Rincewind Posted 2 October 2012 Posted 2 October 2012 He was always single, liked being around children so obviously he was a sex offender. What more evidence do you need?
Webbo Posted 2 October 2012 Posted 2 October 2012 He was always single, liked being around children so obviously he was a sex offender. What more evidence do you need? I'll agree that accusations aren't proof but even so with the amount of people coming out of the woodwork don't you at least have a bit of doubt?
skinnydipper Posted 2 October 2012 Posted 2 October 2012 Yes and the little rapscallion ought to be beet with celery sticks !! Is that Cos he's partial to Little Gems ?
Guest MattP Posted 2 October 2012 Posted 2 October 2012 He was always single, liked being around children so obviously he was a sex offender. What more evidence do you need? Seriously though, how confident would you be now if he was alive of leaving your 13 year old daughter in his care?
MPH Posted 2 October 2012 Posted 2 October 2012 This is exactly how I am feeling, either this is some bizarre smear campaign, or there were a lot of people, who knew what he was doing, including journalists, and colleagues and they did fvck all about it, and are just as culpable for letting it happen. I hope all of these cowardly fvcks, (not the victims by the way, I can understand why they didn't do anything about it, or that in some cases were ignored) get asked publicly why the fvck they didn't say something and hope they understand they could have stopped, they didn't and they have the rape of young girls on their conscience. As for Jimmy, he was a creepy fvcker at the best of times, but this is disgusting, it is just such a shame that none of this came out when he was alive and he could have been stopped and made to answer for it. One of the girls being interviewed will alledge that just as it happened to her she went crying and complaining to her teacher who then told her it was absolutey disgusting that she would make up such false allegations... another girl went to the police who decided not to prosecute as they felt they didnt have enough evidence...
Guest Posted 2 October 2012 Posted 2 October 2012 If it was happening then Esther rantzen , gambacinni and the others who knew should be brought to a reckoning.
21st Century Fox Posted 2 October 2012 Posted 2 October 2012 Someone's now claiming they saw Jimmy Saville and Gary Glitter colluding in abuse together!!
Guest MattP Posted 2 October 2012 Posted 2 October 2012 Someone's now claiming they saw Jimmy Saville and Gary Glitter colluding in abuse together!! If that's the case Gary should have sent his computer for Jim to fix it rather than PC World.
rico Posted 2 October 2012 Posted 2 October 2012 If that's the case Gary should have sent his computer for Jim to fix it rather than PC World.
Guest Bilo Posted 2 October 2012 Posted 2 October 2012 Apparently Gary Glitter offered to swap Jimmy Savile a 10 for two 5s. Sorry.
1964FOX Posted 3 October 2012 Posted 3 October 2012 What annoys me most is that people knew what he was up to but didn't want to risk losing their celebrity status and lifestyle if they tried to expose him, as others have said they are as bad as Saville himself. There are far too many seperate sources now for there not to be any substance in the allegations.
Bettsj2 Posted 3 October 2012 Posted 3 October 2012 I'll agree that accusations aren't proof but even so with the amount of people coming out of the woodwork don't you at least have a bit of doubt? Ask John Leslie that question. The first part of this Exposure programme was embarrasingly bullshit.
Mack Posted 4 October 2012 Author Posted 4 October 2012 I'm not sure where the bullshit comments come from. I've just watched the exposure programme on ITV player and it's obvious he was a nonce, and wasn't even that bothered about keeping it quiet. http://www.itv.com/itvplayer/video/?Filter=326137
Guest shearfox Posted 4 October 2012 Posted 4 October 2012 Just makes me sick, that is all I have to say on the matter.
Guest MattP Posted 4 October 2012 Posted 4 October 2012 I'm not sure where the bullshit comments come from. I've just watched the exposure programme on ITV player and it's obvious he was a nonce, and wasn't even that bothered about keeping it quiet. http://www.itv.com/i.../?Filter=326137 Yep. Numerous people, stories all pretty much matched up, same thing. More coming out as we speak. As clear a nonce as you'll get.
hairy Posted 4 October 2012 Posted 4 October 2012 Gary Glitter is involved now Gary Glitter 'raped a girl in Jimmy Savile's dressing room'Gary Glitter, the musician convicted of child sex offences, raped a girl in Sir Jimmy Savile's dressing room in front of the television presenter, it has been claimed The BBC faced fresh claims over Sir Jimmy Savile after it was alleged that Gary Glitter raped a girl of 13 in his dressing room at the corporation's television centre. The attack, in the 1970s allegedly took place as Sir Jimmy was groping a 14-year-old in the same room. A third star – a household-name entertainer who still performs – was also abusing a schoolgirl, according to the claims. The allegations were made by Karin Ward, a former pupil of the Surrey school where Sir Jimmy is accused of preying on under-age girls. She waived her anonymity to tell an ITV documentary screened last night how the Jim'll Fix It star was working with Glitter, a convicted paedophile. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9586024/Gary-Glitter-raped-a-girl-in-Jimmy-Saviles-dressing-room.html
Parafox Posted 4 October 2012 Posted 4 October 2012 Gary Glitter is involved now [/size] http://www.telegraph...ssing-room.html Next it'll be Glitter, Savile, half the Catholic priests and a random scoutmaster all aboard the Haute de la Garenne express. Much of this is likely to be a result of an insatiable press feeding frenzy to sell more papers, i'm afraid.
Guest MattP Posted 4 October 2012 Posted 4 October 2012 Next it'll be Glitter, Savile, half the Catholic priests and a random scoutmaster all aboard the Haute de la Garenne express. Much of this is likely to be a result of an insatiable press feeding frenzy to sell more papers, i'm afraid. Is it that hard to believe though given the footage last night is it? Him and Glitter cuddling upto 13 year olds on tv, his staggering defence of Glitters antics in Cambodia? Glitters kiddy porn was ok as he didnt sell it to anyone, it was just his. "He goes out there and they put two girls on him, y'now what it's like"
THEFATBASTARD Posted 4 October 2012 Posted 4 October 2012 Have people forgot about bill wyman and mandy smith ?...he was taking her out as his "girlfriend" to show biz parties when she was 13...nobody batted an eyelid..no wonder savile, johnanthan king and glitter etc.. thought they could get away with anything they liked.
21st Century Fox Posted 4 October 2012 Posted 4 October 2012 Who's going to start the odds for the unnamed entertainer?
LJS Posted 4 October 2012 Posted 4 October 2012 The name will be revealed soon enough. ITV have just overturned an injunction in relation to the case. Easy enough to find if people are interested.
pSinatra Posted 4 October 2012 Posted 4 October 2012 Who's going to start the odds for the unnamed entertainer? What prefix should we use to avoid prosecution?
LJS Posted 4 October 2012 Posted 4 October 2012 And now the bloke behind last night's program has revealed the name; Freddy Starr.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.