Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

We’re still paying instalments for some players. 

 

Pretty sure it’s detailed in the brochure at £190m….. as stated by OPA could be wrong but I’m sure that’s what he said. 

Probably owe about £20m at this stage???

Hardly a huge debt.

  • Like 1
Posted

Seagrave needs to be kept if said owners have any ambitions to be PL again but a lot of it needs mothballing and given minimum maintenance (golf course / some of the pitches) or shut down (swimming pool, bedrooms). Consider playing the women there (not sure of the rules). Shut the kitchen and have caterers.

 

I'm sure with some radical thinking costs can be made.

  • Haha 1
Posted

I’d guess every month at the moment we’re loosing money and the player sales are just prolonging the inevitable point when we’re in administration. 
I still stick to what I said a few months ago that by Christmas we will be in administration if we haven’t been sold. 

Posted
1 hour ago, davieG said:

Seagrave needs to be kept if said owners have any ambitions to be PL again but a lot of it needs mothballing and given minimum maintenance (golf course / some of the pitches) or shut down (swimming pool, bedrooms). Consider playing the women there (not sure of the rules). Shut the kitchen and have caterers.

 

I'm sure with some radical thinking costs can be made.

Training ground share with Notts Forrest. 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, damolcfc said:

Training ground share with Notts Forrest. 

 

Why would they want to share a training ground with us when they extensively renovated their own just a couple of years ago?

  • Haha 1
Posted

Whilst i'm no fan of rugby, is there not something in utilising these unvelievable facilities across the football and rugby teams, as well as Loughborough University being the best in it's class for sport and so utilising it and getting associated funding. 

 

Buy Leicester, buy Tigers and take advantage of the available facilities. Don't ever do a ground share.

Posted
3 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Whilst i'm no fan of rugby, is there not something in utilising these unvelievable facilities across the football and rugby teams, as well as Loughborough University being the best in it's class for sport and so utilising it and getting associated funding. 

 

Buy Leicester, buy Tigers and take advantage of the available facilities. Don't ever do a ground share.

Bristol "sport" seem to have this model, Football, Rugby and Basketball under one umbrella. Funnily enough we're another city perfectly set up for that model

  • Like 2
Posted

Ted Boehly Sleeping partner, got board trying to work out who was playing that day, so many to choose from.

 

No photo description available.

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, hackneyfox said:

Probably owe about £20m at this stage???

Hardly a huge debt.

There are many problems with the current ownership. Largely being shit at running a football club. But the debt argument is completely over blown. There isn't much.

Edited by CL Fox
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Whilst i'm no fan of rugby, is there not something in utilising these unvelievable facilities across the football and rugby teams, as well as Loughborough University being the best in it's class for sport and so utilising it and getting associated funding. 

 

Buy Leicester, buy Tigers and take advantage of the available facilities. Don't ever do a ground share.

Good idea, annoyed i didnt think of this one 😁

 

Should definitely do a ground share though. Mental you have two stadiums within a mile that cant be used at the same time.

Edited by CL Fox
Posted
4 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Whilst i'm no fan of rugby, is there not something in utilising these unvelievable facilities across the football and rugby teams, as well as Loughborough University being the best in it's class for sport and so utilising it and getting associated funding. 

 

Buy Leicester, buy Tigers and take advantage of the available facilities. Don't ever do a ground share.

Would be great but likely only by a locally led consortium.

 

The Next/Dunelm/Bloor/Mattioli alliance 

Posted
1 minute ago, LVFox said:

Would be great but likely only by a locally led consortium.

 

The Next/Dunelm/Bloor/Mattioli alliance 

Annoyingly Breedon probably could be an option but their exec chairman is now involved in Liverpool (ex QPR).

 

https://www.breedongroup.com/who-we-are/corporate-governance/board-of-directors

 

They tried the tigers stuff 20 years ago but tigers didnt want to as they thought they were a bigger club. Rugby is skint now and things have moved on a bit so who knows.

Posted
5 hours ago, grth2004 said:

I’d guess every month at the moment we’re loosing money and the player sales are just prolonging the inevitable point when we’re in administration. 
I still stick to what I said a few months ago that by Christmas we will be in administration if we haven’t been sold. 

I agree. The club is probably surviving at the moment on the season ticket money, but this won't last long with our wage bill.

We have massive outgoings & our income must be really low - TV money is crap, hospitality has fallen off a cliff, matchday ticket sales & other revenues down etc.

We must be losing a massive amount weekly & unless probably 9 high earnings players leave before the end of the month, I think we are in an even bigger mess than we think

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Angus Scott said:

I agree. The club is probably surviving at the moment on the season ticket money, but this won't last long with our wage bill.

We have massive outgoings & our income must be really low - TV money is crap, hospitality has fallen off a cliff, matchday ticket sales & other revenues down etc.

We must be losing a massive amount weekly & unless probably 9 high earnings players leave before the end of the month, I think we are in an even bigger mess than we think

Club is surviving at the moment because king power have been footing the bill. I think they've lost the ability to do that. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Grebfromgrebland said:

Yes we do. NHS use some of them.

Yes we own and make some revenue from non Matchday use. The land currently has low value as no other use permitted.

  • Like 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, CL Fox said:

There are many problems with the current ownership. Largely being shit at running a football club. But the debt argument is completely over blown. There isn't much.

As always King Power seem a little shady with their dealings ... and it's time to come clean so the club is sold quickly

Posted
59 minutes ago, CL Fox said:

Good idea, annoyed i didnt think of this one 😁

 

Should definitely do a ground share though. Mental you have two stadiums within a mile that cant be used at the same time.

I've got a mate who suggested this to me. Said he'd overheard some lad on a dog walk arguing with his Dad about the idea. Had 3 schnauzers between them.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 17/08/2026 at 11:50, Sly said:

I’d imagine the time is quite quick if King Power need funding and also to potentially save some face to the outside world.

 

Could see this all being in place by December, with the Football Association taking another 6 months to approve etc.

 

If that is the case, we’ll see no  January / winter transfer spend, contract renewals etc, so we could just be spinning the wheels. It could be a pretty bleak season. 

No new signings helps us immensely to get back on track, financials trumps pitch performance at the moment.  Its baffling we still have a lot of people wanting us to spend, get new players etc.
Given our new signings are still of low standard, we want as little inbound signings as possible now under this ownership.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...