Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He’s desperate to be back at SU and hes frustrated not to have it tied up already.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, GLC said:

He’s desperate to be back at SU and hes frustrated not to have it tied up already.

This I can very much believe - heard very similar myself 

Posted
8 minutes ago, GLC said:

He’s desperate to be back at SU and hes frustrated not to have it tied up already.

Lets hope we do it before he inevitably gets injured.

  • Like 2
Posted

Faes and Okoli for Notts County at this rate. Need to recruit, now, and fast.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Tuna said:

Faes and Okoli for Notts County at this rate. Need to recruit, now, and fast.

Oh my god that’s horrific 

Edited by Groby Fox 13
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Tuna said:

Faes and Okoli for Notts County at this rate. Need to recruit, now, and fast.

I reckon Souttar will start against Notts County

 

 

 

 

 

 

👀 but which

Edited by FoxinNotts
Posted
21 minutes ago, GLC said:

He’s desperate to be back at SU and hes frustrated not to have it tied up already.

If he wants to go there then we need to make sure we get the money up front, don't trust Sheff Utd not to pay it. 

 

Also, he needs to be frustrated at Sheffield as they have being messing around. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, fox_favourite said:

If he wants to go there then we need to make sure we get the money up front, don't trust Sheff Utd not to pay it. 

 

Also, he needs to be frustrated at Sheffield as they have being messing around. 

What does that mean ?

 

football clubs have to pay football debts 

 

and we’d factor the payments from the bank anyway to get our hands on the cash 

  • Like 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

What does that mean ?

 

football clubs have to pay football debts 

 

and we’d factor the payments from the bank anyway to get our hands on the cash 

People getting confused between transfer fees and how they are paid. Not many are cash upfront and all normally paid over time. So when a journalist said that a club owes 40 million on transfer fees,  a lot of people presume this is clubs withholding payment rather than it being part of the agreed payment plan.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

What does that mean ?

 

football clubs have to pay football debts 

 

and we’d factor the payments from the bank anyway to get our hands on the cash 

Aren't they in trouble for not paying transfer fees? 

Posted
3 hours ago, st albans fox said:

He and okoli looked like they were protecting themselves yesterday 

 

wouldn’t be surprised to have neither here come end August 

It was basically a friendly match yesterday. The real stuff starts this saturday

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, fox_favourite said:

Aren't they in trouble for not paying transfer fees? 

Previous owner - yes 

but all ‘football debts’ have to be paid -  eventually 

 

the old owner claims he’s still owed £35m - has employed de marco.  Perhaps they won’t be able to go through with any buys. 

Edited by st albans fox
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, PlymouthFox said:

Chris Wilder has just said in his post match interview on sky that they are making no more permanent buys this window. Loans only.

Then on BBC interview said they’ve put in a bid for a player. Souttar will go there this week and we will have Faes waving his arms around for the first few games until he gets a loan to Belgium on deadline day 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, fox_favourite said:

If he wants to go there then we need to make sure we get the money up front, don't trust Sheff Utd not to pay it. 

 

Also, he needs to be frustrated at Sheffield as they have being messing around. 

Wasn't it rumoured they wanted to offload one of their useless centre-backs as part of the package?

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

Wasn't it rumoured they wanted to offload one of their useless centre-backs as part of the package?

No package mentioned, but Wilder said Mark Maguiness was 'not in their plans' for this season 

 

Big lump of a CB. Irish international.

started for them today, and scored

Edited by FoxinNotts
Posted

2 years left of a £15m 5.5 year deal, you’d assume he’s not hit any milestones for additional payments as he’s barely played and we’ve been an utter embarrassment since he’s been here, so if we could get around £8m there could be a small book value profit. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

No package mentioned, but Wilder said Mark Maguiness was 'not in their plans' for this season 

 

Big lump of a CB. Irish international.

started for them today, and scored

Crap on the ball RM isn't going to want him.

Posted

While there’s been positives to the ins and outs this summer, the fact we’re likely needing to recruit two first team centre backs just before or after the opening league game I’m afraid is not great. I appreciate the amount of activity behind clearing the swamp, but am I alone in thinking this is pretty negligent?

  • Like 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Wasyls Pec Deck said:

While there’s been positives to the ins and outs this summer, the fact we’re likely needing to recruit two first team centre backs just before or after the opening league game I’m afraid is not great. I appreciate the amount of activity behind clearing the swamp, but am I alone in thinking this is pretty negligent?

Absolutely it's negligent 

 

as is the lack of a number 9

 

there are no more chances it's this season or bust for Leicester City 

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Wasyls Pec Deck said:

While there’s been positives to the ins and outs this summer, the fact we’re likely needing to recruit two first team centre backs just before or after the opening league game I’m afraid is not great. I appreciate the amount of activity behind clearing the swamp, but am I alone in thinking this is pretty negligent?

Wholeheartedly agree and they've (CBs and a 9) been problems for years, not just this window. It is just absolute incompetence at this point. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Bob Weasel Fox said:

Absolutely it's negligent 

 

as is the lack of a number 9

 

there are no more chances it's this season or bust for Leicester City 

Would probably say the lack of centre forward is the bigger unforgivable failure. Would imagine they’ve been trying to move Okoli and Faes on with no takers, and other teams know how ****ed we are so lowballing on Nelson and Souttar. Aluko, Gray and even Wilson-Brown in the squad at start of pre season so it’s understandable if completely inept. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...