Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We generally seem to sanction these kinds of moves when we have something sorted, transfer-wise, so maybe there will be some activity on CB front soon. Otchere went out on loan when it was clear Bristric was coming in?

  • Like 1
Posted

Was he any good at Swindon? They collapsed last season. 

 

Interesting he's joined a league rival, a side going for promotion again, but it's not the first time this has happened.

Posted
Just now, Stadt said:

It should be inconceivable Wilson-Brown or Cartwright would finish above us but I'm starting to get uncomfortable 

Add Richards and silko Thomas to that nervous list too

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Fox92 said:

Was he any good at Swindon? They collapsed last season. 

 

Interesting he's joined a league rival, a side going for promotion again, but it's not the first time this has happened.

He was decent for them - I believe usually played left of a back 3

 

Really struggled with injuries and fitness though - missed more league games than he played and was actually taken off at half time in 5 of his 19 starts

  • Like 3
Posted

Do we know the fee, and for that matter do we know what we got for Richards/Cartwright? If we are getting a couple million for the three it’s not awful, especially if they aren’t seen as being good enough. Stockport are in our division and direct competitors but where we need to be in 5 years or even 2 is very different to them

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, LCFCCKEANO said:

Do we know the fee, and for that matter do we know what we got for Richards/Cartwright? If we are getting a couple million for the three it’s not awful, especially if they aren’t seen as being good enough. Stockport are in our division and direct competitors but where we need to be in 5 years or even 2 is very different to them

No way we are getting £2m for the three.

Thomas was a free agent so got nothing for him. Be lucky if we got £250k in total.

Edited by Ian S
  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, LCFCCKEANO said:

Do we know the fee, and for that matter do we know what we got for Richards/Cartwright? If we are getting a couple million for the three it’s not awful, especially if they aren’t seen as being good enough. Stockport are in our division and direct competitors but where we need to be in 5 years or even 2 is very different to them

All these undisclosed fees will just about cover a few weeks of interest payments to the Aussie bank. We'll soon have run out of assets to sell for undisclosed fees.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Dan said:

I thought this until Gray didn't come on for Nelson v Genoa. Made me think he's a way down the pecking order.

He is.

 

But TWB is seen as not needed and sellable. 

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted
41 minutes ago, LCFCCKEANO said:

Do we know the fee, and for that matter do we know what we got for Richards/Cartwright? If we are getting a couple million for the three it’s not awful, especially if they aren’t seen as being good enough. Stockport are in our division and direct competitors but where we need to be in 5 years or even 2 is very different to them

Stockport have spent 'big' but I think it shows how out of touch we are with anything below the championship. Absolutely no way we're getting anything close to a combined £2m for them. Would be absolutely staggered if we're getting £1m. Cartwright going to be the biggest and that's probably £250k-£500k (absolute max). Richards lucky to get 6 figures for and imagine Wilson-Brown would be £250k tops. Teams mainly rely on free transfers and loans. Signing a player for money is a bit of a luxury

Posted
1 hour ago, moore_94 said:

was actually taken off at half time in 5 of his 19 starts

That's a damning stat. 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Ian S said:

No way we are getting £2m for the three.

Thomas was a free agent so got nothing for him. Be lucky if we got £250k in total.

Amani Richards not Silko Thomas, think we got a fee for him? 

Posted
21 minutes ago, dmayne7 said:

Stockport have spent 'big' but I think it shows how out of touch we are with anything below the championship. Absolutely no way we're getting anything close to a combined £2m for them. Would be absolutely staggered if we're getting £1m. Cartwright going to be the biggest and that's probably £250k-£500k (absolute max). Richards lucky to get 6 figures for and imagine Wilson-Brown would be £250k tops. Teams mainly rely on free transfers and loans. Signing a player for money is a bit of a luxury

Would’ve thought a similar fee for TWB and Cartwright, Richards was probably menial. Couple of million was more just a turn of phrase, would imagine it is a lot closer to a million. I’m not really upset about those three being let go of as I think it is better practice than holding them and releasing as we tend to do, more pissed off with Page/Motsi/Monga deals, but it is where we are now

Posted
1 hour ago, Dan said:

With our centre half situation this just seems so short sighted again. Like Cartwright he'd be a fine squad option who wouldn't cost us much in wages.

Cartwright was bound to leave after scoring the goal that got Martin sacked. 😀

Posted
1 hour ago, indierich06 said:

We generally seem to sanction these kinds of moves when we have something sorted, transfer-wise, so maybe there will be some activity on CB front soon. Otchere went out on loan when it was clear Bristric was coming in?

Think you’re probably right- exact same with Vieites too. Reckon something breaks next 48 hours

Posted
38 minutes ago, dmayne7 said:

Stockport have spent 'big' but I think it shows how out of touch we are with anything below the championship. Absolutely no way we're getting anything close to a combined £2m for them. Would be absolutely staggered if we're getting £1m. Cartwright going to be the biggest and that's probably £250k-£500k (absolute max). Richards lucky to get 6 figures for and imagine Wilson-Brown would be £250k tops. Teams mainly rely on free transfers and loans. Signing a player for money is a bit of a luxury

Stockport did spend £2m last summer, including £1m on a defender who only played a handful of games for Norwich. It's probably the more backed clubs but I'm pretty sure Stockport, Blackpool, Peterborough and Huddersfield all spent at least £1m last summer (and that's not taking into account the relegated teams as Luton spent a fair bit). 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Stadt said:

It should be inconceivable Wilson-Brown or Cartwright would finish above us but I'm starting to get uncomfortable 

Cedric Kipre is two leagues above us lol

Edited by Sol thewall Bamba
  • Haha 4
Posted
2 hours ago, 1972 Fox said:

All these undisclosed fees will just about cover a few weeks of interest payments to the Aussie bank. We'll soon have run out of assets to sell for undisclosed fees.


This rubbish of “interest payments costing us £200k a week”

 

Yes, we’ve borrowed money, but we’ve borrowed it against money we were already receiving, and received less money than what we would have for the ability to use it now. It’s the difference between a credit card, and a cash advance.

 

We’re not literally paying a weekly bill and we’ve also not taken on bad debt, we’ve not put the stadium up as collateral. It’s a bad cycle to be in and the club should be rightfully held to account for it, but Top and King Power are clearly not putting cash in, and with our operating expenses, we needed cash flow. We are not repaying a loan. 
 

We did this with transfer incomings, when United agreed to pay us over X years, and we needed the cash to fund replacements. It’s not bad debt, it’s just a sign that the club needs the cash.

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, coolhandfox said:

Not sure the manager or club fancied him.

 

They could think Gray is a better long term prospect. 

 

Hate to say it but we might just need the cash and he’s simply seen as more expendable than others. We’re at a point where if selling him and loaning cover is cheaper we will do it. We’re treating the club for the short term… 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

Hate to say it but we might just need the cash and he’s simply seen as more expendable than others. We’re at a point where if selling him and loaning cover is cheaper we will do it. We’re treating the club for the short term… 

He will be worth less than 100k if we are lucky, and on low wages.

 

Not sure that fits. 

Edited by coolhandfox
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

He will be worth less than 100k if we are lucky, and on low wages.

 

Not sure that fits. 

Not sure mate but there’s a theme happening. Cant imagine we’ve suddenly assumed players like him and Cartwright aren’t good enough. Either the players are pushing or we are cash strapped and are taking what we can get. Cleaning the psr books for next season (if we manage promotion) could be part of making it seem more appealing for a sale.  $500k on a youth player would be the same as selling a purchased player for a few mill with the way the psr calculations work out 

Edited by Lambert09
Posted
1 minute ago, Lambert09 said:

Not sure mate but there’s a theme happening. Cant imagine we’ve suddenly assumed players like him and Cartwright aren’t good enough. Either the players are pushing or we are cash strapped and are taking what we can get. Cleaning the psr books for next season (if we manage promotion) could be part of making it seem more appealing for a sale.  $500k on a youth player would be the same as selling a purchased player for a few mill with the way the psr calculations work out 

I'm the opposite, don't think the club every saw them as long term prospects, Page and Evan both got 3 year contacts in the last 12 months.

 

Both Cartwright and TWB had 1 year extension triggered to allow us to sell at a profit rather than walk away for free.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

Not sure mate but there’s a theme happening. Cant imagine we’ve suddenly assumed players like him and Cartwright aren’t good enough. Either the players are pushing or we are cash strapped and are taking what we can get. Cleaning the psr books for next season (if we manage promotion) could be part of making it seem more appealing for a sale.  $500k on a youth player would be the same as selling a purchased player for a few mill with the way the psr calculations work out 

I’m not sure, I think it’s more that the club have been guilty in stockpiling academy players, I think circumstances have now dictated that we have to be ruthless and if a player is not deemed to be the required quality then we shift them on and

recoup a fee, rather than let them drift in u21’s. I don’t have an issue with this, as I have no doubt the coaching staff will have had an input based on preseason. 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...