EnderbyFox Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 First we discover Corbyn is a friend of Hamas, now we find that Cameron is partial to Ham Ass. Bloody politics eh
Buce Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 By far the most damaging allegation is that he smoked weed while listening to Supertramp. Supertramp, ffs.
johnny the fox Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 The pig has asked for privacy at this difficult time..
Rincewind Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 A non-story. An ex-friend who donated millions of quid to the party is a bit peeved that Cameron did not invite him to a party so he adds a bit of spice to his book revealing the naughty bits to increase sales. The pig thing may have been exaggerated a little. I think he sent his Oxbridgr 'boy' out for a prostitute and he came back with a pigs head and he thought what the hell a hole is a hole and its either this or another jerk. Completely understandable and normal behavior for a young Tory laddie. I find it a little more worrying that the Mail would rather publish this story than the one where a coroner has revealed that in 2014 she wrote a letter to the DWP attributing a man's suicide directly to his benefits being stopped and the DWP and other ministers accepted it. If the pig story had been printed in the Mirror the accusations of all lies would have been ripe. TBF I could not care less about an old Etonian attraction to swine, someone who doesn't button a top button or sings a song about an imaginary friend saving someone that does not need saving. These are non-stories for a public enjoyment.
Darkon84 Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 A non-story. An ex-friend who donated millions of quid to the party is a bit peeved that Cameron did not invite him to a party so he adds a bit of spice to his book revealing the naughty bits to increase sales. The pig thing may have been exaggerated a little. I think he sent his Oxbridgr 'boy' out for a prostitute and he came back with a pigs head and he thought what the hell a hole is a hole and its either this or another jerk. Completely understandable and normal behavior for a young Tory laddie. I find it a little more worrying that the Mail would rather publish this story than the one where a coroner has revealed that in 2014 she wrote a letter to the DWP attributing a man's suicide directly to his benefits being stopped and the DWP and other ministers accepted it. If the pig story had been printed in the Mirror the accusations of all lies would have been ripe. TBF I could not care less about an old Etonian attraction to swine, someone who doesn't button a top button or sings a song about an imaginary friend saving someone that does not need saving. These are non-stories for a public enjoyment. The first bit is just petty really, we get it, you don't like the Conservatives or Cameron. As for the second bit. You always harp on about 'the right wing press' always buddying up with the Conservatives etc and how they always go after Corbyn, yet here's the Daily Mail, with the pig story on the front page and you're still not happy with their reporting (if you can call it that, it's a terrible paper). Does this now mean that you (collective you, in terms of people who always say right wing press) will now admit their so called agenda isn't as bad as it is supposed to be, if indeed there even is one?
Captain... Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 The first bit is just petty really, we get it, you don't like the Conservatives or Cameron. As for the second bit. You always harp on about 'the right wing press' always buddying up with the Conservatives etc and how they always go after Corbyn, yet here's the Daily Mail, with the pig story on the front page and you're still not happy with their reporting (if you can call it that, it's a terrible paper). Does this now mean that you (collective you, in terms of people who always say right wing press) will now admit their so called agenda isn't as bad as it is supposed to be, if indeed there even is one? Their agenda is now just to increase sales with sensationalism and controversy over any real substance. Any serious newspaper would have lead with Cameron's complicity with hiding Ashcroft's non dom status as a sign of corruption at the highest level. Does the fact the guardian and the observer and the BBC have all been laying into Corbyn prove there is no mainstream left wing media?
Nick Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 The Hameron story is so Black Mirror, it makes me wonder if Brooker had heard the rumour before writing it.
Bellend Sebastian Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 The first bit is just petty really, we get it, you don't like the Conservatives or Cameron. As for the second bit. You always harp on about 'the right wing press' always buddying up with the Conservatives etc and how they always go after Corbyn, yet here's the Daily Mail, with the pig story on the front page and you're still not happy with their reporting (if you can call it that, it's a terrible paper). Does this now mean that you (collective you, in terms of people who always say right wing press) will now admit their so called agenda isn't as bad as it is supposed to be, if indeed there even is one? Their agenda is now just to increase sales with sensationalism and controversy over any real substance. Any serious newspaper would have lead with Cameron's complicity with hiding Ashcroft's non dom status as a sign of corruption at the highest level. Does the fact the guardian and the observer and the BBC have all been laying into Corbyn prove there is no mainstream left wing media? The agenda in this case is very much to do with Cameron rather than the Conservatives - he's just won an election and won't stand again so if there's an axe to grind - and as I suggested earlier, there is one (and you could argue Leveson is a bigger threat to the Mail than the Murdoch papers) now's the time to grind it. The Hameron story is so Black Mirror, it makes me wonder if Brooker had heard the rumour before writing it. He's said this morning that he'd never heard anything and that it's a coincidence. He did wonder how Cameron would have felt if he was aware of the programme and there was any truth in the allegations. Would make for awkward viewing, wouldn't it?
Rincewind Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 The Mail is owned by a Tory donator The paper is registered outside of Britain and therefore are not liable to our tax laws. I do not like the Mail full stop. Never have done. I am not keen on all the others either. The papers these days as Captain says go for sensationalism. But would the public be interested in Cameron covering up friends status and tax avoidance from others? It may be talked about for a day or so but soon forgotten. Any smear story or story affecting the public will be answered by any PM with a non-answer which avoids the question. It is an art they practice, giving answers to questions that were not asked. Last week while the tabloids were running with Corbyn stories, trade union bills and working tax credit bills were passed and there was little reporting on that. It just seems convenient that Corbyn not doing his top button up was deemed to be of more interest to the public. But I am an old skeptic who has noticed a pattern emerge over 50 years and many different governments I think the pig and Cameron thing as unimportant as Corbyn stories. I will condemn Cameron for not caring about sections of society but not for putting his dick in a pigs mouth.
fazzyfox Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 Disgusting. There are serious potential hygiene consequences due to the widely acknowledged overall filth and the reputation of being the dirtiest, shittiest, lowest standard species on earth. So if you're reading this, beware Pig, don't go anywhere near Tories.
Webbo Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 The story is from a Tory. A former mate of his Lord Ashcroft. So?
RedSoxUK Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 The Mail is owned by a Tory donator The paper is registered outside of Britain and therefore are not liable to our tax laws. I do not like the Mail full stop. Never have done. I am not keen on all the others either. The papers these days as Captain says go for sensationalism. But would the public be interested in Cameron covering up friends status and tax avoidance from others? It may be talked about for a day or so but soon forgotten. Any smear story or story affecting the public will be answered by any PM with a non-answer which avoids the question. It is an art they practice, giving answers to questions that were not asked. Last week while the tabloids were running with Corbyn stories, trade union bills and working tax credit bills were passed and there was little reporting on that. It just seems convenient that Corbyn not doing his top button up was deemed to be of more interest to the public. But I am an old skeptic who has noticed a pattern emerge over 50 years and many different governments I think the pig and Cameron thing as unimportant as Corbyn stories. I will condemn Cameron for not caring about sections of society but not for putting his dick in a pigs mouth. Very true, if it was beastiality it would be a whole different topic completely! He's a bit of a tosser for sticking his cock in a dead pigs mouth, and it can be condemned and criticised even by now-liberal media such as the Lad Bible who, had it been a story of a random uni undergrad would be greeted with #TopBantz #LAD; imho it makes Cameron look more human than degenerate by doing something so rash as stick his weiner in a dead pigs mouth. I'm pretty sure many of the OxBridge lot who have been involved with societies of the elite class have dome something similiar, perhaps worse.
ScouseFox Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 finally a political thread that is on my level
Guest Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 I dread to think what the rest of his bucket list must look like.
Buce Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 I dread to think what the rest of his bucket list must look like. 1) dismantle the Welfare State. 2) privatize the NHS. 3) do away with free healthcare. 4) abolish free education. 5) abolish State Pension by raising retirement age to 100. 6) socially cleanse London of Oiks. 7) abolish Trade Unions.
Strokes Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 1) dismantle the Welfare State. 2) privatize the NHS. 3) do away with free healthcare. 4) abolish free education. 5) abolish State Pension by raising retirement age to 100. 6) socially cleanse London of Oiks. 7) abolish Trade Unions. Hopefully that's in priority order. 1) dismantle the Welfare State. 2) privatize the NHS. 3) do away with free healthcare. 4) abolish free education. 5) abolish State Pension by raising retirement age to 100. 6) socially cleanse London of Oiks. 7) abolish Trade Unions. Hopefully that's in priority order.
johnny the fox Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 just heard the pig is suing for slander..
Bellend Sebastian Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 1) dismantle the Welfare State. 2) privatize the NHS. 3) do away with free healthcare. 4) abolish free education. 5) abolish State Pension by raising retirement age to 100. 6) socially cleanse London of Oiks. 7) abolish Trade Unions. You forgot destroy the BBC for no obvious reason
Stadt Posted 21 September 2015 Posted 21 September 2015 1) dismantle the Welfare State. 2) privatize the NHS. 3) do away with free healthcare. 4) abolish free education. 5) abolish State Pension by raising retirement age to 100. 6) socially cleanse London of Oiks. 7) abolish Trade Unions. He's not doing a very good job of it then
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.