Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
GLC

Forest Post Match 2-2

Recommended Posts

Posted

Obviously they are going to be biased, but all posts no matter what it's about is so aggressive and lacks any real point to the message despite showing off swear words.

Very much like an average day on here then.

And I hadn't noticed amongst the 400 posts about it, they Genuinly don't are about us ;) haha of course not! Show some common sense and humility at least.

Do people still not get this? Surely it is a wind up - And it works.

Some of our fans seem so desperate for them to hate us and they come along with 'We don't care about you, Derby are our rivals' and it winds some of our fans up. Personally I don't really care about Forest or Derby for that matter (Apart from when we play them of course), basically because of where I live.

Posted

Yes it was

Officials will make errors

Waggy takes his chances.. Game over

Exactly, we could have put the game to bed several times if Waggy could finish. We can't blame referee decisions all season for not getting promoted.

Posted

Exactly, we could have put the game to bed several times if Waggy could finish. We can't blame referee decisions all season for not getting promoted.

It's alot easier though isn't it.

It makes us feel a sense of injustice and conspiracy.

Posted

Nobody mentioned the racist forest disabled yet?

What racist forest disabled? Didn't even notice him lol

(I laugh because it's the only appropriate response to racism :thumbup: )

Posted

Yes it was

Officials will make errors

Waggy takes his chances.. Game over

Strikers will miss chances

Ref makes the correct decision.. Game over 2- 1

We lost two points today because we can't finish and because of another shite decision. Neither of these alone would have cost us the game, but as we can only control one of them I suggest our players start working on putting away their chances.

Posted

What racist forest disabled? Didn't even notice him lol

(I laugh because it's the only appropriate response to racism :thumbup: )

Confirmed by Leicestershire Police that a Forest fan was arrested for racially aggravated offence. He was 'allegedly' doing monkey chants towards a black Leicester fan in L1 until we all started chanting 'racist, racist, racist' and then he thought he'd do a runner and he got nicked. Pleb.

Posted

Enough about Dyer.

It's all boring

Finishing is and was the problem today

Waggy linked up well, but won't score enough

Etc etc etc....

Glad your not a Leeds fan Col, you'd be hanging yourself :P:chant: I
Posted

On today's game, just briefly:

- Schlupp was excellent at left back. Showed great pace and strength, solid in the air and a major threat in attack always looking to play the ball out. Another thing that I like about Schlupp is that often it can be tempting for an inexperienced full back to go to ground but not once did he today. It was evident from the start that Forest tried to target Schlupp but he coped well. I genuinely believe that if he plays like this against Ipswich (if Konch isn't back), he could displace Konch for quite a while. He has a big future at left back if he can churn out these performances every week, in comparison - he's better than Mattock.

- Waghorn was my Man of the Match. He has received some serious abuse on the radio and on here today. In comparison with 'Beckford the messiah', his hold up play was excellent, his touch has improved since his lacklustre start to the season, he's a complete nuisance to opposing defenders when they were on the ball and was constantly seen on the shoulder of the last man and made some cracking runs. The only thing lacking from his performance today was a goal. One goal could spark him.

- The referee was an utter shaft, only equal to the fat c*nt Jon Moss who sent Kasper off at the City Ground last year. Never ever a penalty (although there was no reason for Whitbread to go down.. Sharp was going nowhere. Was an excellent tackle but it allowed the referee the capability of giving that decision). As for our penalty claims, clear handball all day long. Very frustrating that we keep getting inept referees who insist on giving dodgy decisions against us, is there some kind of FA conspiracy here?

Posted

On today's game, just briefly:

- Schlupp was excellent at left back. Showed great pace and strength, solid in the air and a major threat in attack always looking to play the ball out. Another thing that I like about Schlupp is that often it can be tempting for an inexperienced full back to go to ground but not once did he today. It was evident from the start that Forest tried to target Schlupp but he coped well. I genuinely believe that if he plays like this against Ipswich (if Konch isn't back), he could displace Konch for quite a while. He has a big future at left back if he can churn out these performances every week, in comparison - he's better than Mattock.

- Waghorn was my Man of the Match. He has received some serious abuse on the radio and on here today. In comparison with 'Beckford the messiah', his hold up play was excellent, his touch has improved since his lacklustre start to the season, he's a complete nuisance to opposing defenders when they were on the ball and was constantly seen on the shoulder of the last man and made some cracking runs. The only thing lacking from his performance today was a goal. One goal could spark him.

- The referee was an utter shaft, only equal to the fat c*nt Jon Moss who sent Kasper off at the City Ground last year. Never ever a penalty (although there was no reason for Whitbread to go down.. Sharp was going nowhere. Was an excellent tackle but it allowed the referee the capability of giving that decision). As for our penalty claims, clear handball all day long. Very frustrating that we keep getting inept referees who insist on giving dodgy decisions against us, is there some kind of FA conspiracy here?

Thaiism?
Posted

On today's game, just briefly:

- Schlupp was excellent at left back. Showed great pace and strength, solid in the air and a major threat in attack always looking to play the ball out. Another thing that I like about Schlupp is that often it can be tempting for an inexperienced full back to go to ground but not once did he today. It was evident from the start that Forest tried to target Schlupp but he coped well. I genuinely believe that if he plays like this against Ipswich (if Konch isn't back), he could displace Konch for quite a while. He has a big future at left back if he can churn out these performances every week, in comparison - he's better than Mattock.

:appl:

Posted

On today's game, just briefly:

- Schlupp was excellent at left back. Showed great pace and strength, solid in the air and a major threat in attack always looking to play the ball out. Another thing that I like about Schlupp is that often it can be tempting for an inexperienced full back to go to ground but not once did he today. It was evident from the start that Forest tried to target Schlupp but he coped well. I genuinely believe that if he plays like this against Ipswich (if Konch isn't back), he could displace Konch for quite a while. He has a big future at left back if he can churn out these performances every week, in comparison - he's better than Mattock.

Schlupp gave the ball away in midfield crassly and Forest ran through and gained the unwarranted penalty. If Schlupp had passed the ball accurately there would have been no move resulting in the penalty.

Posted

Schlupp gave the ball away in midfield crassly and Forest ran through and gained the unwarranted penalty. If Schlupp had passed the ball accurately there would have been no move resulting in the penalty.

You cannot blame Schlupp for a poor decision. You could say that one of the times anyone gave it away could have lead to anything, that is just illogical.
Posted

Schlupp gave the ball away in midfield crassly and Forest ran through and gained the unwarranted penalty. If Schlupp had passed the ball accurately there would have been no move resulting in the penalty.

Yes, he gave the ball away but he's not the first person to give the ball away is he? I heard an interview with Mark Hughes and he said goals are conceded from a series of errors and rarely through a single error. Unfortunately for us it was a refereeing error.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

On today's game, just briefly:

- Schlupp was excellent at left back. Showed great pace and strength, solid in the air and a major threat in attack always looking to play the ball out. Another thing that I like about Schlupp is that often it can be tempting for an inexperienced full back to go to ground but not once did he today. It was evident from the start that Forest tried to target Schlupp but he coped well. I genuinely believe that if he plays like this against Ipswich (if Konch isn't back), he could displace Konch for quite a while. He has a big future at left back if he can churn out these performances every week, in comparison - he's better than Mattock.

- Waghorn was my Man of the Match. He has received some serious abuse on the radio and on here today. In comparison with 'Beckford the messiah', his hold up play was excellent, his touch has improved since his lacklustre start to the season, he's a complete nuisance to opposing defenders when they were on the ball and was constantly seen on the shoulder of the last man and made some cracking runs. The only thing lacking from his performance today was a goal. One goal could spark him.

- The referee was an utter shaft, only equal to the fat c*nt Jon Moss who sent Kasper off at the City Ground last year. Never ever a penalty (although there was no reason for Whitbread to go down.. Sharp was going nowhere. Was an excellent tackle but it allowed the referee the capability of giving that decision). As for our penalty claims, clear handball all day long. Very frustrating that we keep getting inept referees who insist on giving dodgy decisions against us, is there some kind of FA conspiracy here?

If you can't see that, despite his all round game, Waggy couldn't hit a fookin barn door, you are a bigger tit than even I thought.

We played some great stuff today and if we had a second good striker it would have been over by half time.

To give Waghorn MOTM today displays your general inability to analyse a game.

To draw today's game was scandalous.

It should have been a controlled victory.

As I said in the week, if we had another Cottee or Dickov in the side we'd be 10 points clear by now.

Today demonstrated why.

Posted

Schlupp gave the ball away in midfield crassly and Forest ran through and gained the unwarranted penalty. If Schlupp had passed the ball accurately there would have been no move resulting in the penalty.

So what? It's one misplaced pass, I imagine most players are guilty of that every week.

If you can't see that, despite his all round game, Waggy couldn't hit a fookin barn door, you are a bigger tit than even I thought.

We played some great stuff today and if we had a second good striker it would have been over by half time.

To give Waghorn MOTM today displays your general inability to analyse a game.

Did you miss the chance Camp barely got a hand to and yes he could of done better but he did have one cleared off the line. Had it not been for him we also would not have taken a 5th minute lead so your 'If he'd taken that chance we'd have won' mentality is seriously flawed. Is it really just a fluke that Waghorn has been so involved in almost all of our good attacks in recent games, and yes he has failed to score, but his performances have been top class recently and if he keeps earning himself these chances eventually they will go in the back of the net. To fail to see that his all round contribution was up there with any other Leicester player today shows your general inability to analyse a game and that you are clearly too quick to judge a player on one chance, I honestly feel that there was only one chance that Waghorn could have done any better with today, and yes that should have gone into the back of the net. But that doesn't stop him being the best player on the pitch.

Posted

You cannot blame Schlupp for a poor decision. You could say that one of the times anyone gave it away could have lead to anything, that is just illogical.

But people can blame the referee for a poor decision.

Jokes, calm down people.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

So what? It's one misplaced pass, I imagine most players are guilty of that every week.

Did you miss the chance Camp barely got a hand to and yes he could of done better but he did have one cleared off the line. Had it not been for him we also would not have taken a 5th minute lead so your 'If he'd taken that chance we'd have won' mentality is seriously flawed. Is it really just a fluke that Waghorn has been so involved in almost all of our good attacks in recent games, and yes he has failed to score, but his performances have been top class recently and if he keeps earning himself these chances eventually they will go in the back of the net. To fail to see that his all round contribution was up there with any other Leicester player today shows your general inability to analyse a game and that you are clearly too quick to judge a player on one chance, I honestly feel that there was only one chance that Waghorn could have done any better with today, and yes that should have gone into the back of the net. But that doesn't stop him being the best player on the pitch.

I stand by everything I said.

I have nothing against Waggy but if we had a second, class striker today the game would have been dead and buried.

Delude yourself all you like. Missed chances resulted in the draw. Clear as crystal.

It don't matter he played particularly well. He's there to convert chances.

Posted

I'm going to lose it with the amount of people saying ' we need a class striker'

Like who???????

It's not as easy as that, you can't guarantee goals whoever you have and players that will score goals will usually be too good for us and will cost a fortune. I don't get it. Fair enough we are missing chances but who do people suggest we sign to sort it out then.

I'm sorry I'm not having a go at anybody in particular, it's all just so vague and annoying.

"We need to score more goals" ....well yesssss??!

Guest Col city fan
Posted

I'm going to lose it with the amount of people saying ' we need a class striker'

Like who???????

It's not as easy as that, you can't guarantee goals whoever you have and players that will score goals will usually be too good for us and will cost a fortune. I don't get it. Fair enough we are missing chances but who do people suggest we sign to sort it out then.

I'm sorry I'm not having a go at anybody in particular, it's all just so vague and annoying.

"We need to score more goals" ....well yesssss??!

All depends if we want to spend any money.

Really is that simple.

Posted

All depends if we want to spend any money.

Really is that simple.

Spending money has a history of solving all our problems doesn't it.

Posted

All depends if we want to spend any money.

Really is that simple.

But if it was that easy to identify such a player that would sort the issue...would we and every other side have not done it already?

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Spending money has a history of solving all our problems doesn't it.

There's spending money the Sven way.

Then there's spending money wisely.

Why not back down a little from your holier than thou stance?

We all want City to do well. I've most probably followed them for longer than you. And I know we need another goalscorer.

Posted

Schlupp gave the ball away in midfield crassly and Forest ran through and gained the unwarranted penalty. If Schlupp had passed the ball accurately there would have been no move resulting in the penalty.

Thats crazy.

So Schlupp is to blame for the referee giving a penalty that even the forest manager admitted wasnt a penalty?

No one plays the blame game better than Leicester City fans....

Posted

There's spending money the Sven way.

Then there's spending money wisely.

Why not back down a little from your holier than thou stance?

We all want City to do well. I've most probably followed them for longer than you. And I know we need another goalscorer.

Fair point and your entitled to your opinion.

But who out there is better than what we have, would not cost the sort of money Sven chucked about, and would guarantee goals? That's what I'm asking.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...