foxes21 Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 Have a feeling we are switching to the 4-3-3/4-5-1 for the rest of the season. It makes sense, now we only have 3 strikers and Amartey coming in we potentially have six center mids with James nearing match fitness. How do people feel about this? I guess we will switch to the 4-4-1-1 when we are chasing a game.
Gerard Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 I wouldn't mind a 4-5-1 but don't think Albrighton is particularly suitable for it. We would need a wide man who cut in more and scored more goals.
Guest Sharpe's Fox Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 ew no Bournemouth away, Man City at home we looked insipid. Vardy can't play on his own, it is known
Staffs Fox Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 One up top is not the way to go, If anything I'd rather see 3-4-3 or a 4-3-3 but we haven't got the players to do it, If we brought another quality forward this might change but 4-4-2 for now is the best formation for the players we have,
Fox92 Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 Have a feeling we are switching to the 4-3-3/4-5-1 for the rest of the season. It makes sense, now we only have 3 strikers and Amartey coming in we potentially have six center mids with James nearing match fitness. How do people feel about this? I guess we will switch to the 4-4-1-1 when we are chasing a game. We play 4411 anyway. Okazaki plays behind Vardy, just like Nugent did in 2013/14.
GingerrrFox Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 Fancy it will become a 4-1-4-1 Kasper Simpson Morgan Huth Fuchs Drinkwater Mahrez Amartey Kante Gray Vardy
foxes21 Posted 20 January 2016 Author Posted 20 January 2016 Fancy it will become a 4-1-4-1 Kasper Simpson Morgan Huth Fuchs Drinkwater Mahrez Amartey Kante Gray Vardy That team does look.. Amazing. Albrighton shouldn't be dropped though.
coolhandfox Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 Fancy it will become a 4-1-4-1 Kasper Simpson Morgan Huth Fuchs Drinkwater Mahrez Amartey Kante Gray Vardy I would prefer Drinkwater further forward as he's are playmaker and doesn't have the mobility or a good enough tackler to play the holding role in my opinion.
Nalis Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 more attack please 1-2-8 All out attack and an additional player on the pitch, I like your style.
LegendOfJoe Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 If we where going to play 4-1-4-1 then id definitely drop Amartey into the DM role and keep Kante and Drinkwater further up the pitch
001merp Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 Have a feeling we are switching to the 4-3-3/4-5-1 for the rest of the season. It makes sense, now we only have 3 strikers and Amartey coming in we potentially have six center mids with James nearing match fitness. How do people feel about this? I guess we will switch to the 4-4-1-1 when we are chasing a game. After today I think we should stay with the 442
Will1981 Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 we need to play 2 strikers at all times we are pathetic when we play with 1 up.
Corky Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 Let's play a Garth Crooks formation- roughly a 2-2-6.
Mark Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 We play 4411 anyway. Okazaki plays behind Vardy, just like Nugent did in 2013/14. But it's makeshift again. We need a proper number 10 not a striker dropping deep.
foxes21 Posted 20 January 2016 Author Posted 20 January 2016 After today I think we should stay with the 442 Jesus Christ you are right!!!
weller54 Posted 20 January 2016 Posted 20 January 2016 we need to play 2 strikers at all times we are pathetic when we play with 1 up. And that 1 cvnt is Donkey Ulloa!!!
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 21 January 2016 Posted 21 January 2016 we need to play 2 strikers at all times we are pathetic when we play with 1 up.Seems that way doesn't itHowever I suppose it depends who the one up front is?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.