Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
BigWesMorgan

Middlesborough (A) Match Thread

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looks like a 4-3-1-2, we tried it against Stoke.

 

Kasper

Simpson, Morgan, Huth, Fuchs

King, Mendy, Amartey

Mahrez

Okazaki, Ulloa

 

Would have played Drinkwater instead of King, but it's still a decent line up. Unlucky on Gray & Chilwell, but Fuchs/Ulloa/Okazaki should be more fresh.

Posted

Seems like a team picked to not lose. Hope I'm wrong but can see this being a stinker of a game.  That said, if Mahrez can occupy their defence and Leo can cause a few problems in the air / from set pieces and we nick a result then who cares?

 

Still think a successful midfield diamond is a myth but hopefully the lack of width will do us a favour.

Guest CityFan 06
Posted

Okazaki can be pivotal away from home, links up our play so hopefully going forward we won't become too isolated. 

Guest Danny Clender
Posted

Much preferred 4-4-2, hahaha, errrrrr let's hope this isn't 4-4-2

Does look like a 4-3-3 or 4-3-1-2, bring it on!

Posted
1 minute ago, foxes21 said:

Looks like a 4-3-1-2, we tried it against Stoke.

 

Kasper

Simpson, Morgan, Huth, Fuchs

King, Mendy, Amartey

Mahrez

Okazaki, Ulloa

 

Would have played Drinkwater instead of King, but it's still a decent line up. Unlucky on Gray & Chilwell, but Fuchs/Ulloa/Okazaki should be more fresh.

This sounds right to me.

 

Agree with the statement on Gray / Chilwell, but both looked tired on Saturday. Games like this are a good example of being able to use the depth of your squad. Now we shall see if our squad is any good!

Posted
8 minutes ago, Aus Fox said:

both teams make 5 changes, they have Guzan in goal. Amongst their changes

Get that ball high onto Leo's head. Looking for Mahrez and Fuchs in particular to deliver this afternoon.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Fox 4 Life said:

Genuinely can't see where the goals are coming from so assume we are going for a draw here. 

ULLOAAAAAAA

Posted

my only concern with this line up, is King and Amartey are sideways/backwards passing midfielders. Amartey less so than King, but if this formation is to work we need to get the ball to Ulloa quickly so he can hold the ball and then Okazaki/Mahrez can play off him.

Posted

Sorry but I am not impressed. Other than injury/llness we should be trying to tap into the last games momentum. None of them should be exhausted as they've all had breaks. We have utterly dropped gear there and will likely hand initiative to Boro.

 

 

Posted

Bloody hell! Moaning before we've even kicked a ball! Get behind the team! At least it's a formation change from 442! Cummon Citeh! 

Posted

Same people moaning about us playing two in midfield all season are now moaning because he's switched it to three and they've realised they don't like how it looks lol

 

Damned if you do, damned if you don't 

Posted
2 minutes ago, kingfox said:

That would be a good team if you're playing walking football.

 

Where's the bloody pace :facepalm:

A fai argument, but if Boro sit back and let us have the ball pace going forward might not be that vital. Okazaki & Ulloa both have good movement off the ball, so I'm sure they'll cause them problems.

Posted

4-3-1-2 seems most likely but if amartey was played in cb then this could easily be 5-3-2

Posted
2 minutes ago, Marshall Cockney Fox said:

Sorry but I am not impressed. Other than injury/llness we should be trying to tap into the last games momentum. None of them should be exhausted as they've all had breaks. We have utterly dropped gear there and will likely hand initiative to Boro.

 

 

Totalled agree, the way to beat teams like Boro that setup well at home is to attack them with pace, we have no vardy and gray, Musa and albrighton are not starting. Makes no sense.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...