Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
David Hankey

New goalkeeper required....................................

By David Hankey, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

David Hankey

David Hankey

Posted
Posted

no, not to replace Schmeichel but Logan.

Logan, surprisingly our longest serving player currently on the books, needs to be playing and I'm sure if we off-loaded him he could do well at another Club and gain some invaluable experience and more importantly playing time. To be stuck on the bench match after match month after month can't be doing him any good. He'll have forgotten what a football looks like soon.

The Club could easily acquire another young keeper, perhaps one who would test Kasper a bit more.

RizLCFC

RizLCFC

Posted
Posted

Agree with your last point, I think it would be good to have another keeper here who would challenge Kasper, but Conrad ain't that bad, and he seems happy to just be here even if he's not playing, he seems like a really good person to have around as well.

Collymore

Collymore

Posted
Posted

Couldn't disagree more with OP for 2 reasons.

Reason 1 - Logan is gold dust. Never causes a stir and he's not a bad keeper. Yes he's prone to the odd error just when you think "actually, Logan has done quite well the 3 games our main keeper is injured"

Reason 2 - Kasper is the least likely player in our squad to get "comfortable". His hunger to win and be the best he can be is just obsence. The exact opposite was Weale. You had to check for a pulse some days when the ball flew over his head when he conceded another long ranger. Weale use to get very comfortable indeed. Kasper on the other hand would be gutted if he conceded in 5 aside knock around. Whether we have a quality backup or not would make no difference to Kaspers game.

GLC

GLC

Posted
Posted

I like Logan, He's not bothered about being back up keeper, never caused any issues and isn't a bad keeper

Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted

Couldn't disagree more with OP for 2 reasons.

Reason 1 - Logan is gold dust. Never causes a stir and he's not a bad keeper. Yes he's prone to the odd error just when you think "actually, Logan has done quite well the 3 games our main keeper is injured"

Reason 2 - Kasper is the least likely player in our squad to get "comfortable". His hunger to win and be the best he can be is just obsence. The exact opposite was Weale. You had to check for a pulse some days when the ball flew over his head when he conceded another long ranger. Weale use to get very comfortable indeed. Kasper on the other hand would be gutted if he conceded in 5 aside knock around. Whether we have a quality backup or not would make no difference to Kaspers game.

Couldnt agree with this more.

As somebody else mentioned Smith is also supposed to have a big future ahead of him.

No need for change on that front.

fleckneymike

fleckneymike

Posted
Posted

Conrad is woeful BUT very cheap. So provided he never makes a first team appearance he can stay and be pleasant.

Please don't ever think he's any good though. He's not. He's shit. The only manager who ever rated him was Worthington and he was rewarded by Conrad with an average of 2 goals against per match.

Happy Fox

Happy Fox

Posted
Posted

Conrad is woeful BUT very cheap. So provided he never makes a first team appearance he can stay and be pleasant.

Please don't ever think he's any good though. He's not. He's shit. The only manager who ever rated him was Worthington and he was rewarded by Conrad with an average of 2 goals against per match.

Agreed.

LCFC Todd

LCFC Todd

Posted
Posted

Saw Logan play against Hinckley in the friendly most recently and he wasn't too bad, granted against a (sadly, poor) non-league team, We don't need to replace Logan because he's a nice guy to have around the place and Kasper is the player in the squad who least needs pressure to succeed, his hunger and desire does it for him.

clare

clare

Posted
Posted

Couldn't disagree more with OP for 2 reasons.

Reason 1 - Logan is gold dust. Never causes a stir and he's not a bad keeper. Yes he's prone to the odd error just when you think "actually, Logan has done quite well the 3 games our main keeper is injured"

Reason 2 - Kasper is the least likely player in our squad to get "comfortable". His hunger to win and be the best he can be is just obsence. The exact opposite was Weale. You had to check for a pulse some days when the ball flew over his head when he conceded another long ranger. Weale use to get very comfortable indeed. Kasper on the other hand would be gutted if he conceded in 5 aside knock around. Whether we have a quality backup or not would make no difference to Kaspers game.

Well said. Couldn't agree more with you!

Zingari

Zingari

Posted
Posted

Couldn't disagree more with OP for 2 reasons.

Reason 1 - Logan is gold dust. Never causes a stir and he's not a bad keeper. Yes he's prone to the odd error just when you think "actually, Logan has done quite well the 3 games our main keeper is injured"

Reason 2 - Kasper is the least likely player in our squad to get "comfortable". His hunger to win and be the best he can be is just obsence. The exact opposite was Weale. You had to check for a pulse some days when the ball flew over his head when he conceded another long ranger. Weale use to get very comfortable indeed. Kasper on the other hand would be gutted if he conceded in 5 aside knock around. Whether we have a quality backup or not would make no difference to Kaspers game.

yep , there's no point in keeping expensive disgruntled benchwarmers , he adequate for the job unless KS gets a long term injury

Tubbymofo

Tubbymofo

Posted
Posted

yep , there's no point in keeping expensive disgruntled benchwarmers , he adequate for the job unless KS gets a long term injury

This

If Kasper gets injured Logan can fill in until an emergency loan can be sorted

Walshy5

Walshy5

Posted
Posted

Logan is not good enough to be a 1st choice Championship goal keeper but i bet no 2nd choice keeper in any team in our league is. You wont get any keeper of any real quality who is willing to sit on the bench week in week out.

Jakemoore

Jakemoore

Posted
Posted

Conrad is woeful BUT very cheap. So provided he never makes a first team appearance he can stay and be pleasant.

Please don't ever think he's any good though. He's not. He's shit. The only manager who ever rated him was Worthington and he was rewarded by Conrad with an average of 2 goals against per match.

Was that all down to Logan then? Because I seem to remember some shocking defending all round during his short spell. Leave Conrad alone, the guy is alright!

Richard

Richard

Posted
Posted

He's willing to sit around all season and just play the occasional Reserves or Cup match whilst adding a little bit of cover. Can guarantee that if Kasper gets injured for a long period, an emergency loan would be signed.

dannythefox

dannythefox

Posted
Posted

No point, Logan is a good keeper always look ok when I've seen him play. Kasper is a very good keeper and he's not the type of keeper who needs to be kept on his toes you just need to look at him on match days.

David Hankey

David Hankey

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I don't see how anyone can consider Logan a good or bad keeper. That wasn't the reason for posting this topic. I would have thought it was all to do with a professional footballer wanting to play. He's not getting a game even on an irregular basis and keeping a seat warm week in week out season in season out isn't doing him or the Club any good. Surely playing even at a lower level is better than his current position.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...