David Hankey Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 no, not to replace Schmeichel but Logan. Logan, surprisingly our longest serving player currently on the books, needs to be playing and I'm sure if we off-loaded him he could do well at another Club and gain some invaluable experience and more importantly playing time. To be stuck on the bench match after match month after month can't be doing him any good. He'll have forgotten what a football looks like soon. The Club could easily acquire another young keeper, perhaps one who would test Kasper a bit more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RizLCFC Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Agree with your last point, I think it would be good to have another keeper here who would challenge Kasper, but Conrad ain't that bad, and he seems happy to just be here even if he's not playing, he seems like a really good person to have around as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collymore Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Couldn't disagree more with OP for 2 reasons. Reason 1 - Logan is gold dust. Never causes a stir and he's not a bad keeper. Yes he's prone to the odd error just when you think "actually, Logan has done quite well the 3 games our main keeper is injured" Reason 2 - Kasper is the least likely player in our squad to get "comfortable". His hunger to win and be the best he can be is just obsence. The exact opposite was Weale. You had to check for a pulse some days when the ball flew over his head when he conceded another long ranger. Weale use to get very comfortable indeed. Kasper on the other hand would be gutted if he conceded in 5 aside knock around. Whether we have a quality backup or not would make no difference to Kaspers game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSpaM Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Logan is actually a pretty good keeper from the games i've seen him play, granted it's not many but he's a decent back up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolhandfox Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Logan fine, no trouble, knows the club and cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLC Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 I like Logan, He's not bothered about being back up keeper, never caused any issues and isn't a bad keeper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose2010 Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Adam Smith is meant to class for his age as well, no point in spending money when we don't need to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambert09 Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Couldn't disagree more with OP for 2 reasons. Reason 1 - Logan is gold dust. Never causes a stir and he's not a bad keeper. Yes he's prone to the odd error just when you think "actually, Logan has done quite well the 3 games our main keeper is injured" Reason 2 - Kasper is the least likely player in our squad to get "comfortable". His hunger to win and be the best he can be is just obsence. The exact opposite was Weale. You had to check for a pulse some days when the ball flew over his head when he conceded another long ranger. Weale use to get very comfortable indeed. Kasper on the other hand would be gutted if he conceded in 5 aside knock around. Whether we have a quality backup or not would make no difference to Kaspers game. Couldnt agree with this more. As somebody else mentioned Smith is also supposed to have a big future ahead of him. No need for change on that front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munshi Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 In the pre-match shooting he makes quite a lot of brilliant saves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleckneymike Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Conrad is woeful BUT very cheap. So provided he never makes a first team appearance he can stay and be pleasant. Please don't ever think he's any good though. He's not. He's shit. The only manager who ever rated him was Worthington and he was rewarded by Conrad with an average of 2 goals against per match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Fox Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Conrad is woeful BUT very cheap. So provided he never makes a first team appearance he can stay and be pleasant. Please don't ever think he's any good though. He's not. He's shit. The only manager who ever rated him was Worthington and he was rewarded by Conrad with an average of 2 goals against per match. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCFC Todd Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Saw Logan play against Hinckley in the friendly most recently and he wasn't too bad, granted against a (sadly, poor) non-league team, We don't need to replace Logan because he's a nice guy to have around the place and Kasper is the player in the squad who least needs pressure to succeed, his hunger and desire does it for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clare Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Couldn't disagree more with OP for 2 reasons. Reason 1 - Logan is gold dust. Never causes a stir and he's not a bad keeper. Yes he's prone to the odd error just when you think "actually, Logan has done quite well the 3 games our main keeper is injured" Reason 2 - Kasper is the least likely player in our squad to get "comfortable". His hunger to win and be the best he can be is just obsence. The exact opposite was Weale. You had to check for a pulse some days when the ball flew over his head when he conceded another long ranger. Weale use to get very comfortable indeed. Kasper on the other hand would be gutted if he conceded in 5 aside knock around. Whether we have a quality backup or not would make no difference to Kaspers game. Well said. Couldn't agree more with you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zingari Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Couldn't disagree more with OP for 2 reasons. Reason 1 - Logan is gold dust. Never causes a stir and he's not a bad keeper. Yes he's prone to the odd error just when you think "actually, Logan has done quite well the 3 games our main keeper is injured" Reason 2 - Kasper is the least likely player in our squad to get "comfortable". His hunger to win and be the best he can be is just obsence. The exact opposite was Weale. You had to check for a pulse some days when the ball flew over his head when he conceded another long ranger. Weale use to get very comfortable indeed. Kasper on the other hand would be gutted if he conceded in 5 aside knock around. Whether we have a quality backup or not would make no difference to Kaspers game. yep , there's no point in keeping expensive disgruntled benchwarmers , he adequate for the job unless KS gets a long term injury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubbymofo Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 yep , there's no point in keeping expensive disgruntled benchwarmers , he adequate for the job unless KS gets a long term injury This If Kasper gets injured Logan can fill in until an emergency loan can be sorted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Fatboyslow_ Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Logan a decant keeper. Can I have some of what you are on. The reason he us our longest serving player is no one else wants him and he is happy with his lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiftyFox Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Logan seems very good in the warm ups before a match Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walshy5 Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Logan is not good enough to be a 1st choice Championship goal keeper but i bet no 2nd choice keeper in any team in our league is. You wont get any keeper of any real quality who is willing to sit on the bench week in week out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brenfox Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Logan has always done very well when he has gone out on loan. He is fine as backup, if Kasper gets injured then we can get someone else in on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakemoore Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 Conrad is woeful BUT very cheap. So provided he never makes a first team appearance he can stay and be pleasant. Please don't ever think he's any good though. He's not. He's shit. The only manager who ever rated him was Worthington and he was rewarded by Conrad with an average of 2 goals against per match. Was that all down to Logan then? Because I seem to remember some shocking defending all round during his short spell. Leave Conrad alone, the guy is alright! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakemoore Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 In addition to my last post, I'm very surprised he hasn't moved on! He must feel he can do better, surely!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 He's willing to sit around all season and just play the occasional Reserves or Cup match whilst adding a little bit of cover. Can guarantee that if Kasper gets injured for a long period, an emergency loan would be signed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymourbust Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 In addition to my last post, I'm very surprised he hasn't moved on! He must feel he can do better, surely!! He is doing everything he can...and stop calling me Shirley! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannythefox Posted 28 December 2012 Share Posted 28 December 2012 No point, Logan is a good keeper always look ok when I've seen him play. Kasper is a very good keeper and he's not the type of keeper who needs to be kept on his toes you just need to look at him on match days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Hankey Posted 28 December 2012 Author Share Posted 28 December 2012 I don't see how anyone can consider Logan a good or bad keeper. That wasn't the reason for posting this topic. I would have thought it was all to do with a professional footballer wanting to play. He's not getting a game even on an irregular basis and keeping a seat warm week in week out season in season out isn't doing him or the Club any good. Surely playing even at a lower level is better than his current position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.