MooseBreath Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 I wish I could say I can't see this standing up in court, but the truth is that I really can see it happening and the obvious consequence of many more men having their lives ruined by false rape claims. The premise is absurd, you'd need to video record experts carrying out a full medical and psychological evaluation on the female prior to her explicity giving her consent on film. It's laughable, pathetic but more than that it's just plain scary. Men are targets now and the police will assist in bringing us down.
Benji Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 Trust me it is. That might be what some of your Tinder dates feel like.
Guest MattP Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 I'm pretty sure by definition that's not possible. Maybe not rape, but sexual assault is very possible and it's incredible that we never see women being prosecuted for things that are probably quite common with men who are too drunk to consent.
Unabomber Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 lolThat might be what some of your Tinder dates feel like. I just wanna confirm I have not raped a tinder date.
ScouseFox Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 I just wanna confirm I have not raped a tinder date. ever been raped on one though?
Unabomber Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 ever been raped on one though?I dunno, it might have been.
Maybes Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 So a fair chunk of the male population face being called rapists after have drunken sex then?
MPH Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 And how exactly do you PROVE someone has said yes? Pull out a signed contract?
David Guiza Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 Does the same rule apply if a woman rapes a man? Of course it's only fairly that the rule should be identical for each gender, but siince when have police investigations ever been about equality or fairness? And of course they're going to concentrate on men, because anybody with a brain can tell you that more women are raped than men, and that women are more vulnerable on a whole, although we all know women who aren't. I know for a fact that police are told to stereotype and, rightly or wrongly, this is no different. I don't agree with it per se, but It's not a case of feminazi's having their way, it's more a matter of protecting the vulnerable, which is what the police are 'supposedly' there to do.
Bellend Sebastian Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 And how exactly do you PROVE someone has said yes? Pull out a signed contract? Get a receipt
ScouseFox Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 defence number 2: did she decline? NO didn't she mind? I DON'T THINK SO
yorkie1999 Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 And how exactly do you PROVE someone has said yes? Pull out a signed contract? Or ask them if they mind making a porno movie..
johnny the fox Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 This is why I always film all my liaison's these days..you can't be too careful.
Bayfox Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 well at least I'm one step closer to getting the wife to let me film it. "but I need too, just to prove you said yes" "just in case like"
Guest MattP Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 I really hate the phrase "cry rape." I bet you don't hate it half as much as those whose lives and reputations are destroyed by women who do it.
ADK Posted 29 January 2015 Author Posted 29 January 2015 Which is? Those statistics assume we know how many actual rapes occur. It's similar to when people argue about benefit fraud or tax evasion.
purpleronnie Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 Oh great now my fleshlight is taking me to court.
Darkon84 Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 I really hate the phrase "cry rape." 'Cry wanks' make you feel just as dirty.
leicsmac Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 Those statistics assume we know how many actual rapes occur. It's similar to when people argue about benefit fraud or tax evasion. I figured that was what you were referring to. It's a fair point, but you would assume they're not plucking a number out of thin air there. But that is just an assumption.
Jon the Hat Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 Good to see you boys are focusing on the tiny number of cases where men have been falsely accused, rather than the thousands or rapes which don't result in a prosecution.
MooseBreath Posted 29 January 2015 Posted 29 January 2015 Good to see you boys are focusing on the tiny number of cases where men have been falsely accused, rather than the thousands or rapes which don't result in a prosecution. Same problem, no stats on false accusations can be relied on because by the very nature of the event, we don't actually have a clue how many accusations are false. This will lead to a free for all, any accusation will lead to a practical assumption of guilt. There will be no realistic defence for probably 99% of blokes in any situation.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.