ealingfox Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 This is ok but if we lose to Palace you'll be all doom and gloom again, no doubt. If we lose to Palace I'll be disappointed and/or upset? What an irrational monster I am. If we lose to Palace then realistically we are relying on other teams being shite. Even very optimistically we aren't looking at more than 5 points from the next 4 after Palace, and if all the teams near pick up more than 5 points from their next 5 we will have a mountain to climb.
Haydos Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 End of tether, throwing yours toys out the pram. Same thing my friend, your getting angry over a bunch of forum posts. Angry over some shit someone posts on a forum And I'm the childish one there's much more important things to get angry over. If you don't like it block me, join the I can't cope with Kingfox's posts brigade. Mate, you're a tool. The sooner you realise it the better. If you say half the things you do on here in real life then god help anyone who has to spend time listening to you.
Strokes Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 Crikey even if we get beat by palace it's not going to be the end, although confidence would be on the floor. We have quite a few winnable games left, take a look. If you still can't find faith, I think it's time you looked at yourselves you miserable twats.
C-man Posted 3 February 2015 Posted 3 February 2015 I literally can't believe that this forum has once again descended back into the ridiculous, tedious and stupid 'Pearson-bummers'/'Happy-Clappers' v '#PearsonOut Brigade'/'Boo-Boys' dichotomy that we've had to endure way too much in the past. It is so, so boring. The same dead-end debates and awful arguments being recycled over and over and over again. And without exception they more or less boil down to the same basic ideas. The most damaging part is that because a section of our fanbase has never liked Pearson and refused obstinately to warm to him despite his achievements, dizzying high points and valuable service to the Club, they will not pull together during our run-in and our crowds will not be united behind the team. He's been doggo in numerous ways this season but survival is still very possible. Why not just stick together, focus on our positives and see what happens for 3 months? If we go down is there really a cogent argument for getting rid in the summer? Based on his tenures here, no there definitely isn't. One thing you might take heart from is that every time Pearson has come under this kind of attack from his detractors and this forum has returned to this sorry state of affairs, Pearson has always come out on top. Most emphatically last summer. We do really need a win against Palace though. Bravo. Agree with every single word.
Guest Col city fan Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 I apologise if you somehow took my post out of context. I was not commenting on your discussion regarding Kramaric, instead I posted that I wasn't expecting to win the game, but also wasn't expecting to play a central midfield 2 of King and Drinkwater. My intention on this forum is to put my views across, to defend my position, to contribute in the way I see as being the most productive i can. I do not intend to aggravate or to offend. I never have. The 'Babble on' play on words has been used by other posters, and in my case, is used in jest. So if this was your perception, it was unintended on my part. You're point about Kramaric, I agree with completely. I've often said I consider your views to be amongst the best on the forum, generally. Sorry about not getting back to you before, it's a busy time. Take care. Colin
Monsell1976 Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 I literally can't believe that this forum has once again descended back into the ridiculous, tedious and stupid 'Pearson-bummers'/'Happy-Clappers' v '#PearsonOut Brigade'/'Boo-Boys' dichotomy that we've had to endure way too much in the past. It is so, so boring. The same dead-end debates and awful arguments being recycled over and over and over again. And without exception they more or less boil down to the same basic ideas. The most damaging part is that because a section of our fanbase has never liked Pearson and refused obstinately to warm to him despite his achievements, dizzying high points and valuable service to the Club, they will not pull together during our run-in and our crowds will not be united behind the team. He's been doggo in numerous ways this season but survival is still very possible. Why not just stick together, focus on our positives and see what happens for 3 months? If we go down is there really a cogent argument for getting rid in the summer? Based on his tenures here, no there definitely isn't. One thing you might take heart from is that every time Pearson has come under this kind of attack from his detractors and this forum has returned to this sorry state of affairs, Pearson has always come out on top. Most emphatically last summer. We do really need a win against Palace though. I am as frustrated as anyone, and have my doubts about pearsons ability at this level, but I cannot be arsed with this thread, or this forum at the minute.I have to agree, it's the same argument for and against, and the same opinions keep going around, and around. This season hasn't been a good one, and there is no point debating wether Pearson should be sacked, as much as many managers would have been with his record, but it's clear the owners have no intentions of getting rid, if they were, he'd be gone by now.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Keep Him In No! No! No! No! Who are we talking about?
veezeeblue Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Hi Everyone I been away from the forum for a while how is everyone ??
biggs Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Hi Everyone I been away from the forum for a while how is everyone ?? Either completely miserable or utterly over the moon. Not many grey areas on this forum
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Either completely miserable or utterly over the moon. Not many grey areas on this forumI've still got splinters in my arse Neither happy nor sad Don't want us to sack NP but that said really not bothered either way about whoever is manager as I care about Leicester City not individuals
Stadt Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Why is it the older posters in particular who want Pearson out? Because he's not as good as O'neil?
Unabomber Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Why is it the older posters in particular who want Pearson out? Because he's not as good as O'neil? I was wondering this, maybe short term memory loss I dunno.
Corky Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Why is it the older posters in particular who want Pearson out? Because he's not as good as O'neil? It's only UFS people that actually like Pearson. Everyone else can't stand him.
Stadt Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 It's only UFS people that actually like Pearson. Everyone else can't stand him. They're all lefties that tolerate muesli terrorists and stuff
biggs Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Next home game....5 minutes of loud confrontation: we're all about confrontation...right? One lot singing 'There's only one Nigel Pearson' and the other lot chanting 'Pearson Out' Who'd be the loudest? Who'd quit first? I could enjoy the ridiculousness from my couch in front of my TV here 7,431km away.
dogadug Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Why is it the older posters in particular who want Pearson out? Because he's not as good as O'neil? I've noticed that too
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Why is it the older posters in particular who want Pearson out? Because he's not as good as O'neil? Who is that aimed at Wookie?
Carl the Llama Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Who is that aimed at Wookie? I'm gonna say the older posters who want Pearson out. Just a stab in the dark.
hackneyfox Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Why is it the older posters in particular who want Pearson out? Because he's not as good as O'neil? I was wondering this, maybe short term memory loss I dunno. Because we're too old to have teenage infatuations and support the club not individuals?
Unabomber Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Because we're too old to have teenage infatuations and support the club not individuals? Possibly, I'm open to all theories.
Stadt Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 Because we're too old to have teenage infatuations and support the club not individuals? I'm completely in love with being a normal human being
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 5 February 2015 Posted 5 February 2015 I'm gonna say the older posters who want Pearson out. Just a stab in the dark.Was thinking more which particular posters you thick cvnt
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.