The Blur Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 There's a ton of issues around this, but the one I cannot help think about is what sort of conversation you could have with a sex doll costing a mere $995. Not likely to be cutting edge A.I. is it? I understand that it seems a bit of a weird concept, but I don't think we should be too quick to dismiss things that could be helpful in managing folks' 'deviant' urges by providing them with a relatively harmless outlet for them. It's not a case of 'encouraging' someone to be a paedophile (having access to a sex robot or not doesn't affect how someone is wired), it's about having some sort of control over how that potentially risky condition manifests itself. Surely it's better than them accessing kiddie porn? Won't be ordering an RRRRR model as I still aspire to getting with the real thing. I CAN DREAM, CAN'T I? I can see what you mean, I won't object to the use of dolls in a controlled environment such as rehab centre where people can carry out exercises (not the abuse but other exercises such as controlling their urges in a presence of a robot where their reactions can then be measured etc) but I do not think they should be freely available on the market. The use of the doll may reduce the amount of children porn being made but they will still be made regardless so the problem will not be eliminated completely.
Bellend Sebastian Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 Which they could continue to do anyway. If the urge is there, then the urge is there. They could just use their minds and their hands if they wanted... but many don't clearly. And having a sex doll doesn't mean they don't go out and have sex with a kid, of course. Let's not forget that an urge doesn't by default lead to an offence - let's face it, Rachel Riley would have police protection from FTers by now if it did. If you're a dangerous predatory paedophile determined to commit offences against children then a doll isn't going make any difference, but if you've got the urge but don't want to offend, either directly or encouraging the exploitation of children by accessing kiddie porn and a weird doll made that easier, isn't that a good thing? And yes, they probably could just use their minds and their hands if they wanted, but given the vast universe of pornography there is now a lot of people seem to find this a bit tricky
Rincewind Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 It is not the actual act that turns them on but the power they get. As in men that commit domestic violence. In a way they are insecure and need to be in charge. That is just the way I see it but I am no expert in psychology which is an entirely different topic. Doubt that I would get or even afford one. Unless there are concessions for OAP's.
Bellend Sebastian Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 I can see what you mean, I won't object to the use of dolls in a controlled environment such as rehab centre where people can carry out exercises (not the abuse but other exercises such as controlling their urges in a presence of a robot where their reactions can then be measured etc) but I do not think they should be freely available on the market. The use of the doll may reduce the amount of children porn being made but they will still be made regardless so the problem will not be eliminated completely. Well I'm certainly inclined to agree with that as that would be seen to be normalising something that you really don't want normalised. Really all I'm saying with this is that even if things seem a bit odd there's a case for them if they help a situation. I'm not suggesting that this would eliminate the problem completely, far from it, but where there's a fine balance between someone offending and not, if this pushes them in the direction of not offending, well, I say hurray to that
The Blur Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 When I saw General Smuts as the last poster on this thread, I thought 'Yes' in the answer to the thread's question
Jordan Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 Holy Uncanny valley, Batman. I'd think most humans would be hard-wired to not go for something like that.
Guest Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 There's a ton of issues around this, I read : "there's a ton of tissues around this".
Webbo Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 No, it'd be too depressing to be turned down by a computer as well.
Wymsey Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 No, it'd be too depressing to be turned down by a computer as well. Especially keyboard warriors, like some on here.
Dr The Singh Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 Knowing my luck the robot would say no or have an headache.I mean Rincy, you struggle with turning on real women/he-she's. Even if Robot had a on switch, you would still struggle to turn it in.
Bellend Sebastian Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 I read : "there's a ton of tissues around this". The night is young. Not even home yet
Mike Oxlong Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 I'already have a love machine. It cleans the carpets too!
FoxInTheBirstallBox Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 imagine if they did a rachel riley one.... i mean really, there would be one sat next to every bloke in the KP!!! an army of sex robots! At least ill know where to stick my clapper
filbertstreet Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 imagine if they did a rachel riley one.... i mean really, there would be one sat next to every bloke in the KP!!! an army of sex robots! At least ill know where to stick my clapper I'd be well pissed off if they did that, hard enough to get a ticket as it is, I'm not losing my seat to a bloody rachel riley sex doll
Benji Posted 16 September 2015 Posted 16 September 2015 So women can have sybians, rabbits and multi-pronged squirmy rooter electric dildos, yet this female professor spits her dummy (no pun intended) when male masturbators start to get some sex / robot action? For shame. Sybians You're clearly a man who keeps up to date with his porn.
Bellend Sebastian Posted 17 September 2015 Posted 17 September 2015 It's going to give that woman who's just been done for pretending to be a bloke so she could shag her mate with a strap on some ideas. "Yes, I'm a particularly realistic sex robot. Of course you can trust me"
Captain... Posted 17 September 2015 Posted 17 September 2015 Personally I'd rather just have a good old fashioned wank.
kingcarr21 Posted 17 September 2015 Posted 17 September 2015 imagine if they did a rachel riley one.... i mean really, there would be one sat next to every bloke in the KP!!! an army of sex robots! At least ill know where to stick my clapper Ive already pre ordered the RRRRR version. The Really Randy Rachel Riley Robot
Rincewind Posted 17 September 2015 Posted 17 September 2015 A lot less mess. You would just have a container to empty every now and again. Just remember not to put it in the dishwasher to clean.
Carl the Llama Posted 17 September 2015 Posted 17 September 2015 Genuinely struggling to understand why my post re. paedophiles not knowing how to use the internet got deleted. It certainly didn't contain any libel or potentially illegal content (or maybe it did? Is one of the mods a paedo who took personal offence to it? I'm very sorry if so). Unless somebody explains to me exactly what about it was unacceptable then I will continue to unabashedly use all the terms contained therein in future topics on similar issues and I guess those posts will have to be deleted too. Please don't tell me it's because I used the term loli hentai. It's a thing. If you don't like it, good, it's pretty disgusting. Still no reason to delete a perfectly inoffensive and humorous post.
DennisNedry Posted 17 September 2015 Posted 17 September 2015 The question is, could they ever make one that actually feels as good as the real thing?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.