Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, tinpot_fox said:

 

 

Could be more than 1 club who really want him at the end of his World Cup, so might not go for an absolute pittance. If it wasn’t for the World Cup then i’d predict he would leave us in the January window for a half decent fee, if we keep Seagrave and he wanted somewhere nice to ease back into a hopefully a good few more years as a player. 
 

I'm loving the amount times Leicester city has been mentioned in the coverage so far in this match (watching on In Demand)

any interested clubs will negotiate with his agent, not us.

we will be told the fee by the buying club

thats where we are as a league 1 club thats broke - as someone once said ‘you don’t have any cards’. 


harry (and his agent) will get any uplift on his fee as part of his package 

At the very best we will get his amortised value. (Approx 5m) 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, Long Eaton Fox said:

unless we really are more skint that I thought

We are more skint that you thought..

 

With bills of between 55m-70m looming and projected incomings of around 14m, I'd say that is the purest definition of skint you will ever find..

Posted
54 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

We are more skint that you thought..

 

With bills of between 55m-70m looming and projected incomings of around 14m, I'd say that is the purest definition of skint you will ever find..

All down to the way Rudkin has run the club. Letting players go for free ,over paying wages the wrong managers and very poor players 

  • Like 2
Posted

He has to be sold out of necessity (due to Top and Rudkin) but will join a side far better than what those two assemble. Says it all about the calibre of those two.

Posted
4 hours ago, Paninistickers said:

We are more skint that you thought..

 

With bills of between 55m-70m looming and projected incomings of around 14m, I'd say that is the purest definition of skint you will ever find..

Not with a dozy billionaire owner who will just convert debt into equity again:ph34r:

Posted

Although looking at his injury record may make it look high risk I could see several promotion chasing Championship clubs or even one of the promoted Premier League sides taking a punt on him, it’s a gamble but for what he can bring it’s very good value. Hope we can keep him though, not just his ability but his application in that Millwall game was night and day over the assortment of muppets we’d seen all season.

Posted
6 hours ago, Paninistickers said:

We are more skint that you thought..

 

With bills of between 55m-70m looming and projected incomings of around 14m, I'd say that is the purest definition of skint you will ever find..

It was reported that the second year, parachute payments had not been utilised at the time of writing the other month

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...