comparisons and expectations to deal with.

[adejo92]

No one can or will dispute what he's done for the club but absolutely would not want him back.

 

Even if he was to half his wages - Which he wouldn't - It would still be too much for his output.

 

It was like playing with 10 men most of last season.

 

I am sure he's got offers and plans anyway, despite little being published.

[MS0204]

Said bye to him twice now.. can’t do it a third time 

[kenny]

Get him in.

[whoareyaaa]

No, we need to move on.

 

 

[Pliskin]

Tesco are recruiting?

[coolhandfox]

No!

 

 

[Groby_Blue]

It would be like that girl who you adored when you were younger but then you both moved on and things didn't work out so you go back hoping to rekindle what you once had, but it's never the same and you both end up disappointed. 

 

He had the perfect send off, 200 goals dead on 500 games on the anniversary of when he first signed for us. That was perfect. Let's leave it at that. 

[ceebeefox]

In a heartbeat.

[rugbyblue]

3 minutes ago, Groby_Blue said:

It would be like that girl who you adored when you were younger but then you both moved on and things didn't work out so you go back hoping to rekindle what you once had, but it's never the same and you both end up disappointed. 

 

He had the perfect send off, 200 goals dead on 500 games on the anniversary of when he first signed for us. That was perfect. Let's leave it at that. 

Disappointed, but you still go back for the odd roll after a few drinks now and again 😂

 

But yes, its never the same.  

[Sly]

We need to move on at some point. 

[Ryy]

41 minutes ago, Collymore said:

He doesn't deserve a flippant answer like that. 

My bad I’ll redo it

No.

[Lambert09]

I really don’t want him to go to birmingham. The fact he knows Davies makes that rumour ring a little too true for my liking 

[Tuna]

Yes, absolutely.

[Dahnsouff]

Lofe how people moan about our finances but are quite happy to proliferate the problem for something that would give no future reward 

[Pita]

We’ve got to move on from him. He’s left the and I wish him well. If I was him I would get the biggest deal I could 

[Jattdogg]

I think emotionally, we all would take him back without a doubt.

 

I am torn as he could probably help us but at the same time we really do need to move on and give someone else a go. He will always be one of the biggest legends at our club.

 

If he doesn't find a club and signs on a free by X date (on the cheap wages wise) then I won't be upset about it.

 

 

Edited 18 July 2025 by Jattdogg