Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

You'd be gutted if your pitch was "I'm pro common sense" and then everyone on the forum disagreed with you.

Not if you only post on here to tease the morons ;)

Posted
3 hours ago, Golden Fox said:

Actually, I've agreed with pretty much every word he has said.

 

He made a sensible post which actually said nothing positive about Rudkin, and suddenly got called "Pro Rudkin".

 

Ths thread is probably a good example of a mob mentality, but it is a lot of the usual suspects seeing the "Pro Rudkin" comment and piling in as they suddenly have a target to get their personal digs in.

 

Similarly, just because you type that everyone on the forum disagrees with him, it doesn't make it true. Just that there seems little point in making balanced posts in this thread at the moment.

Thank you - as i said, i've only responded to posters who have something useful to add, and who actually take the time to read and understand the point i'm making (even if they don't necessarily agree with it).

 

FT is 95% morons, I took a break, but it feels like there's enough common sense here now to maintain a sensible discussion (even if one has to stepping stone over the mob).

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

People can disagree with the common position of course. But to claim you're the one with common sense is to claim you're in the majority.

I never said i was the 'only' one with common sense.  I simply said that my comments weren't pro-rudkin but pro-common sense - ie i looked at the facts and made i sensible comment based on facts rather than prejudice or following the mob.  If this puts me in the minority, i have no problem with that - in fact, it's a relief and no great surprise.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Officer Doofy said:

Cool

 

 

Who or what do you think is to blame for the club going from winning the Prem to hitting the lowest point in it's history. I would like your opinion. 

As mentioned in many other places - there is no one thing, person or reason for what has happened. I've moved on, sorry, i've no intention of going over all the old stuff again.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Lillehamring said:

As mentioned in many other places - there is no one thing, person or reason for what has happened. I've moved on, sorry, i've no intention of going over all the old stuff again.

Thanks

 

Assume that's what the internal review said on it's opening and closing page. 

Posted
34 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Oh the old "it was a joke" pivot.

I assure you it's nothing of the kind.

The thing with this place is that it's possible to make a perfectly sensible post and have a good discussion, whilst at the same time knowing exactly what triggers the sheep and the bigots. 

 

I'm mean, it's so easy, it's not exactly satisfying - but there is a certain malicious joy to be taken watching all the poor boys jump to their keyboards to make the same old predictable attempts at reposts, at humour, at trying to show the forum heroes that they're in the club...  it's just a bonus that one can do it at the same time as making an actual genuine post.

 

It's a double headed sword, no pivot at all.  Look back, you'll see exactly how it works ;)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Lillehamring said:

I assure you it's nothing of the kind.

The thing with this place is that it's possible to make a perfectly sensible post and have a good discussion, whilst at the same time knowing exactly what triggers the sheep and the bigots. 

 

I'm mean, it's so easy, it's not exactly satisfying - but there is a certain malicious joy to be taken watching all the poor boys jump to their keyboards to make the same old predictable attempts at reposts, at humour, at trying to show the forum heroes that they're in the club...  it's just a bonus that one can do it at the same time as making an actual genuine post.

 

It's a double headed sword, no pivot at all.  Look back, you'll see exactly how it works ;)

Since when do swords have heads? 
It's ironic how you blow your own horn and behave as arrogantly as you do, yet you're as blunt and as subtle as a maul. 
 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Lillehamring said:

I assure you it's nothing of the kind.

The thing with this place is that it's possible to make a perfectly sensible post and have a good discussion, whilst at the same time knowing exactly what triggers the sheep and the bigots. 

 

I'm mean, it's so easy, it's not exactly satisfying - but there is a certain malicious joy to be taken watching all the poor boys jump to their keyboards to make the same old predictable attempts at reposts, at humour, at trying to show the forum heroes that they're in the club...  it's just a bonus that one can do it at the same time as making an actual genuine post.

 

It's a double headed sword, no pivot at all.  Look back, you'll see exactly how it works ;)

Quite funny you mention that as your engagement with this football club is solely through a screen and a keyboard 

Posted
4 hours ago, Lillehamring said:

I assure you it's nothing of the kind.

The thing with this place is that it's possible to make a perfectly sensible post and have a good discussion, whilst at the same time knowing exactly what triggers the sheep and the bigots. 

 

I'm mean, it's so easy, it's not exactly satisfying - but there is a certain malicious joy to be taken watching all the poor boys jump to their keyboards to make the same old predictable attempts at reposts, at humour, at trying to show the forum heroes that they're in the club...  it's just a bonus that one can do it at the same time as making an actual genuine post.

 

It's a double headed sword, no pivot at all.  Look back, you'll see exactly how it works ;)

Yeah, real 4D chess you've been playing here 

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Lillehamring said:

I assure you it's nothing of the kind.

The thing with this place is that it's possible to make a perfectly sensible post and have a good discussion, whilst at the same time knowing exactly what triggers the sheep and the bigots. 

 

I'm mean, it's so easy, it's not exactly satisfying - but there is a certain malicious joy to be taken watching all the poor boys jump to their keyboards to make the same old predictable attempts at reposts, at humour, at trying to show the forum heroes that they're in the club...  it's just a bonus that one can do it at the same time as making an actual genuine post.

 

It's a double headed sword, no pivot at all.  Look back, you'll see exactly how it works ;)

You probably think you’re winning in some competition that doesn’t actually exist, but the reality is that you’re just being a dickhead on a football forum. 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 27/08/2026 at 14:17, Leicesterpool said:

Lets say hypotheical you had 500 million knocking in your bank and decided to buy the club. In terms of running the club what would you do?

Probably go straight to the medical team and ask them what the fcxk is wrong with me?

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Lillehamring said:

As mentioned in many other places - there is no one thing, person or reason for what has happened. I've moved on, sorry, i've no intention of going over all the old stuff again.

it's an accumulation of errors sure, but the buck stops with the most senior person with responsibilities in the areas of failure, just as it would in any other business. Like regardless of whether it was Rudkin, Glover, Cooper... who picked out Skipp, Grandpa Ayew and Bob the Nob as signings, it doesn't really matter. Either he directly valued that trio at 30m and several million in wages, or he signed off on the work of people who did. If your subordinates (and as the most senior football person at the club, they're all subordinates to him or one of his reports) are constantly making mistakes which are catastrophic for the business as a whole, then you're responsible for that. That's why director and c-suite level people get paid absolutely eye watering sums, it's compensation in line with the level of responsibility they are expected to shoulder. Directly or indirectly, Rudkin is responsible for the catastrophic decline in the footballing operations

Edited by The Doctor
  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, shen said:

Since when do swords have heads? 
It's ironic how you blow your own horn and behave as arrogantly as you do, yet you're as blunt and as subtle as a maul. 
 

Yawn. A typo - that's the best you've got?

Posted
1 hour ago, Juan Carrito said:

Yeah, real 4D chess you've been playing here 

 

1 hour ago, Blarmy said:

You probably think you’re winning in some competition that doesn’t actually exist, but the reality is that you’re just being a dickhead on a football forum. 

I rest my case.  

Posted
49 minutes ago, Lillehamring said:

 

I rest my case.  

You have a case? I’ve not seen anything other than some kind of Mr Spock/internet troll mash-up. 
 

Whatever gets you through the day I guess. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Lillehamring said:

Yawn. A typo - that's the best you've got?

It's not even a typo, it's malaphor.

 

You're really having a bad day.  How embarrassing for a towering intellect like yourself to be constantly corrected by morons.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bluearmyfox28 said:

Another thread turned into Rudkin themed 😒

Cus the blokes a **** ,crap at his job and responsible  along with Top for our downfall ,its hard not to mention  the twat when picking faults at the minute. 

  • Like 1
Posted

So no one has bought the club yet?

 

It's amazing how many supposedly different threads have just become about who is to blame. It's almost as if resolving this question will somehow make a difference. If only we can point the finger at the right person/people, then everything will become better.

 

Don't play around with blame,

It does nothing for the pain.

It makes you twisted and unkind

And the right words hard to find.

 

Yeah.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Lillehamring said:

Thank you - as i said, i've only responded to posters who have something useful to add, and who actually take the time to read and understand the point i'm making (even if they don't necessarily agree with it).

 

FT is 95% morons, I took a break, but it feels like there's enough common sense here now to maintain a sensible discussion (even if one has to stepping stone over the mob).

A couple of things first so you can’t play victim.

 

Firstly, I haven’t weighed in on this debate at all. And second, I am a poster who does tend to take time to post more lengthy balanced posted rather than purely being reactive as I’m sure my history would show (not to say frustrations can’t prompt a reaction on certain occasions).

 

But you expect to post something like 95% on this forum are morons then whinge when people have a pop at you? It’s insulting, generalising people who you know nothing about, unnecessary and childish. If you were actually interested in matured, balanced conversation, you wouldn’t be making daft comments like this. 

Edited by LCFCJohn
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...